• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

Bug Reports - Community Created 3.5 D&D data set

Bloodwolf said:
I'm doing a quick comparison of tags for Eldritch Blast and Rapier. Can't seem to find anything that would indicate a reason why it is unselectable as a weapon. The reason given when hovering over the non-selectable symbol says I'm not the right size. Oh well I was hoping to assist with fixing this bug.
Click to expand...

Yea, this is actually intentional. I can probably make it selectable, but I didn't see a reason for doing that since you can't really "wield" it. I suppose since you can't use it while holding a weapon, it could be useful?

Bloodwolf said:
Unfortunately I did find a bug too. I'm making a new version of my Rogue/Warlock and tried to pick the Thay trait. As a result I also picked the Mind Over Body free feat. It gave me the feat but shows that I do not meet the requirements of race. It is also not using the ability that I selected for my HP modifier. I tried both and neither work. Is this because I don't meet the requirements?
Click to expand...

What is your race? The eval scripts on the trait and feat both appear to be looking at your race. The hp bonus appears to be tied to how many Metamagic feats you have. Do you have any?
 
Darkvision Error

I remember someone posting about the dark vision error before, but I don't remember any fix or eta on one. It is really getting aggravating, and making it hard to test new content is there any word on the status of the fix?
 
TobyFox2002 said:
I remember someone posting about the dark vision error before, but I don't remember any fix or eta on one. It is really getting aggravating, and making it hard to test new content is there any word on the status of the fix?
Click to expand...

Actually, I was running into it myself these past few days. I hadn't realized how much of a problem it was. I have several fixes in for this that will be in the next release. Not sure if I've captured all of them, though.
 
According to the Monster Manual the Half-Dragon type changes the type of the base creature to "Dragon." But does not recalculate Base Saves or Base attacks.

The Half-Dragon, is not correctly applying the Dragon Type to characters in hero labs. As a result, it is giving back prerequisite errors when dealing with dragon feats/spells/abilities and dragonblood feats/spells/abilities.
 
TobyFox2002 said:
According to the Monster Manual the Half-Dragon type changes the type of the base creature to "Dragon." But does not recalculate Base Saves or Base attacks.

The Half-Dragon, is not correctly applying the Dragon Type to characters in hero labs. As a result, it is giving back prerequisite errors when dealing with dragon feats/spells/abilities and dragonblood feats/spells/abilities.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the report. I'll check it out.

Update: This looks like a core issue. I'll throw is Shadow's way.
 
Last edited:
Sendric said:
Another satisfied customer. :D
Click to expand...

TobyFox2002 said:
*rofl*
Click to expand...

Well when I read more carefully I discovered the thing I thought was a bug was not. :D

Although there is another issue I am wondering about, (might be a bug). So in the Expanded Psionics Handbook, the Thri-Kreen's racial bonuses are somewhat different from the ones in the data set. Is this a bug? I only have a handful of 3.5 books so maybe the data set's stats are valid and from a different source? I did discover the editor today and made a copy of the Thri-Kreen and changed it to match what it says in my EPH but I probably messed something up.

Also, Complete Psionics has something called Racial Classes. Are those implemented somewhere?

Thanks in advance!
 
I apologize if this is not the correct place to be doing this but I think I may have come across a bug.

When playing a Paladin before when you marked off a use of your channel ability then it would automatically mark off two uses of the lay on hands, as it should per the core rule book. I think it started in the update when the the button to reset abilities after nights rest that is no longer happening automatically.
 
GoldenBlue said:
Although there is another issue I am wondering about, (might be a bug). So in the Expanded Psionics Handbook, the Thri-Kreen's racial bonuses are somewhat different from the ones in the data set. Is this a bug? I only have a handful of 3.5 books so maybe the data set's stats are valid and from a different source? I did discover the editor today and made a copy of the Thri-Kreen and changed it to match what it says in my EPH but I probably messed something up.
Click to expand...

I took a look. The adjustments provided in the editor appear to have been done to match the ability scores of the Thri-Kreen entry. For example, the Thri-Kreen on page 213 has an Dexterity score of 15 (+5 like the editor), but the entry for Thri-Kreen as a character grants only a +4. I think it probably makes sense to make it match the Thri-Kreen as a character entry instead. I'll make the changes.

Also, Complete Psionics has something called Racial Classes. Are those implemented somewhere?
Click to expand...

No, not at this time. I'll look into what it would take to implement that.
 
Jimbo420 said:
I apologize if this is not the correct place to be doing this but I think I may have come across a bug.

When playing a Paladin before when you marked off a use of your channel ability then it would automatically mark off two uses of the lay on hands, as it should per the core rule book. I think it started in the update when the the button to reset abilities after nights rest that is no longer happening automatically.
Click to expand...

The Paladin is a core class, so this should probably be reported in the 5.3 release thread (which is also serving as a bug thread for that release).
 
Sendric said:
I took a look. The adjustments provided in the editor appear to have been done to match the ability scores of the Thri-Kreen entry. For example, the Thri-Kreen on page 213 has an Dexterity score of 15 (+5 like the editor), but the entry for Thri-Kreen as a character grants only a +4. I think it probably makes sense to make it match the Thri-Kreen as a character entry instead. I'll make the changes.

No, not at this time. I'll look into what it would take to implement that.
Click to expand...

Thanks for your good work on these data files! BTW, see page 14 of the EPH for the full race description for players.
 
Jimbo420 said:
I apologize if this is not the correct place to be doing this but I think I may have come across a bug.

When playing a Paladin before when you marked off a use of your channel ability then it would automatically mark off two uses of the lay on hands, as it should per the core rule book. I think it started in the update when the the button to reset abilities after nights rest that is no longer happening automatically.
Click to expand...
These terms are for Pathfinder paladins not for 3.5 paladin. 3.5 Paladin does not get "uses per day" for Lay on Hands. They also don't have Channel Energy.

So make sure if you report this you report this for Pathfinder not d20. :)
 
Another Bug - Knight Starting HP

I think I found another bug. My wife created a knight character and it doesn't seem to be added the max hit dice at first level. Her HP was only her con modifier (3). It should have been 15, right? (d12 + con mod?)
 
GoldenBlue said:
I think I found another bug. My wife created a knight character and it doesn't seem to be added the max hit dice at first level. Her HP was only her con modifier (3). It should have been 15, right? (d12 + con mod?)
Click to expand...

Yep. That's a bug. It's an easy fix. If you open 3.5 - Players Handbook 2 in the editor and go to the Class tab and select "Knight". Enter 12 for "Hit Dice # Sides", save and test. This will resolve the issue. In the meantime, I'll make the fix for the next release. Looks like this class could use some touch-up anyway.
 
Bug in Warblade

So my character is a Half-Orc Warblade at level 4. He should have no special bonuses to his Reflex Save except that granted by the Battle Clarity class feature. His Int is 14 (+2) and his Dex is 16 (+3) so by my (admittedly often flawed math) his Reflex save should be 6 = 1 (from the warblade class table) + 3 (dex mod) + 2 (granted by Battle Clarity). The software is reporting 8. Perhaps the software is adding his warblade level [4] to the Ref save instead of min(IntMod [2], WarbladeClassLevel [4])?

Let me know if I'm crazy and a fix if you can,

Thanks!
 
GoldenBlue said:
So my character is a Half-Orc Warblade at level 4. He should have no special bonuses to his Reflex Save except that granted by the Battle Clarity class feature. His Int is 14 (+2) and his Dex is 16 (+3) so by my (admittedly often flawed math) his Reflex save should be 6 = 1 (from the warblade class table) + 3 (dex mod) + 2 (granted by Battle Clarity). The software is reporting 8. Perhaps the software is adding his warblade level [4] to the Ref save instead of min(IntMod [2], WarbladeClassLevel [4])?

Let me know if I'm crazy and a fix if you can,

Thanks!
Click to expand...

Yep. It's a bug. If you open the Tome of Battle user file and find Battle Clarity in the Class Special tab, you can change that last line of the eval script to this:

Code: 
#applybonus[BonInsight, hero.child[vRef], bonus]

That should resolve it. Thanks for the report.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top