• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

User Content Bug Reports

Status
Not open for further replies.
I remember thinking that was wierd when I programmed it, but left the excess cantrips in because that was RAW.
 
I remember thinking that was wierd when I programmed it, but left the excess cantrips in because that was RAW.

In D20, there are a number of new 0 level spells.
If a DM "added" them to the Duskblade spell list, he would be able to take them.

In other words, I'd leave them in there because the RAW over allocates.
 
In D20, there are a number of new 0 level spells.
If a DM "added" them to the Duskblade spell list, he would be able to take them.

In other words, I'd leave them in there because the RAW over allocates.
Yea good point. Many people do house rule new cantrips and even 1st levels spells to the duskblade. Not that class really needs it. :p
 
Strongarm bracers

The Strongarm bracers aren't reducing the penalty for wielding an oversize weapon!

Once I've sent the MIC - specific weapons file for the 1.4 release I'll look into trying to code this!
 
Last edited:
Natural Bond from Complete Adventurer doesn't cap the bonus at the character's hit dice. I've added code to fix this, and will add the file to the 1.4 drop.
 
Last edited:
Elf Domain - no spell list or granted power

The elf domain exists, but it does not actually grant the power (Point Blank Shot feat) or have an associated list of domain spells.

Thanks.
 
The Brutal Throw feat (CAdv) does not seem to do anything.

Steps to reproduce
1) Select some sort of giant as the race
2) Give it a Fighter level
3) Select a few ranged weapons, either missiles (eg bows) or thrown
4) Select Brutal Throw feat
The Attack bonuses for the various weapons do not change whether you have the feat or not.

Thanks!
 
The Brutal Throw feat (CAdv) does not seem to do anything.
*Edit*
The Attack bonuses for the various weapons do not change whether you have the feat or not. Thanks!

I don't have the CAdv book to hand but if memory serves correctly Brutal throw only applies to thrown weapons so it's a conditional modifier. It doesn't apply to all ranged weapons, the easiest method is to apply the modifier manually instead of coding it into the feat.
The feat would have to parse through all ranged weapons and determine if it applied as a "Thrown Weapon" which would probably mean user tagging the projectiles that qualify. Ignoring bows, crossbows, ballistae and such like. Thrown daggers would benefit but the melee portion of a dagger wouldn't. Hope this helps!
 
The elf domain exists, but it does not actually grant the power (Point Blank Shot feat) or have an associated list of domain spells.
Thanks for the report this will be looked into.

The Brutal Throw feat (CAdv) does not seem to do anything.
Thanks for the report will be looked into.

The feat would have to parse through all ranged weapons and determine if it applied as a "Thrown Weapon" which would probably mean user tagging the projectiles that qualify. Ignoring bows, crossbows, ballistae and such like. Thrown daggers would benefit but the melee portion of a dagger wouldn't. Hope this helps!
So just double checked and this is the same as Pathfinder so this all actually can be done. Their is a Ranged and a Melee fields for weapons. So we just have to remove the Dex Bonus and add back in the Str bonus to the Ranged bonus for weapons tagged with wCategory.RangeThrow.

I should be able to take a look at this hopefully in the next few days.
 
Nit:

File: RotW - Weapons.user

Weapon: Elven Lightblade: wSwordElLi

Bug: the "Weapon Finesse Applies" check box needs to be checked.

Thanks.
 
Nit:

File: RotW - Weapons.user

Weapon: Elven Lightblade: wSwordElLi

Bug: the "Weapon Finesse Applies" check box needs to be checked.

Thanks.
Thanks for the report this will be looked into.

Update: The Sword, Elven Lightblade is a Light weapon and all light weapons can be weapon finessed. I double checked this with a 1st level fighter with 16 Dex and Weapon Finesse feat.
 
Last edited:
I Grabbed the 1.4 files for testing the errors encountered were Demons duplicated, removal of the seperate demon - ???? files eradicated all errors.

The File Ros - Races.user Duplicate thing encountered Immunity to Confusion.

This clashes with the xImmConfus located in the MM - Immunity Special.user file.

I've renamed the reference from the Ros - Races file to xImmConfu2 and amended the MM - Immuntiy Special v1.4 file to replace the unique id in the RoS file.

Both files have been uploaded into the 1.4 Dropbox folder.
 
Last edited:
Did a complete clean and re install of HL on a spare system to test for errors against the 1.4 files again! The only error encountered on compile start up was duplicate RoS - Races immunity to confusion.

No other errors reported once the ability was renamed/removed from the offending file.
 
Not a bug per se but in the spell lists there are numerous duplicates that clash with the Spell Compendium.

I disabled the Complete Arcane data set and most of the duplicates disappeared. As it has been discussed before about not using the replace unique ids I'm wondering what the community would prefer to solve this situation.
 
Not a bug per se but in the spell lists there are numerous duplicates that clash with the Spell Compendium.

I disabled the Complete Arcane data set and most of the duplicates disappeared. As it has been discussed before about not using the replace unique ids I'm wondering what the community would prefer to solve this situation.

What we've done in the past is to create one spell (based on the newest version) and source it to both books. Likely, this would mean removing the spells from the Complete Arcane data set and adding the source to the ones from Spell Compendium.
 
well, I'm back after a long break of having to drop most of the HL-related stuff I was doing.

I think I still have some stuff I was building when I dropped, and haven't sent out yet. if someone could point me in the right direction on new addition procedures that would help.
 
Sure check us out in the User Projects forums where we are currently working on release 1.5. Also send me an email and we can get you invited to the DropBox application we use for the project.

ShadowChemosh(at)yahoo(dot)com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top