Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I remember thinking that was wierd when I programmed it, but left the excess cantrips in because that was RAW.
Yea good point. Many people do house rule new cantrips and even 1st levels spells to the duskblade. Not that class really needs it.In D20, there are a number of new 0 level spells.
If a DM "added" them to the Duskblade spell list, he would be able to take them.
In other words, I'd leave them in there because the RAW over allocates.
The Brutal Throw feat (CAdv) does not seem to do anything.
*Edit*
The Attack bonuses for the various weapons do not change whether you have the feat or not. Thanks!
Thanks for the report this will be looked into.The elf domain exists, but it does not actually grant the power (Point Blank Shot feat) or have an associated list of domain spells.
Thanks for the report will be looked into.The Brutal Throw feat (CAdv) does not seem to do anything.
So just double checked and this is the same as Pathfinder so this all actually can be done. Their is a Ranged and a Melee fields for weapons. So we just have to remove the Dex Bonus and add back in the Str bonus to the Ranged bonus for weapons tagged with wCategory.RangeThrow.The feat would have to parse through all ranged weapons and determine if it applied as a "Thrown Weapon" which would probably mean user tagging the projectiles that qualify. Ignoring bows, crossbows, ballistae and such like. Thrown daggers would benefit but the melee portion of a dagger wouldn't. Hope this helps!
Thanks for the report this will be looked into.Nit:
File: RotW - Weapons.user
Weapon: Elven Lightblade: wSwordElLi
Bug: the "Weapon Finesse Applies" check box needs to be checked.
Thanks.
Not a bug per se but in the spell lists there are numerous duplicates that clash with the Spell Compendium.
I disabled the Complete Arcane data set and most of the duplicates disappeared. As it has been discussed before about not using the replace unique ids I'm wondering what the community would prefer to solve this situation.