I completely agre with you on how it hurts smaller companies than larger ones, which is why I want content providers to have as much control as possible. I know it annoys some gamers, but I feel the more content providers are protected, the stronger the hobby grows. The lesser they are protected, the hobby as a whole weakens.
Of course, in my experience, it's the smaller companies, the one man shops, that not only tend to be less protected, they also tend to want more people to share their products. A gaming store I used to play in NYC, you would see the smaller providers asking the gaming store to run games there, and not force the players to buy their content. It's advertising. So in some ways, it depends on what the content providers want out of realm works.
I think you and I agree,we're just saying the same things in different ways.
As for how many, it becomes a very tough thing when you consider conventions. Even small cons, like the ones held at universities, have tons of people. I remember when I used to run games at cons for free badges. I would run the same module, my own, maybe 5 times, so like 20-25 people. Other people would run a module they purchased. Completely legal. So 6 groups would run for a single model that costs probably 20.00. Is that what they envisioned? Probably not. By nothing wrong with it.
Not sure how it works with realms works though.
Last edited:
