Also Chellan, the Sword of Greed from the last Pathfinder Module is missing from Weapons.
A number of artifacts were left out of various sources - searching old material for them is on my to-do list.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also Chellan, the Sword of Greed from the last Pathfinder Module is missing from Weapons.
Just noticed that the Cav's Animal Link info says Druid - since it's a direct copy of that aspect. Unless it's because my PC has Druid 1 and Cav 1.
Unsure if this is fixed or if I'm just not working it right - Do the In-Play modifications - say things like using the Wand of CLW charges - stick around? I noticed that when I marked off the 8 charges for the in-play session did not reduce the number of blank boxes on the PDF printout. I'm unsure if they should or how to reduce the overall number of charges.
Issak
I noticed in the skill sections of both my Druid's animal companion, his riding horse and the pack horse that they all show the fly skill as a class skill. The Leopard animal companion has a Flyy skill mod of +7, the horses have Fly skill mods of +0.
It just seems unusual for them to have the Fly skill.
I just noticed that HeroLabs gives you the Persuasive feat at 8th level for the Nobility domain instead of the Leadership feat noted in the Core Rulebook (p. 46).
Leadership (Ex): At 8th level, you receive Leadership as
a bonus feat. In addition, you gain a +2 bonus on your
leadership score as long as you uphold the tenets of your
deity (or divine concept if you do not venerate a deity).
In the APG, one of the options for the Aspect of the Beast feat allows a druid character of sufficient level who possesses the wild shape ability with low-light vision such as an elf to gain darkvision but HeroLabs shows this feat greyed out with a notation in red stating:
You already have low-light vision or darkvision - this ability would be redundant.
Hey,I am attempting to add a Alchemical Silver Sai to my monk, and I am being told that the character is not proficient in the weapon. Now that I am looking, ot has all the special monk weapons greyed out, saying that I am not proficient.
Can you try something for me, please? Create a new druid and/or inquisitor (as a new character), give them a few spells, and take a look at their spell sheets - do they have this problem? If they don't have the problem, it's probably a bug I've seen before with some 0-level spells that hang around on older portfolios, but I haven't managed to track down yet.
If the new characters don't have this problem, would you mind emailing the old ones to me - my email is my user name here, @wolflair.com, hopefully that'll help track the bug down.
I am having the same problem with my Sorcerer. Unwitting Ally shows up on the spells tab and on the print out but not under Sorcerer where I actually select my spells.
Also (and if this has been covered elsewhere, I'm sorry), my oracle of life shows all of the cure spells through 9th level even though he is only 1st level.
The spells beyond what you can cast are greyed out, right? Since prestige classes could alter the caster level of the Oracle, there's no good way to tie the aquisition of the cure spells to the class level of the oracle, and the caster level is added too late in the evaluation sequence to be useful. Basically, I couldn't find a solution that would let me only add the cure spells once they became available, so they're all present, and the ones you can't use yet are greyed out.
This is a pathfinder thing and HL is correct. It is light for purposes of Movement not proficiency. See Mithirl for full details but the important part is "This decrease does not apply to proficiency in wearing the armor."I made an 8th level Alchemist and gave him a suit of +1 Mithril Chainmail. My understanding is that Mithril reduces the weight category by one, so the normally medium chainmail should now be light, and Alchemists are proficient with light armor.
It looks as though HL is still imposing the non-proficiency penalties (BAB is reduced from +6/+1 to +4/-1, Skill bonuses are reduced by 2).
This is a pathfinder thing and HL is correct. It is light for purposes of Movement not proficiency. See Mithirl for full details but the important part is "This decrease does not apply to proficiency in wearing the armor."
The only exception to that rule is Elven Chainmail which is light for all purposes now.