• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

Environement bugs and L5R

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuni_tetsu at yahoo.com
  • Start date Start date
K

kuni_tetsu at yahoo.com

Guest
Note: I am moving this to the cardvault list since there are only 3 people who
actively post on the cv-l5r list, and I would like more feedback.

--- Edward Bolme <edward@bolme.com> wrote:
> > If you are playing Jade, then filter out Gold and
> > Diamond, and you should be fine!
>
> No, because pre-Jade cards are not necessarily Jade legal, etc. Furthermore,
> there are cards that are strict Jade legal that never had the Jade bug (all
> of them, I believe, non-experienced personalities).

Okay, you are right. For Jade, I added the Jade bug to all cards that became
Jade legal (older cards that became Jade Legal that is). If you sort for Jade,
you get all the cards we have in the data base that can be used for Jade. If I
could force a filter for jade bug when you select Jade format, I would do so,
but I cannot. I had to do this, because they introduced an idiotic rule whereby
if a personality appeared with a Jade bug, all previous versions of that
personality became Jade legal. However, I do not want to add the newer bugs to
older cards...

My idea (and I should likely add this to the FAQ) is this: Filter out the newer
sets you do not want. That allows the MRP mechanism in CV to do all the rest of
the work for you.

If you want to play Jade, then exclude all the sets with Gold or Diamond cards
-That way you have all the Jade or older sets available, and with "Merge
Duplicates" on CV will show you what cards are Jade bugged (they will be the
latest MRP available to display).

The same applies to Gold. Once a Diamond only set comes out, just exclude that
set and the Gold bugs "rise to the top" and with "Merge" on you will see your
gold bugs.

Since the vast majority of current players do not own anything but Gold cards,
that should work fine.

For Diamond, everything I have seen from AEG tells me that they will never pull
a stunt like Jade again, so Diamond will work like gold. The only question is
the transition period - when Diamond cards are coming out, but Gold is still
played in tournaments. However, if you filter out the Diamond Only sets, and
allow all other sets, you can use Merge Duplicates and you will still get a
total count of cards that are gold legal.


The only real problem is those that validate decks against inventory, and do
not have a lot of older cards.

How far does this MRP stuff go? Should I go back and change the text of every
version of the card if the text changes in the MRP? Do I go back and change the
faction a card belongs to? What if someone wants to go back and play a Jade or
Imperial game? If a personality was Crab in Jade, but became Crane in Gold, am
I supposed to change their faction for the older card? What if they are playing
a Jade game? The faction will not sort correctly because the personality was
changed for MRP. That is why I am designing this to work for the older sets by
filtering out the newer sets, and let the MRP mechanism in CV handle the rest.

> BTW, I don't see Evil Feeds in the SW database...

Correct, SW is not complete for Jade yet.


=====
---

Kuni Tetsu
Clan War rules guy
Moderator of ClanWar-l

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
 
> If you want to play Jade, then exclude all the sets with Gold or Diamond
cards
> -That way you have all the Jade or older sets available, and with "Merge
> Duplicates" on CV will show you what cards are Jade bugged (they will be
the
> latest MRP available to display).

This still requires the people to pay attention to the filtered cards. That
is, they haven't filtered down to the cards they want, just down to the
cards such that the ones they want are most recent.

> Since the vast majority of current players do not own anything but Gold
cards,
> that should work fine.

This is, IMHO, a dubious assumption. Most L5R players I know have stuff back
to IE.

> For Diamond, everything I have seen from AEG tells me that they will never
pull
> a stunt like Jade again, so Diamond will work like gold. The only question
is
> the transition period - when Diamond cards are coming out, but Gold is
still
> played in tournaments. However, if you filter out the Diamond Only sets,
and
> allow all other sets, you can use Merge Duplicates and you will still get
a
> total count of cards that are gold legal.

It just seems easiest to have filters for Jade, Gold, and Diamond, with
perhaps a separate one for Extended.

> How far does this MRP stuff go? Should I go back and change the text of
every
> version of the card if the text changes in the MRP?

No, IMHO. You can always do the MND thing where we list both versions, but
I'd leave the text as is. If they need to see the MRP, it's easy enough to
do in CV. Or via websites.

> Do I go back and change the faction a card belongs to? What if someone
wants to go back and play a Jade or
> Imperial game? If a personality was Crab in Jade, but became Crane in
Gold, am
> I supposed to change their faction for the older card?

That's a very good point. Lemme think about this.
 
Actually, I guess I am going to have a new field for tournament legality, and
then leave the bug field for those cards that actually have a particular bug.

Ugh.


=====
---

Kuni Tetsu
Clan War rules guy
Moderator of ClanWar-l

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
 
--- Edward Bolme <edward@bolme.com> wrote:
> > Since the vast majority of current players do not own anything but Gold
> cards,
> > that should work fine.
>
> This is, IMHO, a dubious assumption. Most L5R players I know have stuff back
> to IE.

Not that dubious. That is information from AEG itself. Most of the players of
L5R are new players.

> It just seems easiest to have filters for Jade, Gold, and Diamond, with
> perhaps a separate one for Extended.

You are, of course, right. It is just going to take a lot of work to add it all
in to the data base. Luckily, CV makes it easier, since I can just turn off
Merge Duplicates and check out which cards appear in sets from different
tournament formats :D

> > Do I go back and change the faction a card belongs to? What if someone
> wants to go back and play a Jade or
> > Imperial game? If a personality was Crab in Jade, but became Crane in
> Gold, am
> > I supposed to change their faction for the older card?
>
> That's a very good point. Lemme think about this.

Moshi Wakiza is a prime example... However, we are certainly doing it for
Ninja, but in that case, it is due to how the Ninja faction is defined (anyone
with the Ninja trait).

Spirit, Shadowlands, and Ninja all work off of a trait, so they sort of
"automatically" add factions to certain cards. However, some families
leave/join different factions at different times, and I think their old faction
data should stand.

What do the L5R players say?


=====
---

Kuni Tetsu
Clan War rules guy
Moderator of ClanWar-l

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Rent DVDs Online-No late fees! Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/OdoN7C/oEZFAA/46VHAA/WuQolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
 
--- Kuni Tetsu <kuni_tetsu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Spirit, Shadowlands, and Ninja all work off of a trait, so they
> sort of
> "automatically" add factions to certain cards. However, some
> families
> leave/join different factions at different times, and I think their
> old faction
> data should stand.

Note that Shadowlands and Ninja work differently. The first is a
faction trait, the second actually isn't. There are no cards with the
"Shadowlands Horde" faction trait, so that is kind of an "empty"
faction.


Cheers

Abilio

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
 
> Not that dubious. That is information from AEG itself. Most of the players
of
> L5R are new players.

Interesting. I'll run a poll at the Kotei up here.
 
--- Jimmy Jinx <jimmy_jinx@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Note that Shadowlands and Ninja work differently. The first is a
> faction trait, the second actually isn't. There are no cards with the
> "Shadowlands Horde" faction trait, so that is kind of an "empty"
> faction.

The Ninja trait *used* to mean that the person could use Ninja items and
actions that keyed off being a ninja. It existed long before the faction
appeared, which then sort of "co-opted" the trait.


=====
---

Kuni Tetsu
Clan War rules guy
Moderator of ClanWar-l

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
 
Yes, I know. I only meant that while Ninja *did* co-opt the trait,
the Horde *didn't*. There are no cards with the Shadowlands Horde
faction alignment.



--- Kuni Tetsu <kuni_tetsu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- Jimmy Jinx <jimmy_jinx@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Note that Shadowlands and Ninja work differently. The first is a
> > faction trait, the second actually isn't. There are no cards with
> the
> > "Shadowlands Horde" faction trait, so that is kind of an "empty"
> > faction.
>
> The Ninja trait *used* to mean that the person could use Ninja
> items and
> actions that keyed off being a ninja. It existed long before the
> faction
> appeared, which then sort of "co-opted" the trait.
>
>
> =====
> ---
>
> Kuni Tetsu
> Clan War rules guy
> Moderator of ClanWar-l
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> cardvault-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
 
I may be jumping into this thread stupidly and horribly late, but then
those things haven't stopped me in the past. :-)

The following idea is based on a perfunctory knowledge of L5R at best and a
quick scan of the entire thread. It's possible this idea is unworkable and
also possible this was already mentioned in the thread and I missed it. If
so, please accept my apologies in advance. All that being said....

You might consider creating a separate tag group that is specifically
tailored for the purpose of filtering cards by playable set. This idea is
already in use within the Magic cards, where there are the "blocks" (e.g.
Ice Age, Urza, etc.). Each "block" dictates that a specific set of cards
meeting certain criteria are able to be played. This sounds like a parallel
situation to the Jade/Emerald/Diamond stuff. By creating a separate group
with tags specific to each playable "block", the user can quickly filter
just the cards that are valid within that block, regardless of whatever
else they want to filter on. This method could make it much easier for the
user to get just the Jade cards vs Emerald cards.

Hope this helps,
Rob

At 07:05 AM 2/10/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Note: I am moving this to the cardvault list since there are only 3 people who
>actively post on the cv-l5r list, and I would like more feedback.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com
 
Back
Top