Pathfinder Bug Reports - version 4.11

[KilroySummoner]

The eidolon claws evolution needs a combo box specifying whether they apply to arms or legs, with backing validation on whether there are enough limbs to place them. Currently HeroLab incorrectly allows things such as a biped with Claws-Arms and slam without following the slam-replacement text and adjusting the printout sheet.

As it stands, HeroLab assumes all biped that have slam have chosen claws-legs. It also allows claws (and prints out the attack) without any backing limbs to support them.

[Jim.DiGriz]

Oops, never mind.

[ValaraukarU]

Originally Posted by ShadowChemosh

If you mean you have a magical +1 Light Shield and that HL only gives a total of +1 instead of +2 this is correct. See Jason Bulmahn's post HERE about it.

Note that the official errata for 2nd printing contradicts Jason's post. I assume 3rd and 4th printing use the new text.

The new text reads:

"Add your shield's enhancement bonus to attack and damage rolls made with
the shield as if it were a weapon enhancement bonus."

Although in this case the +1 Light shield is the same either way.

[ShadowChemosh]

Originally Posted by ValaraukarU

Note that the official errata for 2nd printing contradicts Jason's post. I assume 3rd and 4th printing use the new text.

The new text reads:

"Add your shield's enhancement bonus to attack and damage rolls made with
the shield as if it were a weapon enhancement bonus."

Although in this case the +1 Light shield is the same either way.

I wish Paizo would include previous errata in the new versions so one does not have to check multiple PDFs. Oh well.

Actually then with this change the OP is actually correct. If one is using a non-magical shield they get NO bonus. If using a +5 Shield they should be getting a +5 bonus on Hit/Dmg. Damn that really makes that a nice feat now.

[bodrin]

Originally Posted by ShadowChemosh

I wish Paizo would include previous errata in the new versions so one does not have to check multiple PDFs. Oh well.

I keep all the printed Errata inside the core book just for this very reason, it makes it easier to reference the correct information. But it just gets messy when there's loads of sheets!
V3.5 Errata anyone? one ring binder full of plastic pockets containing numerous clarifications!

[Silveras]

This may have been posted before, but when looking at the tooltips for spells (hover mouse over the ? ), the entries include Level, Casting Time, School, SubSchool, Components, Range, Duration, Saving Throw, and whether or not Spell Resistance applies .. but not the Target, Area, or Effect entries.

[Silveras]

Originally Posted by ShadowChemosh

I wish Paizo would include previous errata in the new versions so one does not have to check multiple PDFs. Oh well.

Actually then with this change the OP is actually correct. If one is using a non-magical shield they get NO bonus. If using a +5 Shield they should be getting a +5 bonus on Hit/Dmg. Damn that really makes that a nice feat now.

Supposedly, they produce 1 PDF per previous printing with all of the errata for each printing. So, for a 1st Printing copy, you would look for the updated 1st printing PDF each time a new set of errata is released. Are you seeing cases where that is not true?

[Silveras]

Originally Posted by ShadowChemosh

Just an FYI here is James Jacob's latest post, Tuesday 11/30/2010, on the subject. Not sure its that helpful as he sort of saying its correct both ways.

Maybe someday we will get an official FAQ entry.

Another of James Jacobs recent posts talks about how he speaks mainly from personal opinion on rules questions, not rules-officially. He mentions being reluctant to weigh in on rules questions for that reason.

[Dragnmoon]

Originally Posted by Silveras

Supposedly, they produce 1 PDF per previous printing with all of the errata for each printing. So, for a 1st Printing copy, you would look for the updated 1st printing PDF each time a new set of errata is released. Are you seeing cases where that is not true?

I just checked, they keep the changes for each errata in each edition of it.

[quixoticparadigm]

If you create a new rogue and add 10 levels all at once, all Rogue Talents are unlocked for the 5 you have to choose (it should be 4 regular rogue talents plus 1 advanced rogue talent).