|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East SF Bay Area
Posts: 55
|
creating magic armor is a total PITA that is NOT intuitive at all. I have to buy the quality up first then a lvl 1 rune than a lvl 2 rune etc. Any way we could just get some checkboxes or something that is easier than what it does now?
It sucks when I spent so long trying to figure out how to do something that HL Classic does with next to zero effort. |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
|
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East SF Bay Area
Posts: 55
|
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago, IL (USA)
Posts: 10,729
|
By the rules of the game you must have a +1 Rune before you are allowed to upgrade to a +2. This is the same for Item Quality as you must have a minimum quality before applying a specific rune. So why is following the PF2 rules a bad thing in this case?
I am honestly trying to understand because the flow of adding Item Quality and then runes to me is very logical. Hero Lab Resources: Pathfinder - d20pfsrd and Pathfinder Pack Setup 3.5 D&D (d20) - Community Server Setup 5E D&D - Community Server Setup Hero Lab Help - Hero Lab FAQ, Editor Tutorials and Videos, Editor & Scripting Resources. Created by the community for the community - Realm Works kickstarter backer (Alpha Wolf) and Beta tester.- d20 HL package volunteer editor. |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East SF Bay Area
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
|
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East SF Bay Area
Posts: 55
|
Heightened spells in Wands and in spell slots is something that just can't figure out. I have to conclude that the functionality isn't in the program. Probably should just bug report it
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,321
|
It's there, I've done both. There's a -/+ Box in the spell selection that lets you increase the spell level (I'd be more specific but HLO is down) though it's not reflected well on the PDF sheet.
Currently Running: Pathfinder Second Edition Currently Playing: Pathfinder First Edition, Star Trek Adventures Former HL Games: D&D 4e & 5e, Mutants & Masterminds 2E & 3E, Savage Worlds |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,321
|
For what it's worth, my wife (who is, to be fair, legally blind) loathes the UI compared to HLC and hated the sheet output (which she has to use during games) even more.
Currently Running: Pathfinder Second Edition Currently Playing: Pathfinder First Edition, Star Trek Adventures Former HL Games: D&D 4e & 5e, Mutants & Masterminds 2E & 3E, Savage Worlds |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Germany, so please bear with my English
Posts: 378
|
Well, the sheet output does look more like something from accounting than a modern character, that's true, but for me the UI is lightyears better than HLC. But I understand that visually impaired persons do have special requirements and HLO might not be best suited for those. I don't have it in front of me right now, but isn't there a high contrast mode or something? Or am I confusing it with Realm Works?
In response to the OP, I agree, it took me way longer than it probably should to figure out how to create a magic item. HLO can't change the rules, but there's probably room for improvement on the UI in this regard. Unfortunately I don't have a great idea how to go about it, right now. Maybe something like they recently did with the skills and the dots and locks? Maybe something similiar could be done for the item quality at least?! |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East SF Bay Area
Posts: 55
|
They are working on the UI. This and the Spell UI was something they wanted to fix after they got all of the major bugs ironed out.
Yeah, after reporting this as a bug. I talked to someone about this and swapped some screen shots. I finally figured out how to do this. ALso in one of the updates they DO give some indication that the spell has been heightened. So it's a smidge better. |
#10 |
|
|