• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

Weapon Pre-req

Frodie

Well-known member
I have a pre-req that has "Proficiency with a specific, one-handed weapon"

I can get it to search for one-handed weapons, but "unarmed" meets all the requirements and it's attached to the hero. Well I have tried all kinds of way to exclude it, with no luck. I have used the id, wpn cat, and non-lethal. But for whatever reason, it just seems to not look at unarmed. Any ideas? This is what I have at the moment.
Thank you for any ideas and help.


Code:
 foreach pick in hero from BaseWep where "! Helper.Always2H|! wFtrGroup.Natural"
          validif (eachpick.tagis[Helper.Proficient] <> 0)
          nexteach
 
Last edited:
Is this like proficiency with chosen weapon or is it literally something like "proficiency with longsword"?
 
Can you actually post the feat? I mean if it is literally a specific weapon (as in THIS longsword) you'll have to do an eval rule that checks after the fact. If it's longswords, then you'll check for the profiency group tag on the hero and check for the WepProf.? tag.
 
Can you actually post the feat? I mean if it is literally a specific weapon (as in THIS longsword) you'll have to do an eval rule that checks after the fact. If it's longswords, then you'll check for the profiency group tag on the hero and check for the WepProf.? tag.
In the example of a longsword wouldn't you also need to check for the Martial Weapon Proficiency feat as that would give a global proficiency to all martial weapons (Hero.ProfMart)?
 
I think it would be easier to just do it as groups. That's why I went with just any proficiency with a "one handed" weapon.

Thinking about it, the class already has the simple weapons proficiency. So maybe I am just chasing my tail. It might just be easier to just note it in the ability description.
 
Back
Top