• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

Pathfinder 2nd Edition

I agree with the idea that LW has a VERY small profit margin for what it sells.
Hm. It takes one person about 4 weeks to do one book? Would you say that's fair? Besides the LW staff, you're probably the one with the most experience in building data sets...

So you've got paid staff for that month, plus infrastructure/overhead costs. How much is that? How many people purchase said content? Is it enough to cover costs? And remember, you want to recoup your costs at least within the same fiscal year, probably within a few months of release. Anything after that is "gravy", so to speak.

LW is not a public company so there's no way to know how those numbers work out. Therefore, it's not possible to even guess at whether the margin is large or small, and it probably varies for each Paizo publication.

I would not want to be the middle manager responsible for making sure that such development is and stays profitable. :rolleyes:

Because the servers have to stay on anyway and disk space has to be used no matter if a person is paying the subscription cost or not.
That depends. A common technique nowadays is to outsource your server processing to a cloud service like Amazon Web Services. There are tiered plans where the customer plays a flat amount, then incrementally based on usage. If usage is low, there's a minimum charge and when usage spikes up, costs go up. There are some big advantages — automatically capacity increases, for example.

But I haven't been paying any attention to any of that, so I'm wholly uninformed regarding how LW is planning to do manage their server side requirements...
 
Very much an impossible fantasy here.
But wouldn't it be great if Paizo made a deal with LW in which every book they sell comes with a key to HeroLab, and give a percentage of the sale to LoneWolf?
Even at like 1% they'd probably do pretty well.
 
Has there been any official word about a HeroLab version for the P2e playtest?
I was guessing no, since the rules could change so much for the 2e release, but a friend heard a rumor that there will be one.
 
Has there been any official word about a HeroLab version for the P2e playtest?
I was guessing no, since the rules could change so much for the 2e release, but a friend heard a rumor that there will be one.

There was some mention on the forums somewhere that it will be available on Hero Lab Online (not classic/desktop).
 
The LW official announcement happened at PaizoCon and was posted by BJ so PF2 playtest is coming to HLO. Based on other comments from LW employees they are hard at work making it happen.

You can see that post HERE.
 
Very much an impossible fantasy here.
But wouldn't it be great if Paizo made a deal with LW in which every book they sell comes with a key to HeroLab, and give a percentage of the sale to LoneWolf?
Even at like 1% they'd probably do pretty well.

It would be exceedingly awesome if Paizo, Inc designated Herolab and Realmworks as it's officially supported digital management platforms. From there you would see alot of support for APIs and cross-platforming. As you say this is the dream we all would love to see happen.
 
It would be exceedingly awesome if Paizo, Inc designated Herolab and Realmworks as it's officially supported digital management platforms. From there you would see alot of support for APIs and cross-platforming. As you say this is the dream we all would love to see happen.

That, fundamentally, isn't all that different from what they already did with LW and PF1e. I'm pretty sure LW got early access to new books, and they paid a license fee to Paizo to produce digital forms of their content.
 
That, fundamentally, isn't all that different from what they already did with LW and PF1e. I'm pretty sure LW got early access to new books, and they paid a license fee to Paizo to produce digital forms of their content.

The thing is that while Paizo does give LW early access to things, there is no official endorsement.

I remember way back in the days of innocence when I bought my first D&D3e Player's Handbook that it had a disk in a cover-mounted insert that had character creation software on it. Now I can't remember anymore if WotC actually developed that, or if it was a third-party that got officially tapped by WotC to do it for them, but something like this should definitely be brainstormed by Paizo heads.

I'm not saying give out a free license or anything, but at the back of the book throw in a page that details herolab, its functionality, and offers shots of the UI. Something like this would get LW huge business in my opinion, and Paizo would see a huge benefit in having such a dedicated partner.

The main reason I say that this kind of 'prize in the cereal' approach would be good is that I searched for a good while to find a decent Pathfinder character generator, and I skipped over HLC quite a few times because of the UI in spite of the fact that plenty of people on forums/reddit had mentioned how it was invaluable to them. I did eventually give it a shot and have loved it enough to spend quite a penny or two on it. But it took years for LW to grab me as a customer. Years. That is a lot of lost revenue. That's a lot of time that I wasn't out there spreading the word to other GMs or players.

All of this being said, it's clear that I would love to see an officially endorsed partnership between Paizo and LW. It can mean nothing bad for the Pathfinder community, and I'm all for that.

Now the only issues with this would then be that (HLO at least) would become Paizo's proprietary platform, and LW could then not develop things for WotC products on it (or at least Paizo would be smart to include a stipulation like this.)

My two coppers.
 
The thing is that while Paizo does give LW early access to things, there is no official endorsement.

I remember way back in the days of innocence when I bought my first D&D3e Player's Handbook that it had a disk in a cover-mounted insert that had character creation software on it. Now I can't remember anymore if WotC actually developed that, or if it was a third-party that got officially tapped by WotC to do it for them, but something like this should definitely be brainstormed by Paizo heads.

I'm not saying give out a free license or anything, but at the back of the book throw in a page that details herolab, its functionality, and offers shots of the UI. Something like this would get LW huge business in my opinion, and Paizo would see a huge benefit in having such a dedicated partner.

The main reason I say that this kind of 'prize in the cereal' approach would be good is that I searched for a good while to find a decent Pathfinder character generator, and I skipped over HLC quite a few times because of the UI in spite of the fact that plenty of people on forums/reddit had mentioned how it was invaluable to them. I did eventually give it a shot and have loved it enough to spend quite a penny or two on it. But it took years for LW to grab me as a customer. Years. That is a lot of lost revenue. That's a lot of time that I wasn't out there spreading the word to other GMs or players.

All of this being said, it's clear that I would love to see an officially endorsed partnership between Paizo and LW. It can mean nothing bad for the Pathfinder community, and I'm all for that.

Now the only issues with this would then be that (HLO at least) would become Paizo's proprietary platform, and LW could then not develop things for WotC products on it (or at least Paizo would be smart to include a stipulation like this.)

My two coppers.
Just FYI that the only difference between what your saying and what is currently happening is the advertisement in books. Paizo will not do that for anyone but their own products. But Paizo and LW have an official and very strong partnership.

3PP and other products are highlighted on the Paizo Blog including HL and RW. HL is used internally by Paizo developers to create statblocks for books. Its talked about everywhere as the go to Pathfinder character creation software and has an official Pathfinder license hence the reason it has an official Pathfinder image.

Guess I don't see "its advertised in the back of a book" as any type of game changer in the year 2018.... Or I am totally confused on what your saying... :)
 
I would NOT want Paizo to 'officialize' any given 3rd party product, for fear it would discourage development of other alternatives. Leaving the landscape open makes for better products for all.

As an example, I fully expect a large number of pf2e character generators to come about in the next year or two - and based on the number of people who dislike HLO's model, I can see a number of them doing just fine.
 
Just wanted to jump on this thread and cast the votes of the 10+ people I play with who use Herolab classic for pf1e. Specifically we ask that you please bring pf2e to herolab classic. Please charge us more per data package as a subscription based model is dead on arrival for us. So is an online only solution like HLO as we frequently have internet issues. If Pf2e/starfinder were both in herolab classic you'd have all of our money for many more years to come.
 
I would NOT want Paizo to 'officialize' any given 3rd party product, for fear it would discourage development of other alternatives. Leaving the landscape open makes for better products for all.

As an example, I fully expect a large number of pf2e character generators to come about in the next year or two - and based on the number of people who dislike HLO's model, I can see a number of them doing just fine.

You mean like the huge amount of generators that came out for Pathfinder Version 1?
 
Just wanted to jump on this thread and cast the votes of the 10+ people I play with who use Herolab classic for pf1e. Specifically we ask that you please bring pf2e to herolab classic. Please charge us more per data package as a subscription based model is dead on arrival for us. So is an online only solution like HLO as we frequently have internet issues. If Pf2e/starfinder were both in herolab classic you'd have all of our money for many more years to come.

Not going to happen. With the reduced staff they have, no further work is going to be put in to Herolab Classic other than bugfixes for the next year or so. Classic is at pretty much end of life.

This also allows them to not have to worry further MacOS and IOS support since they'll just be supporting one platform... the web.
 
Not going to happen. With the reduced staff they have, no further work is going to be put in to Herolab Classic other than bugfixes for the next year or so. Classic is at pretty much end of life.

This also allows them to not have to worry further MacOS and IOS support since they'll just be supporting one platform... the web.
Again please do not spread false information as if it was fact. You can say “I think that this wont be supported.” But it’s NOT been said by LW and based on how long they are still supporting Army builder your statement is totally incorrect.

On top of this the CORE engine of HLO is exactly the same as HLC. This means as was recently done with Unique ID’s, HLC gets the same Improvment as HLO does. So again what LW is actually doing contradicts what you are saying.
 
HLC future

Just wanted to jump on this thread and cast the votes of the 10+ people I play with who use Herolab classic for pf1e. Specifically we ask that you please bring pf2e to herolab classic. Please charge us more per data package as a subscription based model is dead on arrival for us. So is an online only solution like HLO as we frequently have internet issues. If Pf2e/starfinder were both in herolab classic you'd have all of our money for many more years to come.

Our group thinks alike. we wont be using HLO for any product. if HLC wont support PF2 we will find other solutions. Even Excel sheets will be better than HLO.

I do hope that HL will continue investing in HLC. I must say that since HLO I sense that there wont be any further development in new materials to the HLC, and thus, I am looking for another software. thanks for 15 years of fun playing, but it seems our paths must separate. :(
 
Have any members had trouble logging into the store recently. I sent herolab a email about my problem. Just wanted to know if anyone else had any issues. I am planning on buying HLO as soon as the store will let me. I wish PF2 was avaible on HLC.
 
Back
Top