A
armybuilder at yahoogroup
Guest
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 2 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Re: Restricting options or adding types remotely.
From: "Brian Adamson" <brian.a@pacific.net.au>
2. Re: Restricting options or adding types remotely.
From: Versif <petark@ntlworld.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 03:11:37 -0000
From: "Brian Adamson" <brian.a@pacific.net.au>
Subject: Re: Restricting options or adding types remotely.
--- In armybuilder@yahoogroups.com, Versif <petark@n...> wrote:
> Brian Adamson writes
> >I'm pretty sure that'll fix that up. (We'll see as soon as i
> >implement it later today)
> >
> Sounds good.
Pity i ended up lying about it going to get done later that day.
My brother walked in soon after i posted and told me the book i was
reading was overdue and unable to be renewed because it was reserved
by half a dozen people (also meaning that if it went back to the
library I wouldn't see it for at least a vcouple of months) and so
I've spent the last ouple of days just trying to knock that book off.
> And I'm putting all the doctrines are in a conflict group of size
> 5.(Sure beats raising stats then making a lcmp test for it.)
>
>
> But they aren't
The regiments allow more than the standard 5 to
> be taken.
>
> Tanith get 7 for example. Mordian 6 IIRC.
>
Good point, however i was thinking of having them as separate lists
like they currently are. Also if i do integrate them into the one
file i could put itst:!type=SpecReg or utyp:!SpecReg in all the
doctine choices, then have an option for each regiment that simulates
all the doctrines given to the particular regiment, as well as
type:SpecReg.
Also just one question, hiding an option has no effect on its
currently selection state, so you could click an option that makes a
list of options appear (via the 'show' attribute), select some of
them then close this submenu once more, right?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 11:37:27 +0100
From: Versif <petark@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Restricting options or adding types remotely.
Brian Adamson writes
>Also just one question, hiding an option has no effect on its
>currently selection state, so you could click an option that makes a
>list of options appear (via the 'show' attribute), select some of
>them then close this submenu once more, right?
I've not used show in this way so I couldn't vouch for it. Since all it
is doing is making the option visible/invisible it sounds as if it
should work. That said, my experience is that when selecting and
deselecting options introduced by another, deselecting the parent option
removes the child options. These are probably introduced by 'more'. Easy
enough to try out though
Cheers
--
Versif, Nightgoblin backstabber and all round coward, but nice with it.
Kirkby-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire - whaddya mean, Robin Hood wasn't a goblin?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 2 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Re: Restricting options or adding types remotely.
From: "Brian Adamson" <brian.a@pacific.net.au>
2. Re: Restricting options or adding types remotely.
From: Versif <petark@ntlworld.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 03:11:37 -0000
From: "Brian Adamson" <brian.a@pacific.net.au>
Subject: Re: Restricting options or adding types remotely.
--- In armybuilder@yahoogroups.com, Versif <petark@n...> wrote:
> Brian Adamson writes
> >I'm pretty sure that'll fix that up. (We'll see as soon as i
> >implement it later today)
> >
> Sounds good.
Pity i ended up lying about it going to get done later that day.
My brother walked in soon after i posted and told me the book i was
reading was overdue and unable to be renewed because it was reserved
by half a dozen people (also meaning that if it went back to the
library I wouldn't see it for at least a vcouple of months) and so
I've spent the last ouple of days just trying to knock that book off.
> And I'm putting all the doctrines are in a conflict group of size
> 5.(Sure beats raising stats then making a lcmp test for it.)
>
>
> But they aren't
The regiments allow more than the standard 5 to> be taken.
>
> Tanith get 7 for example. Mordian 6 IIRC.
>
Good point, however i was thinking of having them as separate lists
like they currently are. Also if i do integrate them into the one
file i could put itst:!type=SpecReg or utyp:!SpecReg in all the
doctine choices, then have an option for each regiment that simulates
all the doctrines given to the particular regiment, as well as
type:SpecReg.
Also just one question, hiding an option has no effect on its
currently selection state, so you could click an option that makes a
list of options appear (via the 'show' attribute), select some of
them then close this submenu once more, right?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 11:37:27 +0100
From: Versif <petark@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Restricting options or adding types remotely.
Brian Adamson writes
>Also just one question, hiding an option has no effect on its
>currently selection state, so you could click an option that makes a
>list of options appear (via the 'show' attribute), select some of
>them then close this submenu once more, right?
I've not used show in this way so I couldn't vouch for it. Since all it
is doing is making the option visible/invisible it sounds as if it
should work. That said, my experience is that when selecting and
deselecting options introduced by another, deselecting the parent option
removes the child options. These are probably introduced by 'more'. Easy
enough to try out though
Cheers
--
Versif, Nightgoblin backstabber and all round coward, but nice with it.
Kirkby-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire - whaddya mean, Robin Hood wasn't a goblin?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/