• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

Digest Number 689

  • Thread starter Thread starter armybuilder at yahoogroup
  • Start date Start date
A

armybuilder at yahoogroup

Guest
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/orkH0C/n97DAA/Ey.GAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, email

armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are 2 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. Re: Toughness advances in Mordheim.
From: "archeonicus" <h.faessen@hccnet.nl>
2. Comp rule question.
From: "Keith" <mobo@adelphia.net>


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:00:22 -0000
From: "archeonicus" <h.faessen@hccnet.nl>
Subject: Re: Toughness advances in Mordheim.

--- In armybuilder@y..., Joseph Prozinski <prozinskij@y...> wrote:
> You aren't going to win this argument! It's been
> addressed here many times in the past. I'd ask the
> specialist games group at GW to clarify it, if you
> really feel they should be able to do it this way. If
> they agree with you and then publish it, it will get
> changed. Otherwise you are out of luck.
>
> -Joe

Well Joe, apart from already winning... :-)
No really the rule clearly states as it is, furthermore no FAQs or
such declare anything different.
My only question is why it was not possible and Jon answered that for
me. Though i never worked on datafiles before, I think I'll manage,
one way or the other...

Anybody suggestions in the how to directions?

Archeonicus



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 06:38:56 -0600
From: "Keith" <mobo@adelphia.net>
Subject: Comp rule question.

Hello, Here's a little back ground info:

There are two comp groups, A and B. Your army must have 2-4 units from comp A. Your army may have up to one unit from comp B. For each unit form comp A your can have one unit from any where in the army list. This could be another unit form comp B.

The question:

How do I get AB to only allow 0-1 unit from comp B and up to three more units form comp be when a matching number of units are from comp A? I don't want the user to be able to just select 4 units form comp B with out having the right amounts of units form comp A.

There is what I am currently using for a comp rule:

HQ:umin=1,Cmbt:umin=2&umax=4,Sprt:umin=0&umax=1,Divl:urelu<=Cmbt

As you can see, it meets the first half of my comp rule but does not allow for the extra units form comp B due to there being "x" number of units form comp A.

Hope this makes some since.


Thanks,

Keith




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
Back
Top