So, White Dwarf is incorrect? The save for the Fenris Wolf is listed
as 3+ in WD231. Is this, in fact, incorrect? If so, has the
correction been published in a later issue?
Thanks!
Mike
"grimnar83" <grimnar8-@mindspring.com> wrote:
original article:[url]http://www.egroups.com/group/armybuilder/?start=543[/url]
> 3+ is wolf guard not wolves.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <dm.hopkins@usa.net>
> To: <armybuilder@eGroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 5:44 PM
> Subject: [AB] Re: 40k: Fenrisian Wolves
>
>
> > 'not colin' mcalister & the skrills <demandre-@skrill.org> wrote:
> >
> > > >Is there an error in the 40k files under Space Wolves for the
> > Fenrisian
> > > >Wolves' (upgrade for Wolf Lord) armor save? Army Builder says
6+.
> > I'm
> > > >pretty sure the WD rules for SW said 3+.
> > >
> > > I'm almost 100% sure that wolves don't have a 3+ save :)
> > >
> > > I think there were rumours on Portent.net that implied something,
> > > though.
> > >
> > > <checks>
> > >
> > > Nope, only a 6+ save. Sorry.
> >
> >
> > I just checked WD231 & WD234 Chapter APproved articles about the
Space
> > Wolves and the Fenris Wolf is listed as a +10 point upgrade to the
HQ
> > and it's save is listed as 3+. I know the Wolf Pelt is a 6+
> > invulnerable, but I'm asking about the actual wolves that you can
take
> > as "ablative armor" for your wolf lord....
> >
> > AB datafiles say 6+ for these guys, the codex preview in WD says
3+...
> >
> >
> > Mike
>