Guest
Posts: n/a
|
First of dont flame me, and just pointing something
out. In White Dwarf 252, Paul Sawyer took a Scout squad with 4 Sniper Rifles and 1 Heavy Bolter, ie the Sergeant was arm with a Sniper Rifle. As this was in a battle report, I was thinking that maybe you could take Scout Sergeant with a Sniper Rifle. How about letting the Scout Sergeant choice from the Scout Weapons and then it up to the player to decide if 2 use them or not, with his oppenents. Personal around here, we have decide to allow them, because it seem's stupid having a Sniper Squad and the Sergeant having a Bolt Pistol. David __________________________________________________ __________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> In White Dwarf 252, Paul Sawyer took a Scout squad
> with 4 Sniper Rifles and 1 Heavy Bolter, ie the > Sergeant was arm with a Sniper Rifle. Yes he did. And he also disembarked a squad from a Rhino and shot the squad's heavy weapon at an enemy. And he ranted and raged about being attacked by the BTs, yet failed to notice he shot at the BTs first!! GW batrep's arent the best evidence for changing anything - in most cases, they just show what complete gubbers the studio staff are when they cant follow the rulebook/codexes :-) Jimi FREE 40k card buildings - http://www.crosswinds.net/~astronomican/ 40k3 - http://www.egroups.com/group/40k3/info.html 40k Fluff - http://www.egroups.com/group/40k_fluff/info.html Astartes - http://www.egroups.com/group/adeptus_astartes/info.html Grey Knights - http://www.egroups.com/group/greykni...pter/info.html Imperial Guard - http://www.egroups.com/group/imperial-guard/info.html Sons Of Russ - http://www.egroups.com/group/sons-of-russ/info.html Unforgiven - http://www.egroups.com/group/unforgiven/info.html VDR - http://www.egroups.com/group/gw-vdr/info.html To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No more stupid than if you let the sergeant of a devastator squad take a
heavy weapon. The sergeant is there for leadership primarily, to organize the unit into an effective fighting unit. How is he going to control the actions of the squad if he is all nestled behind a sniper scope. Hope you don't think I'm flaming. Just joining the conversation. Paul. -----Original Message----- From: David Wyatt-Millington [mailto:xaxier_uk@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 5:57 AM To: ab@support.wolflair.com Subject: [AB] Scout Snipers First of dont flame me, and just pointing something out. In White Dwarf 252, Paul Sawyer took a Scout squad with 4 Sniper Rifles and 1 Heavy Bolter, ie the Sergeant was arm with a Sniper Rifle. As this was in a battle report, I was thinking that maybe you could take Scout Sergeant with a Sniper Rifle. How about letting the Scout Sergeant choice from the Scout Weapons and then it up to the player to decide if 2 use them or not, with his oppenents. Personal around here, we have decide to allow them, because it seem's stupid having a Sniper Squad and the Sergeant having a Bolt Pistol. David __________________________________________________ __________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The different is that the Scout Choice in the Army
list say "Any Model in the Unit" not Marine which is the usally statement. No dont think Flaming, that when goes to a personal level. Me I think it a choice between group that u play with. but i would like the option in the Army Builder files so I dont have to alter them. I always make sure my oppenent doesnt mind about it, and if he does, I have a secondary Scout Sergant on Hand. > The sergeant is there for leadership primarily, to > organize the unit into an > effective fighting unit. How is he going to control > the actions of the > squad if he is all nestled behind a sniper scope. __________________________________________________ __________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fair enough =]
Good Hunting, Paul -----Original Message----- From: David Wyatt-Millington [mailto:xaxier_uk@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 8:28 AM To: ab@support.wolflair.com Subject: RE: [AB] Scout Snipers The different is that the Scout Choice in the Army list say "Any Model in the Unit" not Marine which is the usally statement. No dont think Flaming, that when goes to a personal level. Me I think it a choice between group that u play with. but i would like the option in the Army Builder files so I dont have to alter them. I always make sure my oppenent doesnt mind about it, and if he does, I have a secondary Scout Sergant on Hand. > The sergeant is there for leadership primarily, to > organize the unit into an > effective fighting unit. How is he going to control > the actions of the > squad if he is all nestled behind a sniper scope. __________________________________________________ __________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In a message dated 01/10/2001 4:57:44 AM Central Standard Time,
xaxier_uk@yahoo.co.uk writes: << Personal around here, we have decide to allow them, because it seem's stupid having a Sniper Squad and the Sergeant having a Bolt Pistol. >> You guys should really read the codex a little better. It clearly states twice that this is NOT allowed. "Fat Bloke" Sawyer is just a cheater To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
At 13:28 10/01/2001 +0000, you wrote:
>The different is that the Scout Choice in the Army >list say "Any Model in the Unit" not Marine which is >the usally statement. No dont think Flaming, that when >goes to a personal level. Me I think it a choice >between group that u play with. but i would like the >option in the Army Builder files so I dont have to >alter them. I always make sure my oppenent doesnt mind >about it, and if he does, I have a secondary Scout >Sergant on Hand. As Jimi says, White Dwarf is often not particularly reliable as a source of things like this. The order of feasibility goes: Chapter Approved / GW FAQ / game designer says so (most reliable) White Dwarf Battle Reports Some Bloke You Met In The Pub Roolzboyz People you meet in pub are more reliable than Roolzboyz, since they'll probably just pick randomly rather than using their amazing psychic powers to work out what the wrong answer is. -- 'Not Colin' McAlister - License to Skrill Email: demandred@skrill.org | Visit http://www.skrill.org/ today! -----------------------------+------------------------------------ "Dovie'andi se tovya sagain" - Robert Jordan's Wheel Of Time To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You missed a few steps out :-)
> Chapter Approved / GW FAQ / game designer says so (most reliable) > White Dwarf Battle Reports > Some Bloke You Met In The Pub Family pet Amoeba specimen in laboratory The contents of your hankerchief after blowing your nose Lawyer > Roolzboyz :-P Jimi FREE 40k card buildings - http://www.crosswinds.net/~astronomican/ 40k3 - http://www.egroups.com/group/40k3/info.html 40k Fluff - http://www.egroups.com/group/40k_fluff/info.html Astartes - http://www.egroups.com/group/adeptus_astartes/info.html Grey Knights - http://www.egroups.com/group/greykni...pter/info.html Imperial Guard - http://www.egroups.com/group/imperial-guard/info.html Sons Of Russ - http://www.egroups.com/group/sons-of-russ/info.html Unforgiven - http://www.egroups.com/group/unforgiven/info.html VDR - http://www.egroups.com/group/gw-vdr/info.html To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Yes he did. And he also disembarked a squad from a Rhino and shot
the > squad's heavy weapon at an enemy. I have always thought that disembarking from a vehicle (that didn't move) was NOT considered movement. Hence if the vehicle was at a stop you could deploy and fire heavy weapons. The rules (on page 81) state troops disembarking (from a vehicle that hasn't moved) can move as normal. I think the battle reports are somewhat "edited" to spice them up without considering the effect they can have with your local rules lawyer. Many of them talk about playing the scenario several times in a row. Not exactly a bad way to spend your "work" day. Tom To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> I have always thought that disembarking from a vehicle (that
> didn't move) was NOT considered movement. Hence if the vehicle was at > a stop you could deploy and fire heavy weapons. The rules (on page > 81) state troops disembarking (from a vehicle that hasn't moved) can > move as normal. Its still movement as far as weapons are concerned. > I think the battle reports are somewhat "edited" to spice them up > without considering the effect they can have with your local rules > lawyer. Got nothing to do with 'rules lawyers' - more to do with GW employees not following the rulebook produced by the company that pays their wages. Not exactly a glowing endorsement of said rules when the staff openly ignore them. > Many of them talk about playing the scenario several times in > a row. Yup - they need the right result for their fixed games (ref Paul Sawyer's game in the recent campaign) > Not exactly a bad way to spend your "work" day. I wouldnt mind doing it - I get paid to play fixed games using my own creation of the rules, get my photo in White Dwarf doing some ridiculous pose and have a dumb name so that the munchkins think I'm cool (Jimi Fart-Pants has always been a favourite of mine - yes, my farts do stink really bad). As you said, not a bad way to spend your "work" day. Jimi FREE 40k card buildings - http://www.crosswinds.net/~astronomican/ 40k3 - http://www.egroups.com/group/40k3/info.html 40k Fluff - http://www.egroups.com/group/40k_fluff/info.html Astartes - http://www.egroups.com/group/adeptus_astartes/info.html Grey Knights - http://www.egroups.com/group/greykni...pter/info.html Imperial Guard - http://www.egroups.com/group/imperial-guard/info.html Sons Of Russ - http://www.egroups.com/group/sons-of-russ/info.html Unforgiven - http://www.egroups.com/group/unforgiven/info.html VDR - http://www.egroups.com/group/gw-vdr/info.html To unsubscribe from this group, email armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com |
#10 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Marine Scout Sergant Question | rricker at prodigy.net | Army Builder | 3 | September 17th, 2000 08:18 PM |