Teamwork feats

[Minous]

Is it possible for an option to hide all teamwork feats? Most of my characters dont use them, and it would be nice to not have them clutter my feat list.

 

[Aaron]

As far as I know, that isn't an option.

 

[Minous]

As far as I know, that isn't an option.

I know it isn't an option currently. But how would one go about both hiding them and listing it as an option on the configure character screen?

 

[Mathias]

I know it isn't an option currently. But how would one go about both hiding them and listing it as an option on the configure character screen?

If it were that simple, it would already be in Hero Lab.

The closest you could come would be to use the *Preclude tab to exclude them all when a certain source was on - but that's not hiding, that's pretending those feats don't exist, so if you accidentally opened a character with a teamwork feat and added that, you've just removed those feats from the character. It also requires someone to type in the id of each feat individually, so it's not really practical.

Allowing filtering and sorting of tables - all tables - is a project we've always wanted to do, but implementing it is a very large project.

 

[Minous]

There isnt something that can be done similar to how firearms are hidden? using fCategory.teamwork

 

[Mathias]

There isnt something that can be done similar to how firearms are hidden? using fCategory.teamwork

That's not something a user can change.

 

[Minous]

That's not something a user can change.

Well crap. Is there a way to iterate over all feats in a category and add a tag it? IE add Helper.NoPathSoc so at least they can be filtered via the "only valid" default filter?

 

[Quintain]

Mathias,

Is there a way to do a "negative" filter? Could this particular user put in a -"teamwork" to remove any feat that has teamwork in it's text?

 

[TheIronGolem]

Not at my HL machine right now so I can't try this, but maybe you could use Extend Thing to apply Helper.Helper to the feats in question? You'd have to do it individually, feat-by-feat, but it might do the job.

 

[Minous]

Im just shocked that there isnt a way to apply something based on categorization. I know firearms does it, just surprised its written in a way that that rule cannot be reused.