• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

Image information

A

AEIOU

Well-known member
It would be lovely to be able to get image dimensions so we can replace images with the same size again. Right now I put (10000x30000) in the image description to tell me the pixels but that's rather heavy-handed and ugly.

I would really like to know the size of grids as well to make it more VTT friendly. So for battlemaps, I tend to put (4000x2000x100) to denote 100 pixel squares.

Finally, it would be helpful to know the size. It's taking forever to load and it doesn't LOOK very big. Ahhhh!!! Look at the size. It's huge!
 
That would be nice. I would prefer it to be something available and hover-over bubble, rather than have image metadata automatically added to annotation snippet.
 
A wrench option?

Something like "Picture info" and then you get a window with (among others) size, bitplanes, name, location of the original ("clipboard" if it came from there, otherwise path and file name if loaded) - any other info.

Something like that.

Make the text in the window copy'able so you can easily extract the info.
 
Vargr said:
A wrench option?
Click to expand...

That would work as well. If you find yourself needing this information a lot, however, that would be less convenient than a mouse-hover popup or having the information in the annotation field for the image snippet. Since I don't need this information often, hiding away as a wrench option would be fine by me. I would expect most users would not need to pull this information very often.
 
I imagine an hover-over would quickly become cluttered if you have a lot of info plus I imagine it would be easier to add new info to a window.

Besides, you can mark and copy text from a window, not from a hover over.

But why not both? Hover-over with basic information (size?) and a wrench option (or similar) for those wanting to dig deep.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top