Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oak Harbor, WA, USA
Posts: 616
|
I fully understand that LW needs to make money, I just think the price is a little pricey.
Quote:
Quote:
I did point out that it is a little cheaper with the subscription, but you still have to pay shipping for each hard copy. It totals to $134.28 for a complete Adventure Path. Add HL and you've dropped nearly $160 for an Adventure Path. |
||
#41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,623
|
You could do all the work yourself. How long would it take?
At $5/hour (or equivalent), you would only get 10 hours of work done before you reach the price of the LWD package. |
#42 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 68
|
I'm more often a player than a GM, so conversely, in a way yes, I do "pay" my GMs
I supply the place to play, the minis, the battlemap[s], have a few hundred spare dice laying around if someone needs, and will often spot another player or GM for dinner or a couple drinks if they're short on cash I play with friends, so don't expect them to bankroll my fun, and am happy to help my friends have fun with me, when I can afford to. They, in return, thank me by appreciating when I do that kind of thing, instead of expecting it. We're getting off-topic here, though, so I'd prefer not continuing to discuss gamer-group dynamics in a thread about a launch of a wonderful new addition to HL |
#43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 345
|
Quote:
NOW, that being said, having put in a TON of stuff into both HL (hard) and RW (easy, but time consuming) I don't think $25 is outrageous for what amounts to a YEAR of play material. You have to look at it not just in a "how much does it cost" but also in a "how long will it last?" Nobody is going to go out and pick up this package for $25 and NOT use it. I purchased EVERY Paizo package for HL (save Mythic) because, A: I wanted it, and B: I might use it in any number of games. I won't be picking this up for say, Kingmaker, because I'm not going to run Kingmaker. I'd buy it for RotRL, Emerald Spire, and maybe the new Giants one (thinking HARD about doing that one after RotRL). And at $25 that's at least a YEAR of sessions (we got through book 2 in RotRL in about 5 months playing every other week). You're paying about $2/month for easy access to official tools to run the AP. The price isn't a problem, it's the librarian in all of us that says, "Dude, new book, I need that!" (those of us that bought Blood Dimmed Tides for WoD know who we are). You don't NEED this package, unless you're running the AP. As to RW integration and pricing complaints. Yeah, you're spending over $300 on the books and then another (my guess is $50) for the RW version (if/when they come out). Is that a lot? Yeah. But what else were you gonna do with that money? Go to a bar? Roleplaying is an expensive hobby, and to be frank (or Bill, or John) sometimes it's hard to justify purchasing a new pack of Pathfinder Pawns. But I ask again, what else would you spend the money on? Bars? Strippers? Blackjack? Whenever my wife complains about how much I spend on my hobby, I point out that she buys 3 bottles of wine per month on average. So anywhere from $40-$60 a month. She also Knits (another $20-$40/month). I buy gaming stuff at about the same cost. I don't go out and blow $100 at the bar, I don't drink, I don't gamble, I don't do drugs. I play a game that costs a bit to maintain, but it's MY hobby, it's MY outlet. She gets it. And, I say to you, you don't HAVE to buy the encounter. It's not ABSOLUTELY needed. It's just handy, and helpful. hell, you don't NEED HL or RW, it's just handy, and helpful. |
|
#44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 781
|
Quote:
If GMs get things blown up and printed, we have taken a collection to help with those costs, or the GM didn't chip in for pizza a few weeks in a row. Also every player is responsible for their own players books, materials and dice. Everyone one of us has their own HL licenses, dont buy HL, use paper, sheets don't meet standards? XP loss incoming. Paizo provides sheets you can copy, no reason you can't have a sheet up to snuff. Is there a member that may get away cheaper than others? Yes I am sure there is. But it's not too big of a deal from high to low. Exmortis aka "Scott" RW - Needs Rez spell HL - Game Master/Designer RPG Tools - Campaign Cartographer 3+, D20 Pro Ultimate Real Life - IT Security Hobby - Anything on water or ATV |
|
#45 |
Ex-Staff
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 961
|
Quote:
We built the Rise of the Runelords package completely in-house. For future adventure paths we may do things differently, but only in partnership with whoever entered the original portfolios. |
|
#46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 165
|
Quote:
Is there a legal reason why these community files would become unavailable? I.E. is there some new reason we can't share our AP portfolios or is it just a matter of not wanting some possible conflicting files on community and not wanting to maintain them with official versions? |
|
#47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Quebec, QC, Canada
Posts: 464
|
Will the new "official" encounter portfolios be customizable? I often modify AP encounters to give them a new twist, or to make them harder: toss in a template here, a class level there... Will this be possible?
|
#48 |
Member
|
Quote:
I do not agree that LW should have any say at all in what the community can and cannot bring out themselves. I, as a consumer have every right make an informed choice on where to get my stuff, and I feel that LW is trying to bully the community to be the only provider. I have it backed up on my server, but I've been forced to remove the link to it, so I did. I will also reiterate my point that $25 is WAY too much if you already own all needed packages. They should give a serious discount for those that already own the sources needed, a $10 discount would be nice. I've also seen some reasoning above that the price is fine given the amount of time you will be spending with it, but that argument is disingenuous at best. If you keep playing pathfinder forever you will be using the core package forever, so should the base hero lab package cost $infinity? My point is that amount of time you we be spending with material should have no bearing on the price. Then there's the argument that you would be over the cost after 5 hours of your own time, but that ignore two important factors: The first is that this was not made bespoke for one person, it was made to sell en masse. The second is that data entry in hero lab is a mostly mindless job from prior experience, I can do it while watching movies, which means that it's not actually using "billable time", therefore the opportunity cost doesn't fly. In the end I see the fact that they will charge the same price to the guy that just bought pathfinder core as the guy that has spent at least $324.70 (at least because I seem to have misplaced some mails) as contempt for the loyal customer and the strong-arming of the community as abuse of their monopoly on character building tools. Last edited by Villadelfia; April 14th, 2015 at 01:45 PM. |
|
#49 |
Ex-Staff
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 961
|
@Lord Magus, yes the encounters and portfolios will be fully customizable.
@ValaraukarU, files for adventure paths that we sell will no longer be hosted and maintained in the Community Repository. There are no other reasons the files will no longer be available - as with anything else we sell for Hero Lab, anyone is free to build their own versions if they wish. Regarding Villadelfia’s post: Everyone here is welcome to share their thoughts and feedback about our new Adventure Path package (and other subjects), as we’ve demonstrated in this thread. We always love to see users sharing content that they’ve created, but just as we’d ask forum members not to link to content that we or our partners sell, it should be obvious that links (and posts) like this are not appropriate on our forums. I’ve reached out to Villadelfia asking him to remove the link, and I’m honestly a bit shocked and disappointed to see this kind of behavior from a member of our community. I hope it’s clear how this post crossed the line. Last edited by liz; April 14th, 2015 at 02:07 PM. Reason: Clarifying language and the decision that was made in response to ValaraukarU |
#50 |
|
|