Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8
|
Some typo type things I've noticed.
Rob |
#11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9
|
Not sure if it's been considered and discarded, but it would be really handy if each stat line also included the reference to the troop type of the unit. I've still not got used to the new definitions for some of the units and would find this pretty handy.
|
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 38
|
Good Idea. Must be.
|
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1
|
i noticed that the Enchanted shield is not in the Ogres list. Is there a reason?
|
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 243
|
Armour of Silvered Steel is buggy as heck right now.
Its a 2+ armour save that cannot be improved. For the armies I tested it with it does confer the 2+ armor save but then can be improved with shields and other armor. This isnt correct. The exception army that I found is Skaven. In the Skaven army it does not list the armor save as a 2+ but as a 4+ for the Warlord and the Chieftain. It seems that this postlink ~ if heavy armor is not selected, remove its save bonus if (option[HeavyArmNS].selection = 0) then stat[Save] += 2 endif is causing the conflict. It works just like all the other armies (2+ improvable) for all the other Skaven characters who may select magic armor. Any help would be appreciated to get this issue fixed for the Skaven file atm. Last edited by Yobtar; September 19th, 2010 at 03:00 PM. |
#15 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 38
|
Shield of Ptolos still calculates wrong armor save in character profile. It is a normal shield with special fixed armor save, ex. 4+ (*1+). I guess it is easier than what it seems to be set right.
|
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
~var result as number ~result = parent.assign[Helper.ArmorFix1] parent.stat[Save] = 2 obviously this sets the save to 2+ but still allows it to be modifiable. The conflict it seems to me is that while one says to make it a 2+ the other says that since HvyArmor is removed the save should be modified by +2 thereby resulting in the erroneous save of 4+ in the stats. I could really use some help getting this fixed. |
|
#17 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Author
|
I'll have a look at this today. Been a hectic week!
|
#18 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 35
|
The warbanner has the incorrect cost in a multitude of armies.
The ones I can confirm are as follows: Vampire Counts currently 35pts should be 25pts (VC p84) Skaven currently 35pts should be 25pts (SK p109) Beastmen currently 35pts should be 25pts (BM p92) Warriors of Chaos currently 35pts should be 25pts (WoC p112) High Elves and Wood Elves are correct. This bug is based on BRB p500 whch says the points value for items in both books is the value in the army book, not the BRB. I suspect other armies are in correct, but these are the only books I own. |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 94
|
Wording for Lore of Heavens for Rolling Skies needs cleaned up.
|
#20 |
|
|