Yahoo! Auto Response

[ulita_carre at yahoo.com]

Autoresponder: i am not at the office, vacation!

Offers and propositions place at http://amor.bloodway.com
More pictures of mine look at http://amor.bloodway.net

--------------------


Original Message:


X-Track: 2: 40
Received: from n1.groups.yahoo.com (HELO hh.egroups.com) (216.115.96.51)
by mta536.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 May 2001 00:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-1399234-3227-990515022-ulita_carre=yahoo.com@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.53] by hh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 22 May 2001 07:03:43 -0000
X-Sender: rob@wolflair.com
X-Apparently-To: armybuilder@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 22 May 2001 07:03:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 22491 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 07:03:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 May 2001 07:03:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO daserver.xlonewolf.com) (63.201.148.50) by mta3 with SMTP; 22 May 2001 07:03:40 -0000
Received: from dabeast.wolflair.com ([192.168.1.3]) by daserver.xlonewolf.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1); Mon, 21 May 2001 23:58:40 -0700
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010521235847.02b9ae48@pop.onemain.com>
X-Sender: rb1009510@pop.onemain.com
X-Mailer:
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

 

[Wolfbane at hem.passagen.]

ulita_carre@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Autoresponder: i am not at the office, vacation!
>
> Offers and propositions place at http://amor.bloodway.com
> More pictures of mine look at http://amor.bloodway.net

Can somebody(moderator?) please unsubscribe this person?

/Peter

 

[cbeilby at hroads.net]

Rob, could we get this guy set to not send as long as the autoresponder is
in operation?

 

[cbeilby at hroads.net]

> It is just another subscriber who gets his AB mail at work. He probably
has
> to have the aut-response on beacuase of work and being away. There is
enough
> worthless AB messages that I really doubt this one makes a difference,
just
> delete it as any other meaningless chatter.
>
Which is why I suggest that, instead of unsubscribing, I suggested that Rob
set him to be unable to post until he is contacted by the subscriber with
the autoresponder.

And also, keep in mind, that when an autoresponder goes unchecked on a list,
that it DOUBLES the amount of email traffic that the list processes, as the
responder responds to EVERY single email that it recieves.

 

[doublenot7 at aol.com]

It is just another subscriber who gets his AB mail at work. He probably has
to have the aut-response on beacuase of work and being away. There is enough
worthless AB messages that I really doubt this one makes a difference, just
delete it as any other meaningless chatter.

How would you like it if you got unsubscribed when you didn't want to be?
Darren


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 

[cbeilby at hroads.net]

> It also typically only happens once per email address. So we'll likely
not
> see his autoresponder again, regardless of whether his status is changed
or
> not.

Try telling that to the autoresponders we get over at the Gundam Mailing
List.

 

[eric at landesfamily.com]

At 08:09 AM 5/22/01 -0400, Christopher Beilby wrote:


> > It is just another subscriber who gets his AB mail at work. He probably
>has
> > to have the aut-response on beacuase of work and being away. There is
>enough
> > worthless AB messages that I really doubt this one makes a difference,
>just
> > delete it as any other meaningless chatter.
> >
>Which is why I suggest that, instead of unsubscribing, I suggested that Rob
>set him to be unable to post until he is contacted by the subscriber with
>the autoresponder.
>
>And also, keep in mind, that when an autoresponder goes unchecked on a list,
>that it DOUBLES the amount of email traffic that the list processes, as the
>responder responds to EVERY single email that it recieves.

It also typically only happens once per email address. So we'll likely not
see his autoresponder again, regardless of whether his status is changed or
not.

Eric

 

[demandred at skrill.org]

At 07:59 22/05/2001 -0400, you wrote:

<snip>

> There is enough
>worthless AB messages that I really doubt this one makes a difference,

If you find messages about AB to be "worthless", why are you on this list?


--
'Not Colin' McAlister - License to Skrill
Email: demandred@skrill.org | Visit http://www.skrill.org/ today!
-----------------------------+------------------------------------
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain" - Robert Jordan's Wheel Of Time

 

[Syksrep159 at cs.com]

Actually, if you look up a few messages, that 'person' spammed a porn
site in the message, and, when it got the message from the AB group
into it's yahoo mail, not any other provider, it auto-responded
another porn site or 2. All it is is a 'bot', like what you see in
Yahoo Chat, coming into a room, shooting out an ad for a porn site,
then disappearing. It's a common tactic for spammers. Rob, you need
to delete it from the group, it's not a real person, per se.

--- In armybuilder@y..., Eric Landes <eric@l...> wrote:
> At 08:09 AM 5/22/01 -0400, Christopher Beilby wrote:
>
>
> > > It is just another subscriber who gets his AB mail at work. He
probably
> >has
> > > to have the aut-response on beacuase of work and being away.
There is
> >enough
> > > worthless AB messages that I really doubt this one makes a
difference,
> >just
> > > delete it as any other meaningless chatter.
> > >
> >Which is why I suggest that, instead of unsubscribing, I suggested
that Rob
> >set him to be unable to post until he is contacted by the
subscriber with
> >the autoresponder.
> >
> >And also, keep in mind, that when an autoresponder goes unchecked
on a list,
> >that it DOUBLES the amount of email traffic that the list
processes, as the
> >responder responds to EVERY single email that it recieves.
>
> It also typically only happens once per email address. So we'll
likely not
> see his autoresponder again, regardless of whether his status is
changed or
> not.
>
> Eric