• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

Tryanid mutable warriors question

  • Thread starter Thread starter mgrosh at mindspring.com
  • Start date Start date
M

mgrosh at mindspring.com

Guest
Hey everyone. I got a response from the rulez boyz. I think that the faq
question that origionally made the makers of the AB data files decide to not
have a unit of warriors with only one heavy weapon count as heavy support
instead of elite was poorly written and although wrong was not wrong in a
way as to affect a unit from being elite with just one heavy weapon. he is
my origional letter and response from the rulez boyz.

colen.. Can this be fixed for the next release of the data files?

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Roolzboyz [mailto:Roolzboyz@Games-Workshop.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 1:32 PM
To: ab@support.wolflair.com
Subject: RE: Tryanid mutable warriors question


All Warriors always have the option of being HQ... The first would be
Elite or HQ, The second would be Heavy or HQ.

Aaryk 'Draich-master' Drake
Games Workshop USA Customer Service Rep./'Roolz Boy'

"Lock up your children, shut all windows tight."
"The Witch Elves are hunting for victims tonight!"
"When old hags do knock at your door, you must hide,"
"Your death is the gift sought by Khain's pretty brides."

Please bear in mind that our answers are not official, and only reflect
years of practical experience and feedback.
Customer Service/Roolzboyz: 800-492-8820
USA Mail Order: 800-394-GAME
UK Mail Order: 011-441-1591-40000
Canadian Mail Order: 888-GW-TROLL


-----Original Message-----
From: mgrosh@mindspring.com [mailto:mgrosh@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:29 PM
To: ab@support.wolflair.com
Subject: Tryanid mutable warriors question


When creating a brood of 3 warriors using the mutable genes from the back of
the codex, I create a brood with 5 pairs of scything talons and one heavy
weapon (barbed strangler or venom cannon).

Is this brood
A: elite (page 39)
B: Is this brood Heavy Support or HQ (page 38)


Just to make sure my question is answered fully:

When creating a brood of 3 warriors using the mutable genes from the back of
the codex, I create a brood with 4 pairs of scything talons and two heavy
weapons (barbed strangler or venom cannon).

Is this brood
A: elite (page 39)
B: Is this brood Heavy Support or HQ (page 38)


Thanks
Michael
 
One fine day in the middle of the night, mgrosh@mindspring.com got up to
write:

>Hey everyone. I got a response from the rulez boyz. I think that the faq
>question that origionally made the makers of the AB data files decide to not
>have a unit of warriors with only one heavy weapon count as heavy support
>instead of elite was poorly written and although wrong was not wrong in a
>way as to affect a unit from being elite with just one heavy weapon. he is
>my origional letter and response from the rulez boyz.

"Rulings" from the Roolzboyz are generally about as useful as a
chocolate fireguard. However, based on the sweeping tides of public
opinion...

>colen.. Can this be fixed for the next release of the data files?

Well... I suppose so :P

(I think I just have to uncomment two lines of code somewhere :)

--
'Not Colin' McAlister | License to Skrill
Email: demandred@skrill.org | Visit http://www.skrill.org/ today!
-----------------------------+------------------------------------
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain" - Robert Jordan's Wheel Of Time
 
--- In armybuilder@y..., Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@s...>
wrote:

> "Rulings" from the Roolzboyz are generally about as useful as a
> chocolate fireguard. However, based on the sweeping tides of public
> opinion...
>

No joke. I got 2 different answers to the same question from the SAME
Droolboy, in the same day!
 
Back
Top