• Please note: In an effort to ensure that all of our users feel welcome on our forums, we’ve updated our forum rules. You can review the updated rules here: http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=5528.

    If a fellow Community member is not following the forum rules, please report the post by clicking the Report button (the red yield sign on the left) located on every post. This will notify the moderators directly. If you have any questions about these new rules, please contact support@wolflair.com.

    - The Lone Wolf Development Team

Pathfinder: Black Powder Inquisition

Hello!

When I selected the Black Powder Inquisition it added Gunsmithing as a bonus feat and added the Musket as a usable weapon. It did not add Exotic Weapon Proficiency (firearms) and none of the guns other than the Musket are listed as a proficient weapon.

For "Firearm Availability" I have it set to commonplace guns. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Commonplace Guns: While still expensive and tricky to wield, early firearms are readily available. Instead of requiring the Exotic Weapon Proficiency feat, all firearms are martial weapons. Early firearms and their ammunition cost 25% of the amounts listed in this book, but advanced firearms and their ammunition are still rare and cost the full price to purchase or craft.


When set to Commonplace guns you no longer need the Exotic Weapon Proficiency as they are now martial weapons.

As for being proficient yea that sort of looks like it maybe a bug. I would recommend sending in a bug report.
 
My only thought about this is that I assume your character is a inquisitor right? So inquisitors don't get Martial Weapon Proficiency. So if all guns are now martial you would still not be proficient in them.

That is a strange loop hole where guns are more common their for your character is not proficient with them. :p
 
There was a similar bug with an archtype for wizards that normally granted proficiency in guns losing that when they became martial weapons due to commonplace guns, and we erred on the side of granting proficiency. I suspect we'll do the same in this case as well.
 
Back
Top