A
armybuilder at yahoogroup
Guest
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 12 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
2. Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
From: "cyberdragon23313" <cyberdragon23313@yahoo.com>
3. Re: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
From: "ghazhkull_thraka" <Ghazhkull_Thraka@dakkadakka.com>
4. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Webmaster <webmaster@blee.biz>
5. Re: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
From: Colen McAlister <colen@wolflair.com>
6. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
7. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Steven Crane <plansofmice@uk2.net>
8. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
9. Question
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
10. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
11. Re: Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Colen McAlister <colen@wolflair.com>
12. Re: Question
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:46:20 +0100
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
> That is a very reasonable tactic. They already do that with their
> miniatures,
GW events expect GW models to be used - if you turn up with a Rackham army
then expect it to be refused entry.
> What would GW do about things like Warhammer? Currently, there is no
> official equivalent for Warhammer.
If the 40k IAL works and sells well, then I can see a Warhammer version.
> What about armies that are not (yet) officially supported by IAL, but are
> real 40K armies?
That puts us in the same boat as we have now with 40k armies not appearing
in the 40k datafiles - its a wait and see scenario.
> What about bugs in IAL?
Yeah!! Damn those Tyranids!!
Seriously, I'd expect the same type of customer support that other software
gets - you find a bug and send details to the software company and then wait
for a fix.
> If the printout says that an army costs 1400
> points, but you 'know' it costs 1500 after doing the same army by hand,
> which is right, and which gets into a tournament?
If it can be proven that the electronic version is screwed then thats a bug
and thus you report it. As to which one gets into a tournie, well that
depends on any checking method employed by the tournie organizers.
Jimi
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:00:13 -0000
From: "cyberdragon23313" <cyberdragon23313@yahoo.com>
Subject: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
I went up to my local GW and they were trying to get people into this
new card game called warcry. I tried to sit down to figure it out and
got a free pack of starter cards to test it out. the games is kinda
fun and it has MTG and other CCG styles but with a warhammer theme.
just wondering if anyone is gonna do a dat file on it.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:08:55 -0000
From: "ghazhkull_thraka" <Ghazhkull_Thraka@dakkadakka.com>
Subject: Re: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
Wrong list. As a CARD game, Warcry would be supported by Card Vault
and NOT Army Builder. Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cardvault/
instead.
--- In armybuilder@yahoogroups.com, "cyberdragon23313"
<cyberdragon23313@y...> wrote:
> I went up to my local GW and they were trying to get people into
this
> new card game called warcry. I tried to sit down to figure it out
and
> got a free pack of starter cards to test it out. the games is
kinda
> fun and it has MTG and other CCG styles but with a warhammer
theme.
> just wondering if anyone is gonna do a dat file on it.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:50:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Webmaster <webmaster@blee.biz>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
Yes,
I don't believe the situation is as dire as some
people may think. LoneWolf makes a product that
depends on datafiles to work. Not only datafiles for
GW games, but datafiles for a wide variety of games.
As has been said, LW doesn't make the
datafiles...users of AB do. I can see GW going a step
further than what Gene has said. GW could force LW to
remove the search for recent updated datafiles (or at
least modify it so that no datafiles for GW games
would appear). As Gene has said, it would be
difficult for GW to enforce people not making
datafiles for GW games. Not that GW would have done
this, but I think they'd have been better officially
licensing LW to handle GW datafiles and such.
--- Gene <gcc@siegetower.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since GW doesn't have anything like an OGL they
> can just
> > order LoneWolf to stop supporting their products.
> Anyone
> > who's been gaming for long enough knows that GW
> would
> > do exactly that to anything that dares compete
> with their
> > own products.
> >
> ===================
> this will probably be almost impossible to enforce,
> seeing that the
> Datafiles are not written by Lone Wolf, but by users
> not affiliated with
> Lone Wolf. All LW COULD be made to do is ask end
> users not to use/write
> datafiles for GW games, which in turn LW could not
> enforce. IF GW could
> enforce this, they would have years ago.
>
> Gene
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, email
>
> armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:52:03 -0800
From: Colen McAlister <colen@wolflair.com>
Subject: Re: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
At 04:00 PM 4/1/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>I went up to my local GW and they were trying to get people into this
>new card game called warcry. I tried to sit down to figure it out and
>got a free pack of starter cards to test it out. the games is kinda
>fun and it has MTG and other CCG styles but with a warhammer theme.
>just wondering if anyone is gonna do a dat file on it.
As another poster has mentioned, collectible card and miniatures games are
better supported by Card Vault, also produced by Lone Wolf Development. For
more details, go here:
http://www.wolflair.com/card_vault/
It's worth noting that there is already one GW-related CCG that Card Vault
supports, based on Warhammer 40,000. When War Cry is released, I'm sure
that Card Vault datafiles for it will be available soon after.
--
Colen McAlister (colen@wolflair.com)
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:55:04 -0600
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
Have you ever heard of an open source program called DeCSS? People
thought the same thing about that, and then the movie industry dragged
a 16 year old kid through court to prove them wrong. Now thanks to the
US government it is ILLEAGAL to play DVDs on your Linux box.
If you were distributing the datafiles on your website and a lawyer
from GW called and demanded that you desist would you risk your financial
well being on principle?
Making Lone Wolf remove the datafiles from the autoupdate would be as
trivial as having their lawyer send him a letter.
GW has forced quite a few sites that are critical of them to disist using
their graphics on their websites (Cult of the Rogue Trader most
prominantly)
long after those sites went up. If you're the owner of an IP then you can,
are obligated to actually, force others to stop using it.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:04:56 -0800, Gene <gcc@siegetower.com> wrote:
>>
>> Since GW doesn't have anything like an OGL they can just
>> order LoneWolf to stop supporting their products. Anyone
>> who's been gaming for long enough knows that GW would
>> do exactly that to anything that dares compete with their
>> own products.
>>
> ===================
> this will probably be almost impossible to enforce, seeing that the
> Datafiles are not written by Lone Wolf, but by users not affiliated with
> Lone Wolf. All LW COULD be made to do is ask end users not to use/write
> datafiles for GW games, which in turn LW could not enforce. IF GW could
> enforce this, they would have years ago.
>
> Gene
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, email
>
> armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
--
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:44:01 +0100
From: Steven Crane <plansofmice@uk2.net>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
...What Games Workshop will probably do will be more subversive. Like not
allow army lists printed with Army Builder to be used in official
tournaments...
This is the strategy that I would expect. The existing Interative Army List
(IAL) already has a pre-defined tournament roster output and carries a note
that your roster MUST be submitted in this format.
Personally, I happen to prefer IAL for 40k. It has a couple of irritating
features (it talks on the default setting) but produces a very nice print
out FOR ONE GAME but then I dare say Army Builder would be a bit prettier
if it only had one system to accommodate.
They might waste time in chasing down the on-line data-files but I don't
think they'll have much success although they could conceivable insist that
a few of the bigger more conspicuous hosts drop them. On the whole, I don't
think it would do them much good to take on Army Builder as for the
foreseeable future it will carry support far more of their game systems
than they do.
If you are primarily interested in GW then you're probably going to stumble
across and purchase their programme a long time before you discover Army
Builder anyway. If GW doesn't dominate your game time then Army Builder
will remain as useful as it always has been.
---Steven
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:54:07 -0600
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:46:20 +0100, Jimi <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
wrote:
>> That is a very reasonable tactic. They already do that with their
>> miniatures,
>
> GW events expect GW models to be used - if you turn up with a Rackham
> army
> then expect it to be refused entry.
But it would be so funny to see the looks on the organizers faces. I've
often thought of scaring up models from a bygone age like the "beaky"
space marines for a GT. Just to see their forehead veins bulge.
"Look, these are GW models!"
>
>> What would GW do about things like Warhammer? Currently, there is no
>> official equivalent for Warhammer.
>
> If the 40k IAL works and sells well, then I can see a Warhammer version.
And a version for all their other games too. Probably a version that you'd
have to buy separately for each one.
>
>> What about armies that are not (yet) officially supported by IAL, but
>> are
>> real 40K armies?
>
> That puts us in the same boat as we have now with 40k armies not
> appearing
> in the 40k datafiles - its a wait and see scenario.
Indeed, but given GW's history I'd put money on GW jerking Lone Wolf
around. Good riddance, the more people they alienate and drive away
from their crap games the better.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:12:47 -0600
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
Subject: Question
Do I know you?
I used to know a John who played Warhammer and various other Miniature
games at Starbase Alpha was it? Up in the Fox Valley?
--
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:07:36 +0100
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
> But it would be so funny to see the looks on the organizers faces. I've
> often thought of scaring up models from a bygone age like the "beaky"
> space marines for a GT. Just to see their forehead veins bulge.
Beaky marines were made by GW, so no problem there (unless said organizers
are so anal as to ban non-current models)
> And a version for all their other games too. Probably a version that you'd
> have to buy separately for each one.
If its GW then you'll have to buy everything - GW dont do 'free'
Jimi
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:11:05 -0800
From: Colen McAlister <colen@wolflair.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Future of Army Builder?
At 10:44 PM 4/1/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>...What Games Workshop will probably do will be more subversive. Like not
>allow army lists printed with Army Builder to be used in official
>tournaments...
>
>This is the strategy that I would expect. The existing Interative Army List
>(IAL) already has a pre-defined tournament roster output and carries a note
>that your roster MUST be submitted in this format.
>
>Personally, I happen to prefer IAL for 40k. It has a couple of irritating
>features (it talks on the default setting) but produces a very nice print
>out FOR ONE GAME but then I dare say Army Builder would be a bit prettier
>if it only had one system to accommodate.
Using the 'custom output extensions' mechanism within Army Builder, you can
do this - if you take a look at the CAV datafiles, they have a quite pretty
'datacard printer' included. Using the ABPrint source code included with
the construction kit (I think), it should be quite feasible for someone
familiar with C++ to create an extension that outputs in 'GW tournament
format'. (You could really write it in any language you liked, as long as
you knew how to write code to print documents in it.)
--
Colen McAlister (colen@wolflair.com)
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:21:52 -0600
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Question
Please disregard this, or delete these two messages if you're a mod.
Appearantly I'm a moron.
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:12:47 -0600, Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Do I know you?
>
> I used to know a John who played Warhammer and various other Miniature
> games at Starbase Alpha was it? Up in the Fox Valley?
>
--
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 12 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
2. Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
From: "cyberdragon23313" <cyberdragon23313@yahoo.com>
3. Re: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
From: "ghazhkull_thraka" <Ghazhkull_Thraka@dakkadakka.com>
4. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Webmaster <webmaster@blee.biz>
5. Re: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
From: Colen McAlister <colen@wolflair.com>
6. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
7. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Steven Crane <plansofmice@uk2.net>
8. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
9. Question
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
10. Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
11. Re: Re: Future of Army Builder?
From: Colen McAlister <colen@wolflair.com>
12. Re: Question
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:46:20 +0100
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
> That is a very reasonable tactic. They already do that with their
> miniatures,
GW events expect GW models to be used - if you turn up with a Rackham army
then expect it to be refused entry.
> What would GW do about things like Warhammer? Currently, there is no
> official equivalent for Warhammer.
If the 40k IAL works and sells well, then I can see a Warhammer version.
> What about armies that are not (yet) officially supported by IAL, but are
> real 40K armies?
That puts us in the same boat as we have now with 40k armies not appearing
in the 40k datafiles - its a wait and see scenario.
> What about bugs in IAL?
Yeah!! Damn those Tyranids!!
Seriously, I'd expect the same type of customer support that other software
gets - you find a bug and send details to the software company and then wait
for a fix.
> If the printout says that an army costs 1400
> points, but you 'know' it costs 1500 after doing the same army by hand,
> which is right, and which gets into a tournament?
If it can be proven that the electronic version is screwed then thats a bug
and thus you report it. As to which one gets into a tournie, well that
depends on any checking method employed by the tournie organizers.
Jimi
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:00:13 -0000
From: "cyberdragon23313" <cyberdragon23313@yahoo.com>
Subject: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
I went up to my local GW and they were trying to get people into this
new card game called warcry. I tried to sit down to figure it out and
got a free pack of starter cards to test it out. the games is kinda
fun and it has MTG and other CCG styles but with a warhammer theme.
just wondering if anyone is gonna do a dat file on it.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:08:55 -0000
From: "ghazhkull_thraka" <Ghazhkull_Thraka@dakkadakka.com>
Subject: Re: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
Wrong list. As a CARD game, Warcry would be supported by Card Vault
and NOT Army Builder. Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cardvault/
instead.
--- In armybuilder@yahoogroups.com, "cyberdragon23313"
<cyberdragon23313@y...> wrote:
> I went up to my local GW and they were trying to get people into
this
> new card game called warcry. I tried to sit down to figure it out
and
> got a free pack of starter cards to test it out. the games is
kinda
> fun and it has MTG and other CCG styles but with a warhammer
theme.
> just wondering if anyone is gonna do a dat file on it.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:50:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Webmaster <webmaster@blee.biz>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
Yes,
I don't believe the situation is as dire as some
people may think. LoneWolf makes a product that
depends on datafiles to work. Not only datafiles for
GW games, but datafiles for a wide variety of games.
As has been said, LW doesn't make the
datafiles...users of AB do. I can see GW going a step
further than what Gene has said. GW could force LW to
remove the search for recent updated datafiles (or at
least modify it so that no datafiles for GW games
would appear). As Gene has said, it would be
difficult for GW to enforce people not making
datafiles for GW games. Not that GW would have done
this, but I think they'd have been better officially
licensing LW to handle GW datafiles and such.
--- Gene <gcc@siegetower.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since GW doesn't have anything like an OGL they
> can just
> > order LoneWolf to stop supporting their products.
> Anyone
> > who's been gaming for long enough knows that GW
> would
> > do exactly that to anything that dares compete
> with their
> > own products.
> >
> ===================
> this will probably be almost impossible to enforce,
> seeing that the
> Datafiles are not written by Lone Wolf, but by users
> not affiliated with
> Lone Wolf. All LW COULD be made to do is ask end
> users not to use/write
> datafiles for GW games, which in turn LW could not
> enforce. IF GW could
> enforce this, they would have years ago.
>
> Gene
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, email
>
> armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:52:03 -0800
From: Colen McAlister <colen@wolflair.com>
Subject: Re: Any addtion of the new Warcry card game for AB?
At 04:00 PM 4/1/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>I went up to my local GW and they were trying to get people into this
>new card game called warcry. I tried to sit down to figure it out and
>got a free pack of starter cards to test it out. the games is kinda
>fun and it has MTG and other CCG styles but with a warhammer theme.
>just wondering if anyone is gonna do a dat file on it.
As another poster has mentioned, collectible card and miniatures games are
better supported by Card Vault, also produced by Lone Wolf Development. For
more details, go here:
http://www.wolflair.com/card_vault/
It's worth noting that there is already one GW-related CCG that Card Vault
supports, based on Warhammer 40,000. When War Cry is released, I'm sure
that Card Vault datafiles for it will be available soon after.
--
Colen McAlister (colen@wolflair.com)
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:55:04 -0600
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
Have you ever heard of an open source program called DeCSS? People
thought the same thing about that, and then the movie industry dragged
a 16 year old kid through court to prove them wrong. Now thanks to the
US government it is ILLEAGAL to play DVDs on your Linux box.
If you were distributing the datafiles on your website and a lawyer
from GW called and demanded that you desist would you risk your financial
well being on principle?
Making Lone Wolf remove the datafiles from the autoupdate would be as
trivial as having their lawyer send him a letter.
GW has forced quite a few sites that are critical of them to disist using
their graphics on their websites (Cult of the Rogue Trader most
prominantly)
long after those sites went up. If you're the owner of an IP then you can,
are obligated to actually, force others to stop using it.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:04:56 -0800, Gene <gcc@siegetower.com> wrote:
>>
>> Since GW doesn't have anything like an OGL they can just
>> order LoneWolf to stop supporting their products. Anyone
>> who's been gaming for long enough knows that GW would
>> do exactly that to anything that dares compete with their
>> own products.
>>
> ===================
> this will probably be almost impossible to enforce, seeing that the
> Datafiles are not written by Lone Wolf, but by users not affiliated with
> Lone Wolf. All LW COULD be made to do is ask end users not to use/write
> datafiles for GW games, which in turn LW could not enforce. IF GW could
> enforce this, they would have years ago.
>
> Gene
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, email
>
> armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
--
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:44:01 +0100
From: Steven Crane <plansofmice@uk2.net>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
...What Games Workshop will probably do will be more subversive. Like not
allow army lists printed with Army Builder to be used in official
tournaments...
This is the strategy that I would expect. The existing Interative Army List
(IAL) already has a pre-defined tournament roster output and carries a note
that your roster MUST be submitted in this format.
Personally, I happen to prefer IAL for 40k. It has a couple of irritating
features (it talks on the default setting) but produces a very nice print
out FOR ONE GAME but then I dare say Army Builder would be a bit prettier
if it only had one system to accommodate.
They might waste time in chasing down the on-line data-files but I don't
think they'll have much success although they could conceivable insist that
a few of the bigger more conspicuous hosts drop them. On the whole, I don't
think it would do them much good to take on Army Builder as for the
foreseeable future it will carry support far more of their game systems
than they do.
If you are primarily interested in GW then you're probably going to stumble
across and purchase their programme a long time before you discover Army
Builder anyway. If GW doesn't dominate your game time then Army Builder
will remain as useful as it always has been.
---Steven
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:54:07 -0600
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:46:20 +0100, Jimi <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
wrote:
>> That is a very reasonable tactic. They already do that with their
>> miniatures,
>
> GW events expect GW models to be used - if you turn up with a Rackham
> army
> then expect it to be refused entry.
But it would be so funny to see the looks on the organizers faces. I've
often thought of scaring up models from a bygone age like the "beaky"
space marines for a GT. Just to see their forehead veins bulge.
"Look, these are GW models!"
>
>> What would GW do about things like Warhammer? Currently, there is no
>> official equivalent for Warhammer.
>
> If the 40k IAL works and sells well, then I can see a Warhammer version.
And a version for all their other games too. Probably a version that you'd
have to buy separately for each one.
>
>> What about armies that are not (yet) officially supported by IAL, but
>> are
>> real 40K armies?
>
> That puts us in the same boat as we have now with 40k armies not
> appearing
> in the 40k datafiles - its a wait and see scenario.
Indeed, but given GW's history I'd put money on GW jerking Lone Wolf
around. Good riddance, the more people they alienate and drive away
from their crap games the better.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:12:47 -0600
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
Subject: Question
Do I know you?
I used to know a John who played Warhammer and various other Miniature
games at Starbase Alpha was it? Up in the Fox Valley?
--
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:07:36 +0100
From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Future of Army Builder?
> But it would be so funny to see the looks on the organizers faces. I've
> often thought of scaring up models from a bygone age like the "beaky"
> space marines for a GT. Just to see their forehead veins bulge.
Beaky marines were made by GW, so no problem there (unless said organizers
are so anal as to ban non-current models)
> And a version for all their other games too. Probably a version that you'd
> have to buy separately for each one.
If its GW then you'll have to buy everything - GW dont do 'free'
Jimi
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:11:05 -0800
From: Colen McAlister <colen@wolflair.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Future of Army Builder?
At 10:44 PM 4/1/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>...What Games Workshop will probably do will be more subversive. Like not
>allow army lists printed with Army Builder to be used in official
>tournaments...
>
>This is the strategy that I would expect. The existing Interative Army List
>(IAL) already has a pre-defined tournament roster output and carries a note
>that your roster MUST be submitted in this format.
>
>Personally, I happen to prefer IAL for 40k. It has a couple of irritating
>features (it talks on the default setting) but produces a very nice print
>out FOR ONE GAME but then I dare say Army Builder would be a bit prettier
>if it only had one system to accommodate.
Using the 'custom output extensions' mechanism within Army Builder, you can
do this - if you take a look at the CAV datafiles, they have a quite pretty
'datacard printer' included. Using the ABPrint source code included with
the construction kit (I think), it should be quite feasible for someone
familiar with C++ to create an extension that outputs in 'GW tournament
format'. (You could really write it in any language you liked, as long as
you knew how to write code to print documents in it.)
--
Colen McAlister (colen@wolflair.com)
Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:21:52 -0600
From: Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Question
Please disregard this, or delete these two messages if you're a mod.
Appearantly I'm a moron.
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:12:47 -0600, Glen <ringsnake@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Do I know you?
>
> I used to know a John who played Warhammer and various other Miniature
> games at Starbase Alpha was it? Up in the Fox Valley?
>
--
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/