A
armybuilder at yahoogroup
Guest
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Pv4pGD/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 2 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Re: The "vwst" option attribute
From: "Russell Sparkes" <rjs@inorbit.com>
2. lead, foll and ratio between them
From: "Shawn Campbell" <shawn@electricstitch.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 23:04:53 -0000
From: "Russell Sparkes" <rjs@inorbit.com>
Subject: Re: The "vwst" option attribute
--- In armybuilder@y..., scbd@b... wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble with the vwst attribute on an option.
[snip]
> The descriptive text indicates that the stat displayed is always
> the fully adjusted value, so does this only apply to other stat
> adjusting
> options which are linked to the unit, or should it also cover the
> accumulated stats on leaders and I'm doing something wrong ?
>From the descrption of the -accum switch to the lead: attribute :-
"Warning: Use of the "-accum" qualifier will cause any adjustments to
the calculated stat to be ignored. The accumulated stat value is
calculated after all other roster updates are processed, and the new
value simply overwrites any value that was calculated normally for
the leader unit. If automatic roster validation is disabled, then the
accumulated stat value will not be updated until the next validation
is triggered, as the accumulation is performed as part of the roster
validation processing. For this same reason, it is not possible to
use an accumulated stat value within a derived stat, as the
accumulated value does not exist when the derived stat is calculated."
So, the problem you are having is with lead-accum, not with vwst
I know that doesn't solve your problem, but it does explain what is
happening and why it doesn't work. In the past lead-accum has only
been used for triggering validation errors, thus the reason for it to
be carried out as part of validation...
Cheers,
Russell.
----
Russell Sparkes - rjs@inorbit.com - http://www.freecfm.com/r/rjs
"Experience is what you get just after you needed it" - Unknown
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 16:29:56 -0700
From: "Shawn Campbell" <shawn@electricstitch.com>
Subject: lead, foll and ratio between them
I have a unit that is a leader
I have 2 different units that are followers.
The combined number of models from the followers must be <= the number of
models in the leader unit.
I've tried a couple of approaches, but keep running into dead ends. Help!
I am so close to finishing these files...
Thanks,
Shawn
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Pv4pGD/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 2 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Re: The "vwst" option attribute
From: "Russell Sparkes" <rjs@inorbit.com>
2. lead, foll and ratio between them
From: "Shawn Campbell" <shawn@electricstitch.com>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 23:04:53 -0000
From: "Russell Sparkes" <rjs@inorbit.com>
Subject: Re: The "vwst" option attribute
--- In armybuilder@y..., scbd@b... wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble with the vwst attribute on an option.
[snip]
> The descriptive text indicates that the stat displayed is always
> the fully adjusted value, so does this only apply to other stat
> adjusting
> options which are linked to the unit, or should it also cover the
> accumulated stats on leaders and I'm doing something wrong ?
>From the descrption of the -accum switch to the lead: attribute :-
"Warning: Use of the "-accum" qualifier will cause any adjustments to
the calculated stat to be ignored. The accumulated stat value is
calculated after all other roster updates are processed, and the new
value simply overwrites any value that was calculated normally for
the leader unit. If automatic roster validation is disabled, then the
accumulated stat value will not be updated until the next validation
is triggered, as the accumulation is performed as part of the roster
validation processing. For this same reason, it is not possible to
use an accumulated stat value within a derived stat, as the
accumulated value does not exist when the derived stat is calculated."
So, the problem you are having is with lead-accum, not with vwst
I know that doesn't solve your problem, but it does explain what is
happening and why it doesn't work. In the past lead-accum has only
been used for triggering validation errors, thus the reason for it to
be carried out as part of validation...
Cheers,
Russell.
----
Russell Sparkes - rjs@inorbit.com - http://www.freecfm.com/r/rjs
"Experience is what you get just after you needed it" - Unknown
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 16:29:56 -0700
From: "Shawn Campbell" <shawn@electricstitch.com>
Subject: lead, foll and ratio between them
I have a unit that is a leader
I have 2 different units that are followers.
The combined number of models from the followers must be <= the number of
models in the leader unit.
I've tried a couple of approaches, but keep running into dead ends. Help!
I am so close to finishing these files...
Thanks,
Shawn
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/