A
armybuilder at egroups.co
Guest
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 7 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. RE: Digest Number 262
From: Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@skrill.org>
2. Re: Digest Number 262
From: Mathias Gehl <mgehl@home.com>
3. RE: Digest Number 262
From: Kevin Fuhrman <mop@cybergap.net>
4. unsubscribe
From: charles lowe <charmern@yahoo.com>
5. Re: Digest Number 262
From: Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@skrill.org>
6. RE: Digest Number 263
From: "Rothman, Daniel (IGNITE)" <drothman.dmth94@gtalumni.org>
7. Re: Edmonton, Canada [OT]
From: ice_age@hotmail.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 10:50:10 +0000
From: Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@skrill.org>
Subject: RE: Digest Number 262
At 19:59 03/01/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Colin -
> >
> >unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit into one force
> >organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states). it's not a big
> >deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
> >composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier to implement in
> >AB.
>
>Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the requirements on
>its own.
Yep. Unfortunately, I can't see any way of enforcing both of those rules -
you can have one or t' other
--
'Not Colin' McAlister - License to Skrill
Email: demandred@skrill.org | Visit http://www.skrill.org/ today!
-----------------------------+------------------------------------
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain" - Robert Jordan's Wheel Of Time
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 04:56:06 -0800
From: Mathias Gehl <mgehl@home.com>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 262
Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister wrote:
> At 19:59 03/01/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>> Colin -
>>>
>>> unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit into one force
>>> organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states). it's not a big
>>> deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
>>> composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier to implement in
>>> AB.
>>
>> Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the requirements on
>> its own.
>
>
> Yep. Unfortunately, I can't see any way of enforcing both of those rules -
> you can have one or t' other
Just a thought, another 5 composition groups for the reserves? There's
some racial attribute which allows you to add composition groups. Then
add a validation that checks the total points in various composition
groups against the allowed total.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 10:26:50 -0500
From: Kevin Fuhrman <mop@cybergap.net>
Subject: RE: Digest Number 262
At 07:59 PM 1/3/01 -0500, you wrote:
>At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Colin -
> >
> >unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit into one force
> >organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states). it's not a big
> >deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
> >composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier to implement in
> >AB.
>
>Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the requirements on
>its own.
>
>Phil G.
The 1200 point force doesn't need to meet all requirements, but
that plus either of the 500 point attachments must be a legal army.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:39:17 -0800 (PST)
From: charles lowe <charmern@yahoo.com>
Subject: unsubscribe
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 15:16:52 +0000
From: Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@skrill.org>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 262
At 04:56 04/01/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister wrote:
>
> > At 19:59 03/01/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >> At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >>
> >>> Colin -
> >>>
> >>> unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit into one
> force
> >>> organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states). it's not a big
> >>> deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
> >>> composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier to
> implement in
> >>> AB.
> >>
> >> Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the
> requirements on
> >> its own.
> >
> >
> > Yep. Unfortunately, I can't see any way of enforcing both of those rules -
> > you can have one or t' other
>
>Just a thought, another 5 composition groups for the reserves? There's
>some racial attribute which allows you to add composition groups. Then
>add a validation that checks the total points in various composition
>groups against the allowed total.
Unfortunately AB only supports 8 composition groups being used at once.
That would make 10. Also, I don't *think* (though I could be wrong) that
you can say "Trp1+Trp2+Trp3 must be >= 2 and <= 6". Thirdly, there's no way
to say "Apply this option only if the unit is of composition group X".
Minor flaws
--
'Not Colin' McAlister - License to Skrill
Email: demandred@skrill.org | Visit http://www.skrill.org/ today!
-----------------------------+------------------------------------
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain" - Robert Jordan's Wheel Of Time
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:24:35 -0500
From: "Rothman, Daniel (IGNITE)" <drothman.dmth94@gtalumni.org>
Subject: RE: Digest Number 263
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 19:59:21 -0500
> From: Phil Groff <pgroff@home.com>
> Subject: RE: Digest Number 262
>
> At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Colin -
> >
> >unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit
> into one force
> >organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states).
> it's not a big
> >deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
> >composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier
> to implement in
> >AB.
>
> Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the
> requirements on
> its own.
>
> Phil G.
>
>
I just got e-mail confirmation on the 1200 pts. It must be it's own,
independent, legal army <sigh>. Means I can't split my two HQs across the
reserve chunks...
daniel
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 08:04:58 -0000
From: ice_age@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Edmonton, Canada [OT]
--- In armybuilder@egroups.com, David William Shead <sheady@x> wrote:
> It seems very likely that a friend of mine will be moving in the
next
> couple of months with his wife and family to Edminton in Canada to
live.
> Does anyone have gaming contacts in that neck of the woods?
>
> Regards
> David Shead
> Dunedin
> New Zealand
I live in Edmonton (yep, it's with an 'o', and it has a healthy
gaming community, including two Games Workshop stores. What sort of
info are you looking for, besides the fact it's cold (which is a
given)?
Keith Hann
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
armybuilder-unsubscribe@egroups.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 7 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. RE: Digest Number 262
From: Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@skrill.org>
2. Re: Digest Number 262
From: Mathias Gehl <mgehl@home.com>
3. RE: Digest Number 262
From: Kevin Fuhrman <mop@cybergap.net>
4. unsubscribe
From: charles lowe <charmern@yahoo.com>
5. Re: Digest Number 262
From: Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@skrill.org>
6. RE: Digest Number 263
From: "Rothman, Daniel (IGNITE)" <drothman.dmth94@gtalumni.org>
7. Re: Edmonton, Canada [OT]
From: ice_age@hotmail.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 10:50:10 +0000
From: Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@skrill.org>
Subject: RE: Digest Number 262
At 19:59 03/01/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Colin -
> >
> >unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit into one force
> >organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states). it's not a big
> >deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
> >composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier to implement in
> >AB.
>
>Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the requirements on
>its own.
Yep. Unfortunately, I can't see any way of enforcing both of those rules -
you can have one or t' other
--
'Not Colin' McAlister - License to Skrill
Email: demandred@skrill.org | Visit http://www.skrill.org/ today!
-----------------------------+------------------------------------
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain" - Robert Jordan's Wheel Of Time
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 04:56:06 -0800
From: Mathias Gehl <mgehl@home.com>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 262
Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister wrote:
> At 19:59 03/01/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>> Colin -
>>>
>>> unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit into one force
>>> organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states). it's not a big
>>> deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
>>> composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier to implement in
>>> AB.
>>
>> Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the requirements on
>> its own.
>
>
> Yep. Unfortunately, I can't see any way of enforcing both of those rules -
> you can have one or t' other
Just a thought, another 5 composition groups for the reserves? There's
some racial attribute which allows you to add composition groups. Then
add a validation that checks the total points in various composition
groups against the allowed total.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 10:26:50 -0500
From: Kevin Fuhrman <mop@cybergap.net>
Subject: RE: Digest Number 262
At 07:59 PM 1/3/01 -0500, you wrote:
>At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Colin -
> >
> >unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit into one force
> >organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states). it's not a big
> >deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
> >composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier to implement in
> >AB.
>
>Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the requirements on
>its own.
>
>Phil G.
The 1200 point force doesn't need to meet all requirements, but
that plus either of the 500 point attachments must be a legal army.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:39:17 -0800 (PST)
From: charles lowe <charmern@yahoo.com>
Subject: unsubscribe
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
[This message contained attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 15:16:52 +0000
From: Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister <demandred@skrill.org>
Subject: Re: Digest Number 262
At 04:56 04/01/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Colen 'Skrillboy' McAlister wrote:
>
> > At 19:59 03/01/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >> At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >>
> >>> Colin -
> >>>
> >>> unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit into one
> force
> >>> organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states). it's not a big
> >>> deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
> >>> composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier to
> implement in
> >>> AB.
> >>
> >> Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the
> requirements on
> >> its own.
> >
> >
> > Yep. Unfortunately, I can't see any way of enforcing both of those rules -
> > you can have one or t' other
>
>Just a thought, another 5 composition groups for the reserves? There's
>some racial attribute which allows you to add composition groups. Then
>add a validation that checks the total points in various composition
>groups against the allowed total.
Unfortunately AB only supports 8 composition groups being used at once.
That would make 10. Also, I don't *think* (though I could be wrong) that
you can say "Trp1+Trp2+Trp3 must be >= 2 and <= 6". Thirdly, there's no way
to say "Apply this option only if the unit is of composition group X".
Minor flaws
--
'Not Colin' McAlister - License to Skrill
Email: demandred@skrill.org | Visit http://www.skrill.org/ today!
-----------------------------+------------------------------------
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain" - Robert Jordan's Wheel Of Time
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:24:35 -0500
From: "Rothman, Daniel (IGNITE)" <drothman.dmth94@gtalumni.org>
Subject: RE: Digest Number 263
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 19:59:21 -0500
> From: Phil Groff <pgroff@home.com>
> Subject: RE: Digest Number 262
>
> At 05:36 PM 03/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Colin -
> >
> >unfortunately not the case... the full 1200+500+500 must fit
> into one force
> >organization chart (per Jason Buyaki here in the states).
> it's not a big
> >deal (largely because of the greatly revised, expanded, and annoying
> >composition scoring rules...) but probably makes it easier
> to implement in
> >AB.
>
> Not only that, but I believe the base 1200pts must meet the
> requirements on
> its own.
>
> Phil G.
>
>
I just got e-mail confirmation on the 1200 pts. It must be it's own,
independent, legal army <sigh>. Means I can't split my two HQs across the
reserve chunks...
daniel
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 08:04:58 -0000
From: ice_age@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Edmonton, Canada [OT]
--- In armybuilder@egroups.com, David William Shead <sheady@x> wrote:
> It seems very likely that a friend of mine will be moving in the
next
> couple of months with his wife and family to Edminton in Canada to
live.
> Does anyone have gaming contacts in that neck of the woods?
>
> Regards
> David Shead
> Dunedin
> New Zealand
I live in Edmonton (yep, it's with an 'o'
, and it has a healthy gaming community, including two Games Workshop stores. What sort of
info are you looking for, besides the fact it's cold (which is a
given)?
Keith Hann
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________