Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 216
|
But that's not the point. If the application were not tied to a server, there would NOT be a problem. Shrugging it off? Seriously? I pay for service and expect it to be there when I need it. It's not like they didn't know that this would be a big weekend. They appear to be paying more attention to the Playtest rather than supporting the already paid customers who want to use it for actual playing with a game that's already been around for a year. Not being able to support that is not shrug offable. Shrugging it off means just wiping out what I paid and going by hand. If I wanted that, I wouldn't have paid in the first place. But if we're still going to be in beta mode, then they shouldn't be charging yet. (hey, they aren't charging for playtest, but we've got a less than 50% version of Starfinder that some of us paid for). Actually, if you read my post, you'd have seen that I had printed off a copy.
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,092
|
Quote:
Current RPG's: Pathfinder (GM), Pathfinder (Player), Gamma World (GM, Pathfinder homebrew). HeroLab: 3.5 & Pathfinder. HL User Files for PF: Greyhawk Setting, Gamma World (WIP). DM and player of D&D since 1980. |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 216
|
But I DID pay. Had to buy base system. And if the server is not available, it's worthless. I'm not talking about the unfinished parts. I'm talking about availability during one of the two major cons of the year.
|
#13 |
|
|