Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,528
|
Quote:
Currently, reveal is for all players equally. It *is* snippet-by-snippet, but what is revealed is revealed to all players. Per-character (as in even more specific than per-Player) control is in the works, but is not available at this time. |
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
The 'requirement' of RW is due to one of the core purposes of RW being for dessemination of information between GM and players. |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 416
|
How does that 'requirement' translate to a 'requirement' that it be internet connected and transferred to a 3rd party server?
|
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 411
|
Quote:
In order for some of the other design decisions to happen (web viewing, marketplace) a central repository was decided on, and that influences everything else about the storage and networking of your data. That being said, to simply use RW as a repository for your own use, without sharing or importing, you don't need internet for anything except the initial realm creation. Last edited by MaxSupernova; January 15th, 2015 at 10:09 AM. |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 781
|
Quote:
RW's core design seems to be player view at the table and sync inbetween sessions. Which seems to be right in line with Rob's assesment of no intenet at the table. I know from my experience, my gaming group is one of the most future wielding groups around, we all use computers at the table with live internet and we have a GM player facing monitor. My camaign however will take us to the next level, removing miniatures, paper, by going VTT and RW, thus taking us completely within the electronic frontier, no more paper at all, with RW handling all the information, HL characters and D20 the VTT. I also have a teamspeak server, I am going to also provide a "poly" device so sick players, or travelling players that have internet can still join and play. We will never ever give up the social meeting of the game, ever, but we will hopefuly leverage tech to help us all play weekly, even when the flu tries to say otherwise. Exmortis aka "Scott" RW - Needs Rez spell HL - Game Master/Designer RPG Tools - Campaign Cartographer 3+, D20 Pro Ultimate Real Life - IT Security Hobby - Anything on water or ATV Last edited by Exmortis; January 15th, 2015 at 06:54 AM. |
|
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,147
|
The only internet requirement for RW is for creating new realms. Period. Full stop.
RW's greatest strength and primary focus is in organizing a huge amount of data for the GM. The GM can access any and all information without internet access at any time in any place. The GM can plan, update, run games wherever they want. The only thing a GM cannot do without the internet is create a new realm. RW does exactly what it is advertised to do. RW's desire is to accommodate a lot of different factions with notions of what RW needs to be. Player Edition fueled speculation and inflated hopes as LWD did not manage expectations effectively. What it was in reality and what it was in everyone's mind didn't match and some folks felt let down. Many folks want RW to be the holy grail that integrates everything despite LWD stating very clearly that VTT support and at-the-table synching are planned (and should have been commented on if they are important during the survey) but may not even be on the radar this year for all we know. RW strives to do everything it hasn't been advertised to do. |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 1,517
|
Quote:
ObTopic: Expectations are very hard to manage, but for those with good Internet access at their location an eventual Web client might provide the instant updates they'd like to see. It's more of a when will we see what; the developers have a ton on their plate already. Last edited by Parody; January 15th, 2015 at 12:15 PM. |
|
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,147
|
A rules lawyer at every table.... Thanks @Parody for keeping me honest.
|
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
|
To meander back toward the Thread Topic....
IF there is NO a chance your players might review, peruse, or utilize your realm away from your table... currently ,,, NO. The uses for the RWPE is not particularly helpful... nearly all of what is currently available can be seen at the table via player view. Unless there is a chance your players might review, peruse, or utilize your realm away from your table... and / or IF you have players that cannot make a session or are out of town, on assignment (or in my case) in the military, then it is a means that will grow into a useful access-point for them to keep abreast of and connected with their gaming group. IMO Your mileage may vary depending on expectations and application. DLG |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,623
|
Quote:
I suspect it is much more likely than just "Unless there is a chance". |
|
#20 |
|
|