![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,690
|
If I was to ever to buy or download a rulebook for RW it would be purely to slice up and put the pieces I cared about into my existing articles and to merge stuff like feats and spells into my existing lists of such. I'd never maintain something as a book.
Custom categories make only a limited amount of sense if you use a lot of published material which all follows a single convention. Paizo, for instance, has been very consistent in how they describe settlements and other geographic locations. It would make little sense to deviate from the standard Pathfinder categories of you were using a lot of that material. my Realm Works videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZU...4DwXXkvmBXQ9Yw |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Germany, so please bear with my English
Posts: 377
|
Quote:
I categorize most of my stuff either by location or storyline and the rest just stays in the pre-defined structure like groups, thing lists and such. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 61
|
I actually do both. Sort by book and have my own custom book source tag entries. which is larger than my monitor can actually show at once. Image
I don't know why I want it sorted into books in each of the sections... I wonder about something... I will test something and be back. [edit=1] Before the time of computer entitlement, if we sat down for a game of tabletop roleplaying games, we would need all the books to reference and would have to know exactly where to look, that's why book indexes where valuable, bookmarks of varies kinds and paper notes became vital to the game. Even now, we buy books separated out by content, we buy adventure paths, we download unofficial content via PDF all separated out into subsections, which may or may not at a later date become printed official content. To me, therefore its logical to keep that formation when imputing content. Errata's come out with book and version numbers. We get the information from a book it would seem logical to keep that in book form for data entry. Even D&D Beyond separates its books out, heck it separates it out per chapter. My long term goal is to have each book in realm works as its own separate realm, and when I need to, import the contents into the realms that needs them. [/edit] Last edited by KiwiBlaze; January 2nd, 2019 at 08:20 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,605
|
Quote:
d20pfsrd got rid of the books and put all the relevant information from all sources about a particular subject into the same area. Much easier - it is useful to have a reference within the rule to where it came from (in case you need to quote it to somebody else), which in RW can be done by assigning a tag to an individual snippet. Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 61
|
Whenever I use snippet tags it crashes for me. Thou I literally just found out that was a thing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|