Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago, IL (USA)
Posts: 10,729
|
Quote:
Oh I think I see what is going on. Its some background math HL is doing because of the three classes. So each "class" causes 1 extra skill point to appear. I guess I have to add some more logic to remove higher level int Ability scores. Thanks for the bug report! Hero Lab Resources: Pathfinder - d20pfsrd and Pathfinder Pack Setup 3.5 D&D (d20) - Community Server Setup 5E D&D - Community Server Setup Hero Lab Help - Hero Lab FAQ, Editor Tutorials and Videos, Editor & Scripting Resources. Created by the community for the community - Realm Works kickstarter backer (Alpha Wolf) and Beta tester.- d20 HL package volunteer editor. |
|
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 134
|
Am a bit late to join but would like to add my 2 cents all the same, Perhaps the issue could be rooted out as Good,Poor saves rather then number.
Class A and class B make Class C Take all the good saves from Class A + class B the remainder follow poor save Progression. Thus 1 lvl of Monk/fighter, and 1 lvl of Monk/Ninja would get good progression for all saves for both. Perhaps better worded as Class A + Class B = Class C Fighter + Monk = Fighter Monk = fast save for all 3 saves Class D + Class E = Class F Monk + Ninja = Ninja Monk = Fast saves for all 3 saves Gestalt wasn't really intended to be used to add two Gestalt sets of classes together, But if doing so I would treat each individual one as it's own Class, thus Monk/fighter, and monk Ninja counts as two classes and you don't get to have a lvl 2 monk and a lvl 1 ninja and a lvl 1 fighter instead you get a lvl 1 monk + 1 lvl 1 Monk + a lvl 1 fighter+ a LVL 1 ninja Since Monk Powers don't stack with Monk Powers you reduce it to Monk,Fighter at LVL 1 Ninja at LVL 2 (though Ninja would use the better Saves of the Monk) Should thus be +4 all saves (based on how other multiclassing works, And +1 BAB from the first lvl but +0 from the second again based on how other multiclassing works __________ Edit: to Summarize, Every time you add a New Gestalt combination you are in fact adding a new class, Fighter/Ninja is not 1 lvl of fighter and 1 lvl of ninja it becomes a Gestalt Fighter/Monk. This is Different from the class of Gestalt Monk/Ninja and should in all ways be treated as such. Fighter Ninja becomes Class A we will call Martial Arts Fighter that gives all the bonuses of Fighter + all the bonuses of Monk Ninja/Monk Becomes Class B We will Call Martial Artists Ninja that as it's class powers gives all the benefits of Monk and Ninja You then treat it as taking 1st lvl as Martial Art Fighter, then taking second level as Martial artist Ninja. Treat everything else as if it was any other multiclass option. The powers from each class that stack, stack, the ones that don't won't. Like Chi treat it the same as if two different classes granted you chi (pretty much everything tell you how to deal with this type of situation. Since you show it in the lvl section as Gestalt 1 fighter 1 monk 1 this would become Gestalt 1 fighter 1 Monk 1 Gestalt 1 Ninja 1 Monk 1 Last edited by stargazer_dragon; July 8th, 2014 at 06:50 PM. |
#22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 134
|
Also, though it might just be a pipe dream but I would love to see a class similar to gestalt that let you mix features and such like the playtest classes did without having to use the editor constantly.
I mean like monk/ninja could be a cool themed mix, and alchemist gunslinger or alchemist/artificer ect ect But gestalt is a bit to strong power balance wise, plus showing the classes separately clutters the screen a bit, perhaps show the fighter 1/ninja 1 ect in it's own tab, or even just show gestalt and have it grab the few pieces of overlapping data and calculate them then return everything into a single gestalt tab, thus it acts like a archetype simply modifying the base gestalt class by adding 2 class archetypes. I mean I guess I could actually make a custom class and then custom make a huge list of archtypes for it to in effect do what I am after but I am not sure that's within my ability to code without a huge list of questions and mistakes. |
#23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Fighter 1 // Monk 1 = Ability BAB +1 // +0 = +1 Fort +2 // +2 = +2 Ref +0 // +2 = +2 Will +0 // +2 = +2 HD d10 // d8 = d10 (10 hp since it's 1st level) Skill 2+Int // 4+Int = 4+Int At second level, you want to take a level of Monk and a level of Ninja, you do the same thing, then add the results to the above, like so: Ninja 1 // Monk 2 = Ability BAB +0 // +1 = +1 Fort +0 // +1 = +1 Ref +2 // +1 = +2 Will +0 // +1 = +1 HD d8 // d8 = d8 Skill 6+Int? // 4+Int = 6+Int? (Use the ninja's skill points) You then add the totals for a character sheet that looks like this: Fighter 1/Ninja 1//Monk 2 BAB +2 Fort +3 Ref +4 Will +3 HP 10+d8+(Con*2) SP 10+(Int*2) [Max rank=2, all fighter, ninja, and monk skills are class skills] All special abilities of a level 1 fighter, level 1 ninja, and level 2 monk, i.e. Fighter 1 bonus feat, Monk 1 bonus feat, Monk 2 bonus feat, Improved Unarmed Strike (free w/ Monk 1), proficient with all armor and simple and martial weapons, etc, etc. If we follow your plan, everyone should take monk at every level, b/c they'd end up with base saves of +40 across the board at 20th level. Fighter/Monk, Ninja/Monk, Wizard/Monk, Paladin/Monk, Sorcerer/Monk, Rogue/Monk, Gunslinger/Monk, Barbarian/Monk, Ranger/Monk, Summoner/Monk, and Bard/Monk don't all combine to give you base saves of +22 because they all count as "level 1" of a multiclass build. That would make gestalt even more broken than it already is. Let's say we add a third level and choose to add Ranger 1//Monk 3. We do the same thing as before, compare the benefits and take the best: Ranger 1 // Monk 1 = Ability BAB +1 // +1 = +1 Fort +2 // +0 = +2 Ref +2 // +0 = +2 Will +0 // +0 = +0 HP d10 // d8 = d10 SP 6+Int // 4+Int = 6+Int Our character now looks like this: Fighter 1/Ninja 1/Ranger 1//Monk 3 BAB: +3 Fort: +5 Ref: +6 Will: +3 HP: 10+d10+d8+(Con*3) SP: 16+(Int*3) You've also picked up all of the level 1 abilities for a Fighter, Ninja, and ranger, and all of a Monk's 1-3rd level abilities. |
|
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 68
|
What I think stargazer_dragon was saying was that since Monk has Good Saves all around, that by lvl20, if we had Monk for 20 of those levels, the saves would be +12, +12, +12, regardless of Poor Save adjustments along the way, though possibly having the +1(or +2) bonus for multi-classing a new class in at a given level.
That said, your way of calculating things, darthgator, is how I had always calculated them (baring 3.5 and pathfinder rules differences) back in 3.5 |
#25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 134
|
Not fully what I meant, however after reading and refreshing myself on gestalt (has been a while since I used it) I realize that what I ment wasn't correct ether.
Gestalt is actually not considered multi-classing. Since rules of gestalt state that you choose two classes each level a level 2 gestalt could be 1 theif and 2 monk and 1 ninja, but since he isn't multiclassing the saves would be based off of the better progression, meaning you would gain Monk saves. If you took monk, rouge at first then wizard sorce at second your saves would gain the bonus from fast progression at lvl 1 and wizard/sorce progression at lvl 2. Seams like this could be pretty hard to program though Perhaps using the optional fraction rules would be a lot better. """The progressions of base attack bonuses and base save bonuses in the Player’s Handbook increase at a fractional rate, but those fractions are eliminated due to rounding. For single-class characters, this rounding isn’t signifi cant, but for multiclass characters, this rounding often results in reduced base attack and base save bonuses. For example, a 1st-level rogue/1st-level wizard has a base attack bonus (BAB) of +0 from each class, resulting in a total BAB of +0. But that’s only due to the rounding of each fractional value down to 0 before adding them together—the character actually has BAB +3/4 from her rogue level and BAB +1/2 from her wizard level. If the rounding was done after adding together the fractional values, rather than before, the character would have BAB +1 (rounded down from 1-1/4)."""" |
#26 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago, IL (USA)
Posts: 10,729
|
Disclaimer: If this post sounds like I am attacking anyone "I am not". I am annoyed at not getting this concept. So my writing may "show" that but its not at anyone on these boards. Its at the concept that is really not making me happy!
I have to start with I am still confused. Sorry but I am not fully getting this which means trying to program it is not possible. I need to be able to do the math by hand before I can script it right. Quote:
We are less than a normal Monk 2 Rogue 1: Fort +3 Ref +5 Will +3 We take the "better value" but for saves your saying we first have to "calculate" the value and then take the delta of it. Why? I still can't find a real answer anywhere I look and this sort of sounds like its your groups houserule (not an insult here). That you found this to work the best and it maybe it does. Also based on just here alone on these boards I have seen a half-dozen different answers to the question. Seems like their is no real clear cut answer. I see many groups asking to use fractional values as its easier (stargazer mentions that above). For those that use gestalt rules is this "delta" saves rules really the correct method? Is this what everyone who plans to use this addon want? Hero Lab Resources: Pathfinder - d20pfsrd and Pathfinder Pack Setup 3.5 D&D (d20) - Community Server Setup 5E D&D - Community Server Setup Hero Lab Help - Hero Lab FAQ, Editor Tutorials and Videos, Editor & Scripting Resources. Created by the community for the community - Realm Works kickstarter backer (Alpha Wolf) and Beta tester.- d20 HL package volunteer editor. |
|
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 134
|
ok by book it say
""Base Saving Throw Bonuses: For each save bonus, choose the better progression from the two classes. For example, a 1st-level gestalt fighter/wizard would have base saving throw bonuses of Fortitude +2, Reflex +0, Will +2—taking the good Fortitude save from the fighter class and the good Will save from the wizard class."" Last edited by stargazer_dragon; July 15th, 2014 at 05:24 PM. Reason: worded it better later |
#28 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 68
|
Disclaimer accepted and seconded, I am attempting to be as rational on this matter as I can as well. It is a frustration that does seem to be spreading. The following, unless quoted is my own intuition/thoughts, after attempting to sift through the ideas I have seen, not any official rulings, and there may be some variants out there that I have missed.
Dual Class Gestalt is the easiest to calculate and adjudicate. SC's addon already handles most of that beautifully(and hopefully all, once out of beta) With all of the various rules that came out in Unearthed Arcana, WotC did not have a lot of space to lay down a lot exposition on all of the rules, so the base rules as given were pretty thin and open to interpretation. Many of the rules in this book did make it into Pathfinder (traits, drawbacks, bloodlines, variant classes(archtypes)) in one way, shape, form, or fashion. Many number crunchers looked at Gestalt and wondered what would happen if the gestalt character dipped a level into X or Y. The points that have any reference on this idea are as follows : Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
#29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 134
|
Edit: reworded in later post to be more clear
Last edited by stargazer_dragon; July 15th, 2014 at 05:25 PM. |
#30 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|