![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,622
|
Quote:
I might investigate creating the content twice within the same topic - once as per the "revealed" state; and the second as the full content, putting this second section inside a "secret" style. Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,622
|
1.5 is now available
The processing for REVEALED state has been improved, so that the journal entry only contains the revealed information (including normal text for links to unrevealed topics). The full text of the imported topics is available by using the "GM Notes" module (available from the normal Foundry module import window, or manually by using https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sy...er/module.json) Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,622
|
1.6 is out
Configuration options are provided to set the default scene padding and grid size. Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal Last edited by Farling; October 24th, 2021 at 02:15 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 77
|
Cool.
I was thinking the GM Notes way of doing unrevealed info might work well, but after playing around with it a bit, it isn't as useful as I hoped. One issue with it is that the incoming links can contain spoilers. Like, for instance, maybe "Lord Evil" the party's nemesis is a (partially) revealed topic, but when they look at the "Gwendolyn the friendly innkeeper" entry they probably shouldn't see an incoming link from Lord Evil who they don't know has anything to do with her. Maybe the incoming and outgoing links should always be secret? That would make navigating a little bit harder for players in some situations unless the GM manually reveals links where they thought it would help (which would make it harder for the GM, etc). I'm not sure what the best option for that is. The GM Notes window is a bit awkward. I think I'd probably go for just having it in a big secret section at the end of the original topic like you were thinking about before. Of course, that has cons also, because then there isn't anyway to tell the difference between things that were marked in RW as GM secrets/false information other than staring at it in line by line comparison looking for differences. |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,622
|
Quote:
Although, it seems that the main topic name will always be revealed if the topic is revealed (the "true name" doesn't need to be revealed though). Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal Last edited by Farling; October 26th, 2021 at 05:03 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,622
|
Quote:
Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
The "Faerunian Multiverse" topic gives examples, where RW has no content links showing for players, but Foundry has several. (The revealed relationship is working correctly). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,622
|
Could you PM me a link to the RWexport for your realm? The one you previously gave me was a RWoutput file. :-)
Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,622
|
Quote:
The OUT links are not honouring the revealed state of the snippets/map_pins in which they appear within the current topic. The IN links are not honouring the revealed state of all occurrences in snippets/map_pins of the OTHER topic. Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal Last edited by Farling; October 30th, 2021 at 04:02 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,622
|
Version 1.7 is available
FIX: In revealed topics, the content links should only show links to the topics where the snippets/map_pins containing the link have been revealed. FEATURE: Initial attempt at decoding some journal entries as Items instead of Journal Entries (currently only for PF1 and English RW category names). Farling Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|