Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 676
|
In the menu for adding new update sources, it would be nice if we could have a user-editable text box to associate a label with each source. This would give us a way to easily identify what content each source provides (other than the URL, which isn't always obvious).
Bonus points if it could read a property in the remote XML file to auto-populate the field. |
#1 |
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,213
|
This is already available, but you need to formally define the source in a .1st file, instead of quick-defining it in the editor.
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago, IL (USA)
Posts: 10,729
|
I am guessing that he means the Secondary Update URL that people enter on the Find Updates screen. Or at least that is my thoughts as TheIronGolem knows how to define .1st files.
Hero Lab Resources: Pathfinder - d20pfsrd and Pathfinder Pack Setup 3.5 D&D (d20) - Community Server Setup 5E D&D - Community Server Setup Hero Lab Help - Hero Lab FAQ, Editor Tutorials and Videos, Editor & Scripting Resources. Created by the community for the community - Realm Works kickstarter backer (Alpha Wolf) and Beta tester.- d20 HL package volunteer editor. |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 676
|
To be clear, I'm referring to this:
I know from the first URL that this is Shadow's Community package. And I know that the next two are my Spheres of Power projects, but I only know that because I'm the one who wrote them. And I can't tell by looking at the URL which is the core book and which is the expansion book I'm working on. This will only get more confusing in the future as there are at least 20 more books in the future (one handbook for each "sphere" of magic in that system). That's not a big deal for me personally since I have reason to track these URL's anyway. But I'm thinking that our customers might like have an easy way of seeing which source updates which expansion, for things like troubleshooting or removing individual books they don't want anymore. Not a huge deal, of course, but it would be a nice convenience. |
#4 |
|
|