[Bug Reports] Warriors of Chaos - Page 16

EdSteiner · November 5th, 2013, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infyrna

When you give any lord or hero class a talisman that bestows a ward save and then give them mark of Tzeentch, it separates the ward saves instead of reducing it. Armours that bestow ward saves still work correctly.

Fixed for 2.67

Cenobite451 · 04:27 AM

-Allure of Slaanesh states Sorcerers Only in description (though it seems to function correctly)
-Warshrine lists crew as "Chaos Shiremaster" and "Chaos Shire Bearers" (I didn't know hobbits lived that far north...)
-Scaled Skin gift lists effect on second line in roster output (first line is empty), and simply lists effect as "Scaly Skin" with no mention of the value of the save (5+)
-Warshrine entry has extra semicolon following Protections of the Dark Gods in description (which should also read "Protection")

Alright, I know - now I'm just being picky. ;p

EdSteiner · November 13th, 2013, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cenobite451

-Allure of Slaanesh states Sorcerers Only in description (though it seems to function correctly)
-Warshrine lists crew as "Chaos Shiremaster" and "Chaos Shire Bearers" (I didn't know hobbits lived that far north...)
-Scaled Skin gift lists effect on second line in roster output (first line is empty), and simply lists effect as "Scaly Skin" with no mention of the value of the save (5+)
-Warshrine entry has extra semicolon following Protections of the Dark Gods in description (which should also read "Protection")

Alright, I know - now I'm just being picky. ;p

Never worry about being picky, that's what I want to help make better files.

Corrected for 2.68

Cenobite451 · November 22nd, 2013, 04:03 AM

If you aren't sick of me yet (well, even if you are I suppose...):

-Forsaken of Nurgle don't have Fear added to their special rules section
-Forsaken of Tzeentch are (erroneously) given a 6+ Ward save

EdSteiner · November 22nd, 2013, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cenobite451

If you aren't sick of me yet (well, even if you are I suppose...):

-Forsaken of Nurgle don't have Fear added to their special rules section
-Forsaken of Tzeentch are (erroneously) given a 6+ Ward save

I never get tired of making the files better..

Fixed for 2.68

Cenobite451 · 01:51 AM

Well in that case:

-Chaos Familiar gift: "knows one extra spell then normal for his level" should be "knows one more spell than normal for his level" (or could simply be framed as "knows one extra spell", although that's arguably a little less clear)

EdSteiner · November 23rd, 2013, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cenobite451

Well in that case:

-Chaos Familiar gift: "knows one extra spell then normal for his level" should be "knows one more spell than normal for his level" (or could simply be framed as "knows one extra spell", although that's arguably a little less clear)

Yum Yum Yum

Fixed for 2.68

Cenobite451 · November 30th, 2013, 04:56 AM

Oh, ooh! Can I sneak in one more for 2.68?

-Skull of Katam: "unit is removed as causality" should be "unit is removed as casualty"

And if I'm going to be really picky (and you know I am)...

-Skull of Katam: effect description uses both "channeling" and "channelling". I believe both are correct (regardless of what my browser's spellcheck might say...), but you should probably pick one and stick with it. (The army book seems to use the double-L version, for the record.)

EdSteiner · November 30th, 2013, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cenobite451

Oh, ooh! Can I sneak in one more for 2.68?

-Skull of Katam: "unit is removed as causality" should be "unit is removed as casualty"

And if I'm going to be really picky (and you know I am)...

-Skull of Katam: effect description uses both "channeling" and "channelling". I believe both are correct (regardless of what my browser's spellcheck might say...), but you should probably pick one and stick with it. (The army book seems to use the double-L version, for the record.)

Done n done for 2.68

Cenobite451 · December 3rd, 2013, 01:52 AM

Ack! Stumbled across a couple more...

-Chaos Warshrine:
--Favour of the Ruinous Powers: "If friendly model within 12" or one or more Chaos Warshires when he rolls on the Eye of the Gods[...]" should be something along the lines of "If friendly model within 12" of one or more Chaos Warshrines rolls on the Eye of the Gods table[...]" (there are a couple of other ways to frame it, but that seems like the shortest)
--Giver of Glory: "[...] for the Favour of the Ruinous Powers special rule" should be "[...] from the Favour of the Ruinous Powers special rule"

I blame the hobbits, personally. ;p

Cenobite451 Junior Member Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 11 November 22nd, 2013, 04:03 AM	If you aren't sick of me yet (well, even if you are I suppose...): -Forsaken of Nurgle don't have Fear added to their special rules section -Forsaken of Tzeentch are (erroneously) given a 6+ Ward save
#154

Cenobite451 Junior Member Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 11 November 23rd, 2013, 01:45 AM	Well in that case: -Chaos Familiar gift: "knows one extra spell then normal for his level" should be "knows one more spell than normal for his level" (or could simply be framed as "knows one extra spell", although that's arguably a little less clear) Last edited by Cenobite451; November 23rd, 2013 at 01:51 AM.
#156