Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
|
The purpose of this thread is to include not only reviews from the forum community but to consolidate reviews from elsewhere that might interest the community as a whole. It is not intended as a "feature request" (as this is governed elsewhere), nor to create a "flame thread". This will help provide Rob and his team with feedback (positive & negative) without polluting other threads that "drill down" to details.
I listed this a a new thread, 1> to not continue a conversation that was detailed to a particular feature (calendars in this case) 2> can serve as a repository of review and critique if we all use it as such and act as adults. Last edited by Dark Lord Galen; July 1st, 2014 at 04:04 PM. Reason: Define why I put on new thread |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
|
I'll start,
Rob had stated elsewhere that the community only sees a portion of the feed back of desired functionality. That got me to thinking (dangerous in these parts) so I did abit of research on reviews and found these: While the entirety of the review is not listed (the link is) my focus was to determine if there were negative or most requested items and were they being addressed. Here we go.... Quote:
Quote:
Funny how the LAN integration's were also mentioned (seem to recall saying that here) and disagree, I have Masterplan, and other than the calendar (yea sorry Rob, my pet peeve) RW is far superior in all other aspects. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So "final" tally for negative review points Player Access No Print Capability No LAN support PC based ONLY at this time Fees for Cloud Use Steep Learning Curve All in all the reviews of the software from multiple sources are HIGHLY positive. Last edited by Dark Lord Galen; July 1st, 2014 at 04:12 PM. Reason: Added Quote boxes for legibility |
|||||||
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
|
My REVIEW of FEATURE Milestones
Below is a snippet (IN BLACK) from the kickstarter posting detailing what Realm works DOES (based on the posted selling points of the kickstarter) and what the Kickstarter hoped to accomplish as funding goals… The comments (listed in blue) will relate to what is actually an accomplished milestone as of 7/1/14 https://www.kickstarter.com/projects...campaign-tools Quote:
Kickstarter Comment The purpose of the kickstarter as defined in its listing was to incorporate the player integrations and set the cloud “aloft”. • $170k was collected and earmarked to hire additional programmers to primarily meet 2 milestones (containing 10 benchmarks) and if timing allowed, the integrations of “other features” (business speak for other things we think of that we can fill in with along the way that do not impede our milestone goals). • From a business model, (and as a manager myself) I can understand Rob’s concern. Of the 2 milestones & 10 benchmark targets, only one milestone has been partly met and only 5 of the benchmarks that support them. This equates to 50%, which any sane manager would not like seeing. Especially since he obtained public financing. Last edited by Dark Lord Galen; July 1st, 2014 at 06:13 PM. Reason: Added Quote & Bullet numbers for clarity, Changed Color for clarity |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
|
Lastly, is a closing critique by me. This is not with malice nor intended as a slight to the great effort LWD, Rob, and his team have done sofar, but as a semi varnished view only.
Summary Out of the 34 “Features Included” 30 of the milestone markers have been met. Out of 4 remaining, 3 directly relate to calendar creation and one defines the ability to create family trees. That is 88% of features reported on Realm Works kickstarter as "Included" that it can do RIGHT NOW…. The only glaring fail is currently the custom calendar. This was part of the “included features” and a selling point that was suggested as “nearly complete”. This however, cannot be construed as a success to deliver, but as a failure. RW fails to deliver on a feature already sold as included. Rob’s concern (not to imply speaking for him) has refocused to justifying the faith that we the community place in LWD & him ($170k worth via the kickstarter + those early purchasers) in delivering what we purchased. If I were in his place I would certainly place my team’s focus on those that already fronted their hard earned dollars. Unfortunately he has had to make this decision shorthanded (as in lacking programmers) and at the expense of not completing the “featured milestones.” Nowhere were we promised 1>print capabilities 2>spellchecking 3>LAN management, etc. These (and many more) are above and beyond the promised deliverables. Though we as a community may wish for MORE or IMPROVED features, Rob and His team have delivered on many "wishes", hunted a multitude of bugs, red herrings, and appeasements. However, the fact of focus remains all but the four Items within the featured and the five within the Kickstarter goals remain. Rob has conveyed where he and his team will focus (thanks for that) Rob, we as a community in turn have a reasonable right to expect, not for you to fulfill on wishes and desires (that's a perk), but on points already agreed. 1> Custom Calendar 2> Player Access 3> the ability for GMs (prefer DMs myself) to share and collaborate information These are the remaining promised deliverables..... Do I like that the calendars have been deferred for the player access,,,,, No, but I understand it from a business model and Rob's point of view.... doesn't make me like it... but guess what... its his call... The only thing left to say is...... How can we help? |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 1,516
|
Just so you know, I find your green comments impossible to read on the default forum theme. (You've got light green text on light blue and off-white background.)
Last edited by Parody; July 1st, 2014 at 06:01 PM. |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 16
|
http://ghmaps.net/realm-works-a-few-...nto-a-new-era/
I love Anna Meyers work on Greyhawk maps and she has provided her impressions of Realm Works. BTW, check this excellent GH map - be sure to zoom in http://ghmaps.net/onlinemap/onlinehexhd.html |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
|
Quote:
My monitors have custom color settings and I forget that sometimes Quote:
|
||
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Grand Forks ND
Posts: 129
|
I think you need to consider for a moment that Rob touches on text in the video on the kickstarter page at 1:36 he states that text is the cornerstone of any campaign he then extolls on how realmworks has any of the features you would expect from a word processor. that he showcases fonts and styles and does not mention Spell check or printing does not matter one little bit. The implication is there for everyone to see and hear.
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707
|
Quote:
I think, however, you stretch the "implication". And by that alone, its does matter more than "a little bit". Not to "rule munger or lawyereeze "but "many does not equal all". On pausing the video and even reviewing the highlighted pieces, there are selections for Right, Center, and Left justify, Bold and Italic, as well as font types, table building, find/ replace (my favorite part that could have easily been overlooked), etc... All are parts of most word processor. Nowhere to be found is a print button nor a spell check. (though personally a print or PDF feature would be nice) Further, anyone with any exposure to various software would have to agree that realmworks more closely resembles a data base (akin to C+, Dbase3/4, Access, Alpha4, etc) than a word processor. I think that it will in time have these features, but the critique was confined to what was to be provided by the kickstarter. That is why I based the critique on the listed features, and the target goals as listed.... not the forum desires. Lastly, critiques are like opinions, we all have them, it is for each of us to interpret and determine if the goals have won our hard earned $. So keep them observations, and reviews coming. |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 865
|
I think comparing it to a DB, while valid, isnt a valid argument for discussing the kickstarter. Also, not everyone is going to have a technical background and realize that its more akin to a database.
By comparing it to a word processor during the kickstarter, expectations were set. I think that it was stated during the time, that most of the non cloud features were set and the kickstarter was for the cloud work. I just went through the comments in the kickstarter. Printing is specifically mentioned there in response to a question from a user, back during the kickstarter time. So expectations were definitely set. "There's no feature to export all maps en masse. However, you can export individual elements. You will also be able to select multiple content elements for printing. So if you're just trying to generate a PDF, you could select multiple elements and print them, outputting them as PDF instead. You can definitely differentiate whether you're printing content for yourself or the players, with the latter only including material that has been revealed." So while you're right that the kickstarter goals were for the cloud work, a lot of information was mentioned during the kickstarter, and definitely implied. Dont get me wrong, I like the software, but i also understand where other people are coming from. The kickstarter, in my opinion, did a bad job at managing expectations. If the print wasn't ready, Rob should have more carefully parsed his words in the comment. "Printing, while not yet ready, will be this....". Last edited by mirtos; July 3rd, 2014 at 07:08 AM. |
#10 |
|
|