Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 729
|
Release Notes: Be sure to print or remember your roster builds as many saved rosters will not work. You can of course re-create them, unless they were illegal builds and I finally caught them with rules validations.
• Wood Elves - (See Race Notes for additional details) - No Special Characters • Bug Fixes (Typos, other small stuff) Please if you find a bug or text error please try and cite the error and provide a book page reference or in the case of FAQ errata, cite the army FAQ and so forth. If you find a programming error, IE (Something does not work) give an example on how to recreate the glitch. You can use either the auto-update feature or DL manually from http://dl.dropbox.com/s/ipraujrlrp2z2fy/WF8_2.75.ab |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
|
I dont' wish to re-ignite a long running debate, which has been played out on other forums. but it appears you've chosen to code the enchanted arrows as a one per army option.
I urge you to reconsider this since most TOs in the UK, as well as the ETC committee have agreed that they CAN be duplicated. It could be some time until GW themselves issue an FAQ on the matter. Cheers! |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 729
|
While I have followed the various debates and several TO/ETC comments. I coded it to strict RAW, like the duplication of runes to avoid pride issues. This is just another case of poorly written GW products. "Now go eat some pretzels n drink beer, we don't care just drop more on our stuff". My views on GW customer service.
|
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
|
Fair enough mate. Thanks for responding, and also for making the file!!
|
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1
|
You can only take up to 11 Waywatchers on this update. There is no limit to the number you are allowed in a unit anymore.
|
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
|
The same ruling has been made by many GT TOs in the U.S. The good news for AB is that EdSteiner has chosen to code it to simply display as an error rather than disallowing the choice entirely. So nothing stops us from creating WE lists as we see fit and TOs may just ignore the "error" if they choose. A fine compromise.
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 729
|
My thoughts when I coded it exactly.
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 729
|
|
#8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|