Quote:
Originally Posted by ruhar
Chemlak, if you're going to tell the story of why calendars priority got dropped down you need to tell the WHOLE story.
The survey included players and we all know that in a game there are more players than GMs. As a result, there were more players responding than GMs. Players don't need no stinking calendars so they made that their lowest priority.
|
EXACTLY THIS... And to add that LWD was under the mistaken perception that the "RW Players Edition" wouldn't be DOA and give them a reason to justify why the players vote should even be considered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruhar
When the votes were counted calendars got a low priority. Honestly, I think the players were Russian.
|
Now that's Funny
Lastly, for any that truely run any type of sandbox campaign, time tracking is essential is the WHY calendars are so important.
The only thing (since LWD woke up and realized the need of 64bit) that I would remotely slide calendars for is character level journals and AND integration with the DM's version of RW.
The only reason I would be supportive of this is I have 8 players that feel they totally wasted their money in purchasing the Players Version.