On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:46:20 +0100, Jimi <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk>
wrote:
>> That is a very reasonable tactic. They already do that with their
>> miniatures,
>
> GW events expect GW models to be used - if you turn up with a Rackham
> army
> then expect it to be refused entry.
But it would be so funny to see the looks on the organizers faces. I've
often thought of scaring up models from a bygone age like the "beaky"
space marines for a GT. Just to see their forehead veins bulge.
"Look, these are GW models!"
>
>> What would GW do about things like Warhammer? Currently, there is no
>> official equivalent for Warhammer.
>
> If the 40k IAL works and sells well, then I can see a Warhammer version.
And a version for all their other games too. Probably a version that you'd
have to buy separately for each one.
>
>> What about armies that are not (yet) officially supported by IAL, but
>> are
>> real 40K armies?
>
> That puts us in the same boat as we have now with 40k armies not
> appearing
> in the 40k datafiles - its a wait and see scenario.
Indeed, but given GW's history I'd put money on GW jerking Lone Wolf
around. Good riddance, the more people they alienate and drive away
from their crap games the better.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE Cell Phones with up to $400 Cash Back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_bBUKB/vYx...gGAA/IMSolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/