Lone Wolf Development Forums

Lone Wolf Development Forums (http://forums.wolflair.com/index.php)
-   Warhammer Fantasy 8th Ed. (http://forums.wolflair.com/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   [Bug Reports] Dwarfs (http://forums.wolflair.com/showthread.php?t=13110)

EdSteiner October 16th, 2014 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glimfeather (Post 195263)
Thank You!

Your welcome

Tiger Dave October 25th, 2014 02:35 PM

Adding shields to Rangers does not enable the 6)+ parry in WSv. Also happened to Thane General embedded in Longbeards with Shields but am unable to recreate this.

EdSteiner October 25th, 2014 02:45 PM

No parry save BC rangers have great weapons.

glimfeather November 8th, 2014 06:27 PM

Ed,

Just downloaded the 2.84 update. If you select a Runesmith as a General (while having a Thane as a BSB for example) you get an error message indicating that the general must be the highest Ld character. This didn't happen on previous / recent changes since the new book. There was some debate on this issue and I'm just wondering if you guys have changed your mind on this?

Caledor November 9th, 2014 09:46 AM

We're currently discussing the matter.

EDIT: it's going to be reverted to how it was before with 2.85.

ghstgry February 16th, 2015 08:50 PM

v2.88 file allows runes on Great Weapons
 
2.88 allows runes on Great Weapons. Can't do that...though I wish you could. :(

Pg. 59: Rule of Form: "Weapon runes can only be inscribed on weapons (always hand weapons)..."

EdSteiner February 17th, 2015 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghstgry (Post 203923)
2.88 allows runes on Great Weapons. Can't do that...though I wish you could. :(

Pg. 59: Rule of Form: "Weapon runes can only be inscribed on weapons (always hand weapons)..."

Nothing prohibits a model from having both a great weapon and a runic weapon. Example from 2.88 a dwarf lord is S4 so his line show S4+* for his stat line ok, now add that great weapon, it move to S4+*/6+* which is correct. Ok then add a runic weapon and you see it drops back to S4+*. So what is the issue, since again by rule that is correct as runic weapon over rides great weapon. Please review my comments and see if you follow my logic steps.

ghstgry February 17th, 2015 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdSteiner (Post 203934)
Nothing prohibits a model from having both a great weapon and a runic weapon. Example from 2.88 a dwarf lord is S4 so his line show S4+* for his stat line ok, now add that great weapon, it move to S4+*/6+* which is correct. Ok then add a runic weapon and you see it drops back to S4+*. So what is the issue, since again by rule that is correct as runic weapon over rides great weapon. Please review my comments and see if you follow my logic steps.

I suppose there really isn't an issue if you know the rules. My concern is that someone will choose a GW and then throw a bunch of weapon runes on the character, thinking that they're pumping up a GW. And while I understand that the software explicitly removes the +2 Str for a GW from the model's stats, that player might argue that "the software is wrong", etc.

I'd ask to have the GW option greyed when runes have been applied, but I suppose there is that very minute chance that the character's runic weapon could be destroyed, thus forcing him to fall back on his other weapon(s). In that case, having a GW in addition to the runic HW would actually be valid.

I guess it seems potentially confusing as is. I leave it to your judgement on how to handle it.

EdSteiner February 17th, 2015 12:55 PM

Maybe the "in play consideration "x"" like when a great weapon and shield are taken. Will tinker.

ghstgry February 17th, 2015 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EdSteiner (Post 203956)
Maybe the "in play consideration "x"" like when a great weapon and shield are taken. Will tinker.

Some kind of warning next to the GW option might work. Not sure how you can do that though.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
wolflair.com copyright 1998-2016 Lone Wolf Development, Inc. View our Privacy Policy here.