Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jonesboro, AR (USA)
Posts: 858
|
Is there any update on when we can expect PF 1E to arrive on HLO?
And a follow up question: Is this something that's even being actively worked on right now? If not, is there any guess as to when y'all will start actively working on it? And a final follow up: If there's no guess as to when you'll start working on it, are there still definite plans to actually make it happen? Or is it relegated to the "maybe, someday, if we have time" category? Thanks in advance for any info you can provide. Last edited by Maidhc O Casain; January 29th, 2020 at 10:53 AM. |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver, Canada.
Posts: 818
|
I'm sure a lot of PF 1E people would like to try the campaign theater, and it would be beneficial to Lone Wolf to have ongoing revenue from long time customers now that there aren't new data packages for the system.
For our group, we'd need 3pp packages to be live too (community package and spheres), before it would benefit our group. But just getting PF onto HLO would be a great start. |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 460
|
I think the lack of a response answers your question. I think what we already have is all there will be for PF1. I don't think there is enough interest for Lone Wolf to spend the money to put PF1 on HL Online.
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 691
|
PF1 in HLO is still a future possibility, we haven't announced one way or another.
From a technical perspective, PF1 is an especially complex case compared to bringing a brand new game on board, as all of Starfinder, PF2, and SR6 have been. PF1 has been around FOREVER, and has mountains of content associated with it. Much of this content was developed against an older codebase that has since been upgraded, so we're faced with the choice of either a) bring the old content up to the new technical standard, or b) re-implement lots of old moldy code in the newer codebase to support the old content as-is. Both of these options are time-intensive. People also have TONS of pre-existing characters that they will want a way to convert/bring over/import. Much of our infrastructure for PF1 and it's content packages predate HLO, in some cased by quite a lot, so we'd be looking at reconciling our old sales system vs the new. Delivering this all at once is basically a non-starter, as we'd have to go dark for an effective eternity to make that happen. So internally, we've been trying to see if there are viable ways to deliver this monstrosity in meaningful chunks while still making progress toward the overall end goal. Breaking it into chunks introduces it's own complexity and pitfalls, so there's no easy answer. |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
If bringing PF1 across is too difficult, what does that mean for all the other systems? Current RPG's: Pathfinder (GM), Pathfinder (Player), Gamma World (GM, Pathfinder homebrew). HeroLab: 3.5 & Pathfinder. HL User Files for PF: Greyhawk Setting, Gamma World (WIP). DM and player of D&D since 1980. |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
I personally would really like to see PF1 for HLO because that is what I play mostly. But I already own most of the PF1 packages, so they wouldn't get any new money from me and I am already using Starfinder for HLO so the annual maintenance cost would not be "new" income. Now I would support a kickstarter to hire a contract developer to do the porting... |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 302
|
The old info being translated into the new database/codebase is beginning to look like a hand input job.
That would make the way toward HLO getting PF1 a lot harder if that is the case. |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jonesboro, AR (USA)
Posts: 858
|
I have HLO for Starfinder, but I bought it for 2 very specific case uses. I was in a Starfinder game that we played just to see what it was like, and I wanted to take a look at HLO. My group was done with Starfinder after 1 session, and I won't be playing PF2 or Shadowrun. I might play Savage Worlds, but I've seen nothing to indicate it's coming to HLO. So once they start charging for server access to HLO I'm done with that, and I have lifetime server access for Realm Works. Which means that if PF1 and/or SWADE don't get ported over to HLO, LoneWolf will not have anything else I'm interested in paying for and will not be getting any more of my money (maybe I'll buy a couple more RW products like the Beastiaries, but even that's not really likely).
This is not said in anger - I understand the difficulty of making these decisions. It's just a fact. Well OK, to be fair, I AM a little angry that once again it seems they've promised something they will end up not delivering. It IS disappointing. I've happily supported LW for years and years both by spending my money and (mostly) singing their praises. I am sad that I'll likely not have reason to do so any longer. Last edited by Maidhc O Casain; January 31st, 2020 at 04:31 PM. |
#8 |
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 691
|
Quote:
My main goal here is to give my technical insights as best as I understand them. |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jonesboro, AR (USA)
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
|
|
#10 |
|
|