Lone Wolf Development Forums  

Go Back   Lone Wolf Development Forums > Realm Works Forums > Realm Works Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Bidmaron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 468

Old July 18th, 2018, 06:48 AM
Well, we should probably remember that our good friend kbs just underwent serious surgery and might not quite be himself right now.

Kbs, I hope you are doing well, and forgive us if we are grousing about your behavior if it is drug-induced. I hope you heal well and quickly.
Bidmaron is offline   #11 Reply With Quote
Acenoid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 798

Old July 18th, 2018, 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxSupernova View Post
Look at us, squabbling amongst ourselves just to keep busy while LWD completely ignores us.

Who? What? Where?
:P

Really ridiculous that rules cannot be protected. At least for some time they should have an exclusive like in pharma industry and other process where the first inventor invested much more time / money to develop the idea, than the copycats.

Join the (unofficial) Realm-Works IRC Chat: #realm-works on the Rizon Network (https://wiki.rizon.net/index.php?title=Servers)
-> Browser Client: https://kiwiirc.com/client/irc.rizon.net
Acenoid is offline   #12 Reply With Quote
Farling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Greater London, UK
Posts: 2,623

Old July 18th, 2018, 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acenoid View Post
Really ridiculous that rules cannot be protected. At least for some time they should have an exclusive like in pharma industry and other process where the first inventor invested much more time / money to develop the idea, than the copycats.
I think the general issue with game rules is that most games are a mix of little bits from lots of other games. Pretty much nothing is truly original. Probably the only copyright/trademark/patent could relate to a particular combination of lots of little bits.

Farling

Author of the Realm Works Import tool, Realm Works Output tool and Realm Works to Foundry module

Donations gratefully received via Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal
Farling is offline   #13 Reply With Quote
ErinRigh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 621

Old July 20th, 2018, 02:08 AM
Rules can definitely be protected, it is Mechanics that can't be. Hasbro definitely could protect the rules of D&D but they couldn't stop you from making a game that used the same six attributes (Strength, Dexterity, etc). They could prevent you from calling it anything to do with Dungeons and Dragons, or even from probably naming it Dungeons and Demons, as an obvious derivative, but the basic mechanics such as spellcasting and attacking cannot be prevented
ErinRigh is offline   #14 Reply With Quote
Dark Lord Galen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707

Old July 20th, 2018, 05:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErinRigh View Post
.................... or even from probably naming it Dungeons and Demons, as an obvious derivative,............
Spot on Erin... EXCEPT above... they tried on more than one occasion to eliminate competition via that... it was tossed, and not derivative....
Tunnels & Trolls in late 70s was first that came to my mind and was attacked by then TSR, and later again by WOC in 2005.

Gygax Magazine (yea that Gygax) was a periodical in similar form to Dragon Magazine and again was attacked via WOC/Hazbro, and again tossed as not related to the IP they held over World of Greyhawk (something I keep up with in detail). And after personally speaking with Luke Gygax on this, the basis of claim ironically was the very name itself. The court ruled that a man has the right to his own name was the basis of dismissal. Unfortunately in this particular case, it ended up quagmired in an internal family battle and died.

And lastly...
Mazes & Monsters, which by any standard was a blatant aim at D&D... and any growing up in the late 70s / early 80s will tell you an impact on the game... but again tossed not once but twice since they (as you note in your post above) were not RPGs but a Novel & made for TV Movie....
The follow up book "The Dungeon Master" couldn't get any bolder at "re-use" of a name...
And while WOC could continue filing suits... at some point they reach the law of diminishing return... I suppose....

DLG

D&D> Pre 1e White Box Edition, 1e, 2e, 3.5 Currently, Set in the World of Greyhawk (The first, longest running and Best Campaign Setting)
Software>Extensive use of all forms of MS Products, Visual Studio 2012, DAZ 3d, AutoCAD, Adobe Products.
Gaming Specific>Campaign Cartographer, D20 Pro Alpha & BattleGrounds Beta Tester, World Builder, Dungeon Crafter, LWD Hero Lab, Realm Works, Inkwell Ideas Citybuilder & Dungeon Builder, Auto-Realm, Dundjinni
Contributing Writer for TSR, WOC, & Canonfire
Dark Lord Galen is offline   #15 Reply With Quote
ErinRigh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 621

Old July 20th, 2018, 06:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Galen View Post
Spot on Erin... EXCEPT...

<Numerous examples of my wrongness>

And while WOC could continue filing suits... at some point they reach the law of diminishing return... I suppose....

DLG
Ok, I sit corrected and educated :-). I agree that it is mostly a waste of time and resources to pursue these things for 99% of offenders, but WotC ARE notoriously bad for going after copyright infringement.
ErinRigh is offline   #16 Reply With Quote
Dark Lord Galen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707

Old July 20th, 2018, 06:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErinRigh View Post
Ok, I sit corrected and educated :-). I agree that it is mostly a waste of time and resources to pursue these things for 99% of offenders, but WotC ARE notoriously bad for going after copyright infringement.
OH VERY MUCH AGREE on the WOC observation.... even when they have no basis for it....
I have a friend (shameless Plug for Casey below) that published some work they did as a collective on The World of Greyhawk- Bandit Kingdoms... and they went after him...
Now understand, he was a non-paid lead member of what was called the "triad" back in what was termed "Living-Greyhawk" in the early 2000's. And all he did was assemble the work many did under one binded book so to speak. He credited them, and basically the cost to print was a wash vs profit, but WOC filed anyway... after 3 different meetings through arbitration, they finally pulled the suit....

Ironically the only ones that would use the perioditcal would be Greyhawk users, which facilitates WOC and their IP and product.... They were just butt hurt that he was able to assemble the various originating authors when they couldn't.

But in this lawsuit happy world we live in, you can sue anyone for anything .... logic and reason to be determined later... *snark*

For all you Greyhawkers following along....
>Casey's Work>http://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/...ngdoms-Summary

D&D> Pre 1e White Box Edition, 1e, 2e, 3.5 Currently, Set in the World of Greyhawk (The first, longest running and Best Campaign Setting)
Software>Extensive use of all forms of MS Products, Visual Studio 2012, DAZ 3d, AutoCAD, Adobe Products.
Gaming Specific>Campaign Cartographer, D20 Pro Alpha & BattleGrounds Beta Tester, World Builder, Dungeon Crafter, LWD Hero Lab, Realm Works, Inkwell Ideas Citybuilder & Dungeon Builder, Auto-Realm, Dundjinni
Contributing Writer for TSR, WOC, & Canonfire
Dark Lord Galen is offline   #17 Reply With Quote
kbs666
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,690

Old July 20th, 2018, 07:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Lord Galen View Post
Spot on Erin... EXCEPT above... they tried on more than one occasion to eliminate competition via that... it was tossed, and not derivative....
Tunnels & Trolls in late 70s was first that came to my mind and was attacked by then TSR, and later again by WOC in 2005.

Gygax Magazine (yea that Gygax) was a periodical in similar form to Dragon Magazine and again was attacked via WOC/Hazbro, and again tossed as not related to the IP they held over World of Greyhawk (something I keep up with in detail). And after personally speaking with Luke Gygax on this, the basis of claim ironically was the very name itself. The court ruled that a man has the right to his own name was the basis of dismissal. Unfortunately in this particular case, it ended up quagmired in an internal family battle and died.

And lastly...
Mazes & Monsters, which by any standard was a blatant aim at D&D... and any growing up in the late 70s / early 80s will tell you an impact on the game... but again tossed not once but twice since they (as you note in your post above) were not RPGs but a Novel & made for TV Movie....
The follow up book "The Dungeon Master" couldn't get any bolder at "re-use" of a name...
And while WOC could continue filing suits... at some point they reach the law of diminishing return... I suppose....

DLG
The sad thing about that is after Gary's ex wife sold TSR to the Dille Family Trust, the people who own the Buck rogers IP, and Gary was forced out of the company he wrote a new RPG called Dangerous Journeys: Mythus which was quite good even if it has some undeniable flaws. In particular the magic system was far ahead of its time. But Lorraine Williams, head of the Dille Trust and at the time Ceo or some such of TSR, sued Gary over the game claiming it was too close to D&D even though it wasn't. It drained Gary of cash and kept him from releasing product until he finally had to settle and the settlement included turning over rights to the game to TSR who promptly shelved it to never see the light of day again simply out of spite since it is well known Lorraine hated the hippy Gary.

my Realm Works videos
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZU...4DwXXkvmBXQ9Yw
kbs666 is offline   #18 Reply With Quote
Dark Lord Galen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707

Old July 20th, 2018, 10:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbs666 View Post
....... Dangerous Journeys.......which was quite good even if it has some undeniable flaws. In particular the magic system was far ahead of its time. But Lorraine Williams, .......... at the time Ceo or some such of TSR, sued Gary over the game claiming it was too close to D&D even though it wasn't. ..........he finally had to settle and the settlement included turning over rights to the game to TSR who promptly shelved it to never see the light of day again simply out of spite since it is well known Lorraine hated the hippy Gary.
Yep.. Dangerous Journeys had great possibilities, and was one of several that got shelved because of lawsuits you speak of....And worst of all, Lorraine / Bloom TSR took no account to the end user base....Thinking only of what they thought best, and now how the industry could grow as a whole (a rising tide raises all boats). Soon to follow TSR became a "partnership (lol funny every time I think of that) with a card game that knew nothing about RPG and its users... Only to later be "absorbed and forgotten.. thus is Lorraine's legacy...

My beloved Greyhawk suffers a similar fate at the hand of Hazbro by proxy to Lorraine's shortsightedness.. even when a group of us tried to outright purchase the IP..... they would rather let it sit collecting dust and cannibalizing its corpse by repurposing pieces and shoe-horning them into Forgotten Realms where they NEVER WHERE...... huff huff..GURRREE HOWLLLLL. now you did it KB... you inadvertently awoke the beast known as the disdain of Lorraine and WOC... MAWAAHHAAAHAHA...
Back... Back in the cage of despair you beast!....

The only words I would say are certainly not fit for the "younglings here" hehe BJ would be sending me a nasty note even though I'd be right.....

Suffice to say... In the interests of trying to be the only company to offer RGP... they forgot the endproduct user will have the last say...

And now all these years Later, My friends Eric Mona, Wolfgang Baur, Monty Cook, Gary Holan, Anna Meyer and many others are being recognized as industry leaders in spite of the past (and present) shortsighted bureaucracy. Why, because they listened to the people who use the products.

DLG

D&D> Pre 1e White Box Edition, 1e, 2e, 3.5 Currently, Set in the World of Greyhawk (The first, longest running and Best Campaign Setting)
Software>Extensive use of all forms of MS Products, Visual Studio 2012, DAZ 3d, AutoCAD, Adobe Products.
Gaming Specific>Campaign Cartographer, D20 Pro Alpha & BattleGrounds Beta Tester, World Builder, Dungeon Crafter, LWD Hero Lab, Realm Works, Inkwell Ideas Citybuilder & Dungeon Builder, Auto-Realm, Dundjinni
Contributing Writer for TSR, WOC, & Canonfire
Dark Lord Galen is offline   #19 Reply With Quote
Dark Lord Galen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 707

Old July 20th, 2018, 10:59 AM
So to get the thread Semi- back on track... for any looking for back history of the original works of MANY of the "NEW" forgotten Realms published materials (and many more "Stolen" pieces to come) one only has to look as far as The World of Greyhawk.... and change the names to protect the ignorant.... because WOC/Hazbro hopes you don't notice the regurgitation...


DLG

D&D> Pre 1e White Box Edition, 1e, 2e, 3.5 Currently, Set in the World of Greyhawk (The first, longest running and Best Campaign Setting)
Software>Extensive use of all forms of MS Products, Visual Studio 2012, DAZ 3d, AutoCAD, Adobe Products.
Gaming Specific>Campaign Cartographer, D20 Pro Alpha & BattleGrounds Beta Tester, World Builder, Dungeon Crafter, LWD Hero Lab, Realm Works, Inkwell Ideas Citybuilder & Dungeon Builder, Auto-Realm, Dundjinni
Contributing Writer for TSR, WOC, & Canonfire
Dark Lord Galen is offline   #20 Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
wolflair.com copyright ©1998-2016 Lone Wolf Development, Inc. View our Privacy Policy here.