Lone Wolf Development Forums  

Go Back   Lone Wolf Development Forums > Realm Works Forums > Realm Works Discussion

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
daplunk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 2,256

Old March 11th, 2016, 03:14 PM
I don't suppose there's a way to increase the size limit on images to 50.2MB to be precise.

Just so we can load in the amazing Faerun map by Mike Schley

The Maps

Edit: It really wouldn't matter as the app is struggling to work with large pictures. Resizing the picture now.

Last edited by daplunk; March 11th, 2016 at 03:18 PM.
daplunk is offline   #1 Reply With Quote
MNBlockHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Twin Cities Area, MN, USA
Posts: 1,321

Old March 11th, 2016, 09:06 PM
Love Mike Scley's work. I just bought all the Curse of Straud maps so I can make battle maps and print on a plotter printer. I think its great that WoTC commissioned the work such that Mike retains a license to sell reproductions and I hope Mikes makes as much or more money this way than if he charged WoTC more and sold the art outright.

RW Project: Dungeons & Dragons 5th edition homebrew world
Other Tools: CampaignCartographer, Cityographer, Dungeonographer, Evernote
MNBlockHead is offline   #2 Reply With Quote
rob
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232

Old March 16th, 2016, 04:25 AM
There is very little practical value in a huge, high-resolution map for showing on your SCREEN. Your screen is 96dpi, and the high-resolution map is so you can PRINT it with high quality. So you'll get excellent results by simply converting the image to 100dpi (or 96dpi). You can also carve the big image up into smaller pieces (i.e. regions) that may make sense to keep at higher resolutions than 100dpi. You can then use the smaller pieces as "zoomed in" maps for specific regions.

Hope this helps!
rob is offline   #3 Reply With Quote
Dervish
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Grand Forks ND
Posts: 128

Old March 16th, 2016, 09:25 AM
Rob are you seriously going to look a publisher like WotC or Paizo in the face and tell them no high res maps or images and expect them to sell their product on your market place?
Dervish is offline   #4 Reply With Quote
AEIOU
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,147

Old March 16th, 2016, 10:07 AM
They cannot be printed from RW, so there is no impact on using slightly lower resolution images.

As a user, I would look publishers in the eye and say that my use at the table requires quick access and reasonable load times.

I would think publishers would expect PDF-sized images for modules which are well under the threshold. As for campaign material and high-res world maps, I would think they'd prefer that all their users can access reasonably (because pins will add complexity and probably affect load times) rather than a small number being able to view maps with highest resolutions.

I keep a high res version of all maps outside of RW so that I can print and manipulate. It's a pain to have to maintain multiple files rather than use RW as my repository. But the inability to print or export makes that non-viable at this time.

You could probably also attach the full res version as a file rather than a graphic image. With this method, when you opened the file it would launch an outside graphics viewer/editor and you would bypass the RW display limits. Not ideal, but it may meet your needs.
AEIOU is offline   #5 Reply With Quote
MNBlockHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Twin Cities Area, MN, USA
Posts: 1,321

Old March 17th, 2016, 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEIOU View Post
You could probably also attach the full res version as a file rather than a graphic image. With this method, when you opened the file it would launch an outside graphics viewer/editor and you would bypass the RW display limits. Not ideal, but it may meet your needs.
This.

What I would hope/expect is that the smart maps and images would be screen optimized for player view.

But I would also hope that hi-res version of the maps would be available for people like me who still like to print out battlemaps on my plotter printer for moving minis. I hi-res also lets you manipulate the image for your preferred VTT (I would assume that most VTTs most downsample huge images, but I have limited experience with the VTTs).

RW Project: Dungeons & Dragons 5th edition homebrew world
Other Tools: CampaignCartographer, Cityographer, Dungeonographer, Evernote
MNBlockHead is offline   #6 Reply With Quote
Dunkin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 13

Old March 17th, 2016, 08:57 PM
A suggestion: You can retain your high resolution map and probably use it in Realm Works at full size if you save a copy as a .jpeg format at 65% image quality. You will not lose much detail at all (especially at that resolution) and it will end up being 1/4 of the file size (if not more). You will need photoshop (or similar image editing software) to accomplish this, however.

Last edited by Dunkin; March 17th, 2016 at 10:49 PM.
Dunkin is offline   #7 Reply With Quote
tomponzi
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 28

Old March 18th, 2016, 02:48 AM
I would really love to have someone give me a little more detail on how I can change the the images I find on the web.

In my case I am using the wonderful Greyhawk maps that have been made by Anna Meyer. There are a number of maps I would love to use that are far below Realmworks file the size limit, but exceed the pixel limit.

I know close to nothing about image files, but am I correct in assuming that when Dunkin suggests changing the resolution this would not impact the pixel limit?

Any advice would be appreciated.
tomponzi is offline   #8 Reply With Quote
davidp
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,090

Old March 18th, 2016, 06:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomponzi View Post
I know close to nothing about image files, but am I correct in assuming that when Dunkin suggests changing the resolution this would not impact the pixel limit?
This is correct. Basically, when the image is used in Realm Works in memory, it has to expand out to an uncompressed bitmap for display and for applying what has been revealed. When it is uncompressed, the memory footprint will be on the order of 4 bytes per pixel. So if you have an image that is 4096 x 4096 pixels, it uses up 64 MB of memory just for the image data. But then when you have the reveal mask applied on that, a new image is needed with that in place that is another 64 MB. And, as you may notice, player view doesn't immediately update as you make changes, until you press save. This is accomplished by having another copy of the image for player view. So for one image shown in player view and being edited in a tab, you would be using 3 x 64 MB to store the data. If you have several images like this, memory usage adds up quickly.

For image format, a lot depends on what kind of image. For many maps, they won't have a lot of colors and so PNG file format can often be smaller than JPG, unless you lower the quality a lot on the JPG. And an advantage of PNG is that it doesn't throw out image data like JPG does. What you may find useful when considering file format is to save in several different formats and see what works best for your needs. Using a program such as Paint.NET (which is free), you can convert to other formats easily.
davidp is offline   #9 Reply With Quote
Dunkin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 13

Old March 19th, 2016, 02:15 AM
Good info. to know, David. Thanks. I wasn't aware the RW converts it to an uncompressed bitmap when loaded in memory. Nor was I aware that there we a pixel limit. What is the resolution limit for an image in RW, by the way?
Dunkin is offline   #10 Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
wolflair.com copyright ©1998-2016 Lone Wolf Development, Inc. View our Privacy Policy here.