Feature request

[deathlynx]

I moved this portion of another thread to keep them from getting too confused in the long run...

Originally Posted by rob

OK, I think I'm now starting to grok what you have in mind. Please note that your previous descriptions lacked any substantive explanations, so we were left to guess what you were thinking. Your latest post offers some insight into what you're envisioning, so now we can start to understand.

sorry...I'd described the situation initially but was confused over the profile aspect...Adding the member expression to the ruleset probably would be the best way to go about what I'm thinking unless there's a way to put it into the tag definitions...Personally I think putting it in the tag might be more universally useful as it would allow authors to, for example, exclude a particular unit type from anything (including race/roster although I can't imagine why someone would want to) and not just based on rulesets...But for my specific case it's just a case of rulesets excluding certain composition groups (tags)...

*IF* I'm understanding correctly, what you're asking for is effectively ruleset-based control over membership.
. . .
If so, the next question becomes "how useful is it?", which is influenced by the answer to "how many other authors would also find this to be valuable?". We can explore that next, assuming I'm on the right track here.

Yup, for my specific case...Although I'd imagine there might be other more global areas where exclusion groups could be useful...