Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
thanks for this it worked great |
|
#21 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
minimum(ranger5+feat4, 8) = Effective Ranger Level 8 Effective Ranger Level 8 - 3 (Rangers calculate at -3) = 5 Look, I'm allowing for your RAW interpretation, I just don't agree with you that your interpretation is the correct RAW interpretation. I also don't agree it is what HL should do, and besides this whole discussion belongs on a paizo.com thread. This doesn't even get to another problem with your interpretation that has been shot down on Paizo boards, that a single class Ranger taking that feat with your RAW would be at full progression. So a 20th level Ranger with that feat using your RAW would be 20th AC but with my RAW (and the one HL shares) would be correct (according to Paizo) at 17th AC. Last edited by risner; December 7th, 2010 at 11:57 AM. |
|
#22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 17
|
lets agree to disagree then I got the fix for my interpretation so it works
|
#23 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,245
|
Rules fight! Hey everybody come-on, tc7 and risner are gonna have a rules fight! Yeah Yeah, you get em! You.... damn... too late.
|
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,265
|
I have to agree with Risner on this one. The Class you are using to get the Animal companion is calculated on that level only regardless of other classes that grant AC's. Otherwise the text would read character level not class level!
|
#25 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
Option A: Apply the -3 first then add the +4 and limit the result by character level. (5-3+4)<=8 Option B: Apply the +4 first, limit by character level then apply the -3. (5+4)<=8-3 |
|
#26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,265
|
Quote:
In order:- B.o.D.M.a.S Brackets over Division, Multiplication, Addition and Subtraction. Addition first then subtraction! 5+4-3 = 6 So the Ranger class is three levels lower for the calculation which would be the brackets part, (5-3)+4 = 6 Second result is the same as first but is mathematically correct in equation order. However R.A.W. state the feat adds 4 to the Class level limited by total character level, in this case 8th so the correct equation should be this. Where x equals the difference in character level to the sum of the first part of the equation. 5 + 4 = 9 (Ranger level plus feat bonus) 9 - 8 = 1 <- this is x (Ranger plus feat limited by character level) ((5+4) - x)-3) = 5 final result to calculate AC HD Last edited by bodrin; December 8th, 2010 at 12:25 AM. Reason: Clarification of equation rule! |
|
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jonesboro, AR (USA)
Posts: 858
|
Try looking at it this way:
The feat isn't meant to be a 'workaround' for the Ranger Level -3 limit on Animal Companions. It's meant to offset the 'penalty' to Animal Companion power incurred by multi-classing (much like the Magical Knack trait for spellcasters). It makes your Ranger level up to four levels higher (to the limit of your HD). So a Ranger 5/Whatever 3 multiclass counts as an 8th level Ranger for purposes of his Animal Companion. 8-3 is 5, so he could have an Animal Companion equal to that of a 5th level Druid. That's why the description specifically says 'Class Level' rather than 'Character Level.' |
#28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,265
|
|
#29 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
http://paizo.com/paizo/messageboards...Feats&page=1#4 |
|
#30 |
|
|