Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232
|
Yes, I realize it has been two weeks since you posted this. Unfortunately,
we've been operating with half our staff on vacation for much of the past two weeks (I know, not incredibly smart). And we've been striving to get a preliminary V1.2 into Beta testing by the end of Thursday. So things have been a bit hectic, to say the least. :-) From your descriptions, I believe that everything can be supported by CV. I'll try to address each item you bring up. Please ask further questions if things aren't entirely clear. Quick note before I start: There are some rule parsing problems within V1.1 that may make some of the following difficult to accomplish. V1.2 should eliminate those issues. If you'd like, I'll add you to the Beta team so you can work with the V1.2 Beta and help us to verify everything is working smoothly. 1. The number of cards in the deck can be limited using the "#" special term within a card scoping rule. You can compare the count of the card against the total number of cards in teh deck, which is given by the "$" special term. 2. The maximum of two races can be achieved with a "race" tag group and a rule that limits the number of distinct races to two (via the "distinct" special term). 3. The Generic race requirement can be enforced via a rule that first verifies two races are used (see #2) and then verifies that the Generic race is present by checking for the tag. 4. To handle the different personality versions, you can assign each such card a common tag (e.g. all Londo cards get a "Londo" tag). Then you can write rules that verify the limits on those common tags. 5. Reserve card restrictions #1 and #2 are easily verified with tags. 6. Reserve card restriction #3 can be handled the same way as outlined in #1 above. 7. Reserve restriction #4 doesn't make sense to me. The examples you give don't seem to map to the rule you state, so I'm confused. Could you please explain this in more detail for me? 8. Ensuring that the user omits at least one race from the Reserve can be easily accomplished by getting the total number of distinct races in the Reserve (via "distinct") and making sure it is at least one less than the total number of races. I think that covers everything. If you need more details on anything, let me know and I'll try to explain further. Hope this helps, Rob At 01:00 AM 5/7/2003 +0100, you wrote: >Is anyone out there even passingly familiar with the Babylon 5 Component >Game System? > > >I now have a large chunk of the data file composed and I'm beginning to >look at validation. > >In B5:CGS the number of copies of any card permitted in a deck is >controlled by the size of the deck: > >10-19 = 1 copy >20-29 = 2 copies >30-39 = 3 copies >etc... > >Minimum deck size is 10. > >Each deck may contain a maximum of two Races. > >If two Races are used, one of them MUST be "Generic". > >Different versions of a personality count as the same card for duplication >purposes (eg. a copy of "Londo 2258" and a copy of "Londo 2259" are >considered to be 2 copies of "Londo"). > > > >The rules for the Reserve are less than clear. Effectively, your Reserve >automatically consists of every non-Generic card you own that does not >match the (other) Race chosen for your main deck. However, the cards that >may actually be used from your Reserve appear to be limited to 1 for every >10 cards in your deck. > >Effectively the restrictions on Reserve cards are: > 1) Not Generic > 2) Not of the same Race as any card in your deck. > 3) Number of copies of any card limited to 1 card for every 10 in > the main >deck. > 4) Number of cards limited to 1 card for every 10 in the main deck >SQUARED. > (eg. Maximum = 1 copy of 1 card, 2 copies of 2 cards, 3 copies > of 3 >cards) > >Whilst it is not compulsory to include any Non-Generic cards in your main >deck you must omit at least one other Race from your Reserve. (You ARE >considered to be playing one Race even if you do not use any of that Race's >cards) > >Essentially, I am here using Card Vault to determine the Reserve cards that >a player prefers (as technically their Reserve is almost unlimited) or >perhaps more usefully, to validate an actual deck in retrospect. > > > > >Any ideas how I go about setting all this up? > >---Steven > > >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >cardvault-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995 Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/aM1XQD/od7...tFAA/WuQolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
...7. Reserve restriction #4 doesn't make sense to me. The examples you
give don't seem to map to the rule you state, so I'm confused. Could you please explain this in more detail for me?... ...4) Number of cards limited to 1 card for every 10 in the main deck SQUARED. (eg. Maximum = 1 copy of 1 card, 2 copies of 2 cards, 3 copies of 3 cards)... I think perhaps the confusion is that it's not an additional restriction. If you validate correctly the number of NAMES and number of COPIES of those names, the maximum number of cards should take care of itself. Anyhow... The maximum size of the Reserve increases exponentially with the size of the Deck. Deck Size = 10-19, Reserve Limit = 1 Deck Size = 20-29, Reserve Limit = 4 Deck Size = 30-39, Reserve Limit = 9 Assume that you main deck is 20 cards and that you are using HUMAN and GENERIC cards. The number of DIFFERENT Non-HUMAN cards you are permitted = 2 (as Deck size = 20 to 29) The number of copies of ANY card you are permitted = 2 (same reason) Therefore the MAXIMUM number of Non-HUMAN cards you are permitted = 4 (2 copies each of 2 different cards) If your deck size is 30 to 39, the maximum number of Non-Human cards becomes 9 (3x3). Therefore, the MAXIMUM number of "other empire" cards you are permitted is always the square of the number of DIFFERENT "other empire" cards you are permitted... and NONE of them count towards the total size of your deck. Now whether any of that is actually relevant or necessary with all the other checks and balances is another question. It's one of those things that might be useful to know when writing the validation rules. I think the main reason for including it is that when you read the Reserve rules in isolation it easy to make the mistake that the limit is only 1,2,3... when it is actually 1,4,9... I've almost finished adding the card data, so with a bit of luck I'll be tackling the validation rules sometime next week. AND I found another restriction, although it doesn't look particularly complex: no more than 50% of any one TYPE (eg. Event). ---Steven ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/aM1XQD/od7...tFAA/WuQolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#2 |
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232
|
OK, this makes more sense now. You can accomplish the deck size limits via
the modulo operator and doing a manual squaring (i.e. x*x). The calculations you outline can be accomplished within CV, so I think you're good to go. And the new restriction you mention should be trivial. I assume you'll have a tag group for all the different card types. So it will be easy to identify all cards with the tag "type.event" and calculate the ratio to the total number of cards. Thanks, Rob At 10:12 PM 5/22/2003 +0100, you wrote: >...7. Reserve restriction #4 doesn't make sense to me. The examples you >give don't seem to map to the rule you state, so I'm confused. Could you >please explain this in more detail for me?... > >...4) Number of cards limited to 1 card for every 10 in the main deck >SQUARED. (eg. Maximum = 1 copy of 1 card, 2 copies of 2 cards, 3 copies of >3 cards)... > > >I think perhaps the confusion is that it's not an additional restriction. >If you validate correctly the number of NAMES and number of COPIES of those >names, the maximum number of cards should take care of itself. > > >Anyhow... > >The maximum size of the Reserve increases exponentially with the size of >the Deck. > >Deck Size = 10-19, Reserve Limit = 1 >Deck Size = 20-29, Reserve Limit = 4 >Deck Size = 30-39, Reserve Limit = 9 > > >Assume that you main deck is 20 cards and that you are using HUMAN and >GENERIC cards. > >The number of DIFFERENT Non-HUMAN cards you are permitted = 2 >(as Deck size = 20 to 29) > >The number of copies of ANY card you are permitted = 2 >(same reason) > >Therefore the MAXIMUM number of Non-HUMAN cards you are permitted = 4 >(2 copies each of 2 different cards) > > >If your deck size is 30 to 39, the maximum number of Non-Human cards >becomes 9 (3x3). Therefore, the MAXIMUM number of "other empire" cards you >are permitted is always the square of the number of DIFFERENT "other >empire" cards you are permitted... and NONE of them count towards the total >size of your deck. > > >Now whether any of that is actually relevant or necessary with all the >other checks and balances is another question. It's one of those things >that might be useful to know when writing the validation rules. I think the >main reason for including it is that when you read the Reserve rules in >isolation it easy to make the mistake that the limit is only 1,2,3... when >it is actually 1,4,9... > > > >I've almost finished adding the card data, so with a bit of luck I'll be >tackling the validation rules sometime next week. > > > >AND I found another restriction, although it doesn't look particularly >complex: no more than 50% of any one TYPE (eg. Event). > >---Steven --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rob Bowes (rob@wolflair.com) (559) 658-6995 Lone Wolf Development www.wolflair.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7...tFAA/WuQolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
#3 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Deck Sets. | jim at timewarpcomics.com | Card Vault | 0 | October 24th, 2003 08:03 PM |
Deck Sets. | emperor799 at bellsouth.n | Card Vault | 1 | September 23rd, 2003 12:50 PM |
B5CGS Deck validation. | exegamer at plansofmice.c | Card Vault | 0 | May 6th, 2003 04:21 PM |
SCC Lion Deck | emperor799 at earthlink.n | Card Vault | 0 | January 24th, 2003 09:37 AM |