|
View Poll Results: Which game systems would you most like to see supported by Hero Lab? | |||
RIFTS | 75 | 21.01% | |
Rogue Trader | 84 | 23.53% | |
Scion | 63 | 17.65% | |
Shadowrun | 138 | 38.66% | |
Song of Ice & Fire | 54 | 15.13% | |
True20 | 46 | 12.89% | |
UniSystem (Buffy & Conspiracy X RPG) | 40 | 11.20% | |
Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay | 78 | 21.85% | |
WoD: Hunter | 71 | 19.89% | |
WoD: Mage | 89 | 24.93% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 357. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 9
|
Rifts is the perfect system for Herolab. Character creation is the longest part of the game. If you guys have it all in herolab, that'll be the easiest part. I know I'd pay for that system.
|
#81 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
|
Rogue Trader
please I would love it if you supported this game DnD 4e 40K Dystopian Wars Rogue Trader http://plansofdiceandmen.blogspot.com.au/ |
#82 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 35
|
I've seen comments on SW D6, and Cthonian Stars for Traveller among others...
While the "D6 System" is now under the 3rd ed OGL (releasing it for use by anyone) the SW version - mainly the SW material is (c) Lucasfilm and as has been stated probably prohibitively expensive. Cthonian Stars is done under the Mongoose Traveller OGL (same 3rd ed license again) BUT not all the material in it is itself under the MGT OGL. |
#83 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 23
|
I'd love to see Star Wars Edge of the Empire supported in the Future!!
|
#84 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
|
I'd love to see All Flesh Must Be Eaten and Witchcraft supported in HL. Both are Classic Unisystem and have compatible rules. Cinematic Unisystem games like Buffy and Angel would be nice too.
The good thing from a development perspective is that AFMBE core rules and suppliments differ really only in equipment and qualities. And the character creation seems fairly light. I suspect it would be a much easier effort to develop than some other systems. fingers crossed, Glenn |
#85 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 874
|
I've been looking at the new editions of RuneQuest, and having support for that would be very nice.
|
#86 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Independence, Mo
Posts: 797
|
I would love to see the sixth edition of RuneQuest done also.
|
#87 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 16
|
Write in vote "Unknown Armies".
|
#88 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 11
|
I would like to see Palladium system on hero lab (it's the game I play most), as well as the general d20 rules so I could make my own d20 game or easily transfer a d20 game not supported by Hero Lab yet.
|
#89 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: great falls, MT
Posts: 6
|
I would love to see palladium's game system supported by you guys. I am sure they would gladly make some kind of royalties based marketing deal. Kevin is always receptive to new Ideas to support business and players. I play mostly Robotech but the character creation is a beast. I love hero lab and have supported it since i could with pathfinder. I have used army builder for longer than I can remember. Paying for this game support is a no question for me. PLZ consider it. I know it would be a lot of work but if it happens I know I and my gamers (who all play with hero lab instead of character sheets in pathfinder) would purchase and put up shout outs for your product and its usefullness on palladium forums (if we can) just because of how complicated character stuff is and how easy this could make it to attract new players (my other half thinks it is too much to play and would play if she could use her hero lab).
May the Killer Rabbit, eternal servant of chaos, always prevail! |
#90 |
|
|