Lone Wolf Development Forums  

Go Back   Lone Wolf Development Forums > Hero Lab Forums > HL - Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
Register FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
charlieluce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,321

Old April 9th, 2016, 08:30 PM
The new Spellbook system appears to assume that a Wizard or Arcanist only starts with the Cantrips that appear in Core, and must pay or take as their free level-up spells any other 0-level spells. Can someone point me to an official Paizo ruling to this effect? I've never encountered anyone whose game made that assumption (though I've never done any Pathfinder Society play).

I've reported this as a bug, because at the very least I'd like a House Rule setting that overrides this.

Currently Running: Pathfinder Second Edition
Currently Playing:
Pathfinder First Edition, Star Trek Adventures
Former HL Games: D&D 4e & 5e, Mutants & Masterminds 2E & 3E, Savage Worlds
charlieluce is offline   #1 Reply With Quote
Mathias
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,213

Old April 10th, 2016, 07:59 AM
Read the rules in the Ultimate Magic web extra pdf that these spells came from. Also, this has been the way HL has handled those spells since Ultimate Magic was released - only core o-level spells are automatically added to spellbooks.

If your GM says otherwise, use the "Buy for free" checkbox when adding them.
Mathias is offline   #2 Reply With Quote
charlieluce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,321

Old April 10th, 2016, 08:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathias View Post
Read the rules in the Ultimate Magic web extra pdf that these spells came from.
Link? All I can find on the Paizo site is a suggestion that "Core Only" could be used as a House Rule.

Quote:
If your GM says otherwise, use the "Buy for free" checkbox when adding them.
That still doesn't list them properly under Free Spells. Is this something that I can fix in the editor without a ridiculous amount of trouble? Is it something I can turn off?

Currently Running: Pathfinder Second Edition
Currently Playing:
Pathfinder First Edition, Star Trek Adventures
Former HL Games: D&D 4e & 5e, Mutants & Masterminds 2E & 3E, Savage Worlds
charlieluce is offline   #3 Reply With Quote
Mathias
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,213

Old April 10th, 2016, 09:02 AM
What's wrong with seeing them in the other spell list in the spellbook?
Mathias is offline   #4 Reply With Quote
Mathias
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,213

Old April 10th, 2016, 09:11 AM
http://paizo.com/paizo/blog/v5748dyo...imate-Cantrips
Mathias is offline   #5 Reply With Quote
charlieluce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,321

Old April 10th, 2016, 09:16 AM
Thank you for the link. I still want a way to implement a House Rule that isn't awkward or clunky-looking. This is going to affect every spellbook using PC and NPC in our games.

Currently Running: Pathfinder Second Edition
Currently Playing:
Pathfinder First Edition, Star Trek Adventures
Former HL Games: D&D 4e & 5e, Mutants & Masterminds 2E & 3E, Savage Worlds

Last edited by charlieluce; April 10th, 2016 at 09:20 AM.
charlieluce is offline   #6 Reply With Quote
LazarX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jersey City
Posts: 326

Old April 11th, 2016, 08:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlieluce View Post
Thank you for the link. I still want a way to implement a House Rule that isn't awkward or clunky-looking. This is going to affect every spellbook using PC and NPC in our games.
This got thoroughly discussed in PFS play and that's the PFS rule in Additional Resources. Only CRB cantrips are automatically included. (And remember that cantrips in your opposition schools take up TWO slots to prepare.)

It works the other way around as well. If your PC successfully researches a new cantrip, it doesn't magically pop up in every other wizard's book.
LazarX is offline   #7 Reply With Quote
charlieluce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,321

Old April 11th, 2016, 09:19 AM
Okay, I get that the vast majority of non-PFS games are Doing It Wrong (believe me, I spent a lot of time searching through forums on the subject). It's still apparently an extremely common House Rule, and I'd like to see support for it - I outlined an approach in my Spell Costs topic that I think would work for everyone and would not be disruptive to implement.

Currently Running: Pathfinder Second Edition
Currently Playing:
Pathfinder First Edition, Star Trek Adventures
Former HL Games: D&D 4e & 5e, Mutants & Masterminds 2E & 3E, Savage Worlds
charlieluce is offline   #8 Reply With Quote
Colen
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,690

Old April 11th, 2016, 10:19 AM
Adding *all* the level 0 spells to a hero's spellbook isn't something we want to do at the moment, because adding having all those spells on every character would use a lot of extra memory - even if you weren't using them, they're still there in the background, taking up space.

Not only that, with some of the addons we have - for example, 1001 spells - adding *all* the spells would mean you had over 100 spells in your starting spell list, which we think is a few too many.

If it's something you want for your campaign, you have two options:

1) As Mathias suggests, add the level 0 spells you want "for free" to the spellbook
2) In the editor, create an adjustment that bootstraps the level 0 spells you want with the Helper.WizBoot tag (or equivalent other tag) and then add it to the hero.

With either of these options, you can get the spells you want to make legal for your campaign.
Colen is offline   #9 Reply With Quote
charlieluce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,321

Old April 11th, 2016, 01:09 PM
I'm seriously considering adopting a House Rule that spellbook casters get their casting stat in 0-level spells of their choice (subject to any DM rulings) in their initial spellbook, though I'm afraid that it would be a terror to try and implement in Hero Lab.

Currently Running: Pathfinder Second Edition
Currently Playing:
Pathfinder First Edition, Star Trek Adventures
Former HL Games: D&D 4e & 5e, Mutants & Masterminds 2E & 3E, Savage Worlds
charlieluce is offline   #10 Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
wolflair.com copyright ©1998-2016 Lone Wolf Development, Inc. View our Privacy Policy here.