Lone Wolf Development Forums  

Go Back   Lone Wolf Development Forums > Army Builder Forums > Army Builder
Register FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
robertal at campbellhall.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old January 5th, 2003, 12:06 PM
Hi,
I hope this is the right place to note this sort of thing. I've
noticed that there is a small omission on the Imperial Guard list
com-linnk wargear. The army builder file notes the following.

"If the command hq has a comm-link, one squad per turn that also has a
comm-link can, at any time, use the hw's leadership instead of its own."

However, the wargear description from the book notes the following.

Pg 8

"If a commmand HQ or command section has a comm-link, then one squad per
turn that also has a comm-link may use the leadership value of the
officer, no matter where on the battlefield they are located."

I know it may seem like a minor distinction, but it is actually
important, as it allows command section to provide leadership as well as
the command hq outside of 12". It's not really a huge deal for those
who have a codex, but if the kind fellow who does the warhammer 40k file
updates could correct it whenever there's a free opportunity that would
be awesome for those who don't check against the book. Thanks!

Best Regards,
Alex

To unsubscribe from this group, email

armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  #1 Reply With Quote
jimi at tubman.fsbusiness
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old January 5th, 2003, 12:13 PM
> It's not really a huge deal for those who have a codex,

Which is what you should be doing anyway.


Jimi



To unsubscribe from this group, email

armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  #2 Reply With Quote
imhotepthearchitect at ya
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Old January 5th, 2003, 12:14 PM
The datafiles were never meant to replace the need for a codex, and are vaguely worded in many areas intentionally for that effect. We do not wish to have our work construed as an attempt to assists people in playing 40k without purschasing the proper codex for their army.
Cheers,

Alex Roberts <robertal@campbellhall.org> wrote:It's not really a huge deal for those who have a codex, but if the kind fellow who does the warhammer 40k file updates could correct it whenever there's a free opportunity that would be awesome for those who don't check against the book. Thanks!


--
Graham H. Tracey (40k3 Maintainer)
If we can't fix it, then it ain't broke!
40k3 Datafile Support Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ab-40k3
40k3 Datafiles Bug Tracker: http://bugtrack.lscfn.ca





---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


To unsubscribe from this group, email

armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
  #3 Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imperial guard Command HQ ingl0rius Warhammer 40,000 5 June 22nd, 2008 08:32 PM
Imperial Guard Spyrit Warhammer 40,000 1 December 28th, 2005 10:05 AM
Tallarn Imperial Guard MadBob Warhammer 40,000 0 August 9th, 2005 11:32 AM
Imperial Guard Illuminati01_ at hotmail. Army Builder 1 September 4th, 2003 01:50 AM
Imperial Guard Models kamodoii at yahoo.com Army Builder 1 August 4th, 2003 11:35 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
wolflair.com copyright ©1998-2016 Lone Wolf Development, Inc. View our Privacy Policy here.