|
View Poll Results: What Pathfinder Content Do You Want to See FIRST? | |||
Essential Pathfinder Rulebooks Only (e.g. CRB, APG, ACG, UM, UC) | 23 | 15.23% | |
All Pathfinder Rulebooks | 12 | 7.95% | |
Bestiaries and Similar Books | 6 | 3.97% | |
Modules and Smaller Adventures | 7 | 4.64% | |
Adventure Paths and Huge Adventures | 45 | 29.80% | |
Generally Reusable Content (e.g. NPCs, Artwork, Maps) | 4 | 2.65% | |
Golarian Campaign Setting | 10 | 6.62% | |
Player Companions | 0 | 0% | |
Not interested in Pathfinder content | 44 | 29.14% | |
Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8,232
|
We're going to be releasing an assortment of content for Realm Works when we launch the Content Market in December, with the initial focus being on adventures and other highly reusable material that can be dropped into numerous campaigns. A healthy portion of the content will be for Pathfinder, but not all of it. Beyond December, we'll continue to add more content for different game systems, with Pathfinder being prominent. This is just an informal poll to give us an idea of what aspects of the overall Pathfinder catalog you would find most desirable.
Note: This particular poll is exclusively targeted at Pathfinder GMs and players. If your interest lies with other game systems, please don't assume this means we're only going to be focusing on Pathfinder. We'll be supporting a variety of game systems. Pathfinder just happens to have a vast catalog, and we want to target our support effectively for the game. |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 195
|
I'm looking for the CRB, followed by the Strange Aeons AP.
However I selected the essential rule books first. |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Twin Cities Area, MN, USA
Posts: 1,325
|
Not interested in PF, but in general I think it is best to have the bestiaries/monster manuals first for linking purposes. I'm finding rules less important. They are nice to have in there for searching and looking up, but I'm finding linking to rules not so important.
RW Project: Dungeons & Dragons 5th edition homebrew world Other Tools: CampaignCartographer, Cityographer, Dungeonographer, Evernote |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 345
|
Deleted
Last edited by Pollution; February 17th, 2017 at 09:50 AM. |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 88
|
I would personally prefer Rise of the Rune Lords. I am planning on running it as soon as I can get Realm Works.
I wouldn't mind having the core books in there as well, but with so much of that being online now I don't see the need. Where as turning a Adventure Path into the structure of Realm Works is something we cant easily search through. I tend to think my main use of Realm Works is to plan out adventures, not look up rules. My 2 cents at least. |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 281
|
I personally voted for APs and Huge Adventures, but Modules and Smaller Adventures is a very close second for me.
While broader rulebooks would be great, and I am sure I will buy rulebooks and bestiaries eventually once they are available, I use Realm Works to manage adventures more than anything else. I have Hero Lab to wrangle monsters (and routinely attach portfolio files as RW snippets) and general rules are easy to look up online. My biggest time sink is entering the adventure content and if I could purchase a pre-structured version of the module or AP I plan to run, I would buy it in a heartbeat. |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 345
|
Deleted
Last edited by Pollution; February 17th, 2017 at 09:50 AM. |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,690
|
Personally I want the bestiaries first.
Presently my rules almanac is mostly monsters and what races/classes archetypes are allowed in the campaign. I really don't expect to ever want a lot of rules crunch in RW. For instance the allowed classes and archetypes is little more than a list and a reference to what source it appears in. I leave all the crunchy stuff to HL. |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Mississauga, ON, Canada
Posts: 103
|
I voted core rulebooks first.. bestiaries would be next followed by the AP (specifically Reign of Winter lol). I won't be starting the second book until the new year so there's hope still!
|
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 88
|
I think it is interesting how we all use Realm works differently.
I use Hero Lab for my monsters and encounters, then I load their files into Realm Works. I use Realm works for all the Story/Towns/NPC background/Lore/etc. Not the "rules". I don't think I would use Realm works to look up rules or monsters, I would just use the web, or Hero Lab. But Realm works works so much better than trying to scan through the huge book that is RotRLs. Looking up who runs the item shop in Sandport is a LOT harder without Realm Works than looking up the stats to a beast or Rules. I am not saying how other people use it is wrong, just kinda intrigued how many ways it can be used. Its a testament to how powerful it can be. |
#10 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|