Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3
|
Are you sure? I'm pretty certain I recall the choice being something like "For any Grey Knight, replace their Force Sword with a Force X" and then "Upgrade that force X to be Mastercrafted" not just on the Justicar.
|
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 278
|
The book is very explicit that only Justicars get to MC things in GKT squads. Possibly you are thinking of Paladin squads.
Click here to get 2.25GB of DropBox cloud storage free! I've always wondered about the first person that saw a lobster and said, "You know what? I'm going to eat that." |
#12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3
|
Ah, so it does - I stand corrected.
|
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2
|
For starts thank you very much for your time in creating the Grey Knights data files. Now a question/ comment. (I'm not trying to create trouble or be a butt head.) When you take Inquisitor Coteaz (Lord of Formosa special Rule) "Inquisitorial Henchmen warbands are Troop choices in an army that includes Inquisitor Torquemada Coteaz, and are not limited by the number of Inquisitors in your army." But under the Henchmen Warband entry it says "This unit does not take up a force organization slot." Why does it take up a troop slot in army builder? It doesn't say anywhere I could find that this rule is changed just because they are no longer Elite.
Again thanks for all your hard work I really do enjoy it. |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 278
|
It says that right after the line that tells you to take up to one per Inquisitor. I.E. That one unit taken per inquisitor doesn't take up a slot. If you aren't taking one per inquisitor, what does that sentence refer to? This is pretty basic English grammar and, I'm pretty sure, common to nearly every human language grammar that still exists.
Basically, please don't confuse line wrapping for either line breaks or, worse, paragraph breaks. Click here to get 2.25GB of DropBox cloud storage free! I've always wondered about the first person that saw a lobster and said, "You know what? I'm going to eat that." |
#15 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Author
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lebanon, PA, USA
Posts: 144
|
This has been discussed on our website HERE
I do agreed with Mr. Rose's interpretation here. This seems to be a debate because we have plenty of people who want their cake and eat it too. The strictest interpretation would be to limit it. That is for now until GW clears it up with a FAQ release. Fyrebyrd AB40k Beta Tester The only "hobby" GW is interested in is lining their pockets with your money. Last edited by fyrebyrd; May 10th, 2011 at 06:58 AM. |
#16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Castlemaine, Victoria
Posts: 17
|
This is my first post and firstly wishing to thank all the lone Wolf team for an outstanding job throughout the years.
My question is this. When a Codex is released then during the month embargo. If there is further rules or erratas released during this time do you incorporate this into the file or does the 30 day embargo on the erratas occur. Just wondering and please excuse any bad spelling as i am currently on om iphone. Would love to see a version of Army Builde3r on the iphone (mmmmmmmmmm). |
#17 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Author
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lebanon, PA, USA
Posts: 144
|
What probably would happen is that we would release the file as designed, without the FAQ/Errata. Then by next release or patch we would incorporate the FAQ/Errata.
Fyrebyrd AB40k Beta Tester The only "hobby" GW is interested in is lining their pockets with your money. |
#18 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Author
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 130
|
There isn't a 30 day embargo on errata/FAQ changes, but there will be a period of implementation and testing before release, so as Fyrebyrd says it would normally be incorporated with the next release.
Dan AB40k Site Admin http://www.ab40k.org - home of the AB40k maintainers |
#19 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|