Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 623
|
I have a 6th level Ranger/9th level Fighter with Boon Companion (Seeker) and Feat: Sable Company Marine (web enhancement.)
The feat says it requires Ranger 6th, which I am. When I take the Hippogriff on the Minion, it says it requires Druid. Edit: Nevermind, it comes in two parts. An Alternate Class option is required first. Edit 2: If you have the Boon Companion feat when you click the Animal Companion button that creates the companion, it errors with 4 errors (but otherwise appears to work): non-live child pick cAnimalComp from thing fBoonComp Eval #1 line 18 Last edited by risner; February 8th, 2011 at 08:46 AM. |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 62
|
Several of the Magus Arcana added for the Round 3 playtest are missing from the updated Magus class in HL. Also, the existing Magus Arcana still have their old text (referring to sacrificing prepared spells).
|
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 48
|
The item Murderer's Blackcloth has the wrong stats. It currently has +5 Armor class with a Max Dex of +4, but since it is a +1 Padded Armor it should be a +2 Armor class with a Max Dex of +8. Also, the Armor Check Penalty and the Spell Failure chance are both wrong. It should be - and 5% not -2 and 20%.
|
#13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
|
|
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 380
|
Furiuos Focus does not work yet
|
#15 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
You are right, I removed the feat and it is still happy with my Hippogriff companion. Sadly, this gets me back to "I have a free feat and I don't know what to do with it" for the Archer. There isn't a beneficial combat feat I can take, so maybe Toughness or something /shrug |
|
#16 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 623
|
Is that the "ignore PA penalty for first attack" thing?
I'm fairly sure they have said it is not implemented yet. As for why? It would be very difficult to implement. But it might be possible via an ugly hack. if PA is enabled and modifying all linkage[helper].tagnames[cAttack.?] I'm not sure whether or not the linkage has whether or not the weapon is the proper type? |
#17 |
Senior Member
Volunteer Data File Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 623
|
Piranha Strike from Sargava is reverse of Power Attack. (+6/-3 vs PA's -3/+6)
I thought this was reported before, but it might have been for Deadly Aim (which matches PA now.) |
#18 |
Senior Member
Lone Wolf Staff
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,213
|
Virtue, here is my response from the last time YOU posted about Furious Focus:
http://forums.wolflair.com/showpost....0&postcount=28 There is a search function on this forum. It is on the top right when you're looking at the list of threads. |
#19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sunny WA State
Posts: 141
|
The Phalanx Soldier is working for most shields with polearms or spears but not with tower shields. A tower shield is still a shield so it should be allowed to work per the Archetype rules IMO.
I did a search over at Paizo to see if there were any comments and there was no discussion by devs one way or the other that I could find. There were community comments stating that a tower shield is a shield and the Phalanx Soldier even gets bonuses to tower shields so they believe the intent is to include them. There is no text specifically excluding them like there is with a shield bash or under class proficiencies. Thanks in advance for looking at this. |
#20 |
|
|