Guest
Posts: n/a
|
To unsubscribe from this group, email
armybuilder-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are 3 messages in this issue. Topics in this digest: 1. 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error From: "Alex Roberts" <robertal@campbellhall.org> 2. Re: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk> 3. Re: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error From: ImhotepTheArchitect <imhotepthearchitect@yahoo.com> __________________________________________________ ______________________ __________________________________________________ ______________________ Message: 1 Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 12:35:38 -0800 From: "Alex Roberts" <robertal@campbellhall.org> Subject: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error Hi, I hope this is the right place to note this sort of thing. I've noticed that there is a small omission on the Imperial Guard list com-linnk wargear. The army builder file notes the following. "If the command hq has a comm-link, one squad per turn that also has a comm-link can, at any time, use the hw's leadership instead of its own." However, the wargear description from the book notes the following. Pg 8 "If a commmand HQ or command section has a comm-link, then one squad per turn that also has a comm-link may use the leadership value of the officer, no matter where on the battlefield they are located." I know it may seem like a minor distinction, but it is actually important, as it allows command section to provide leadership as well as the command hq outside of 12". It's not really a huge deal for those who have a codex, but if the kind fellow who does the warhammer 40k file updates could correct it whenever there's a free opportunity that would be awesome for those who don't check against the book. Thanks! Best Regards, Alex __________________________________________________ ______________________ __________________________________________________ ______________________ Message: 2 Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:18:11 -0000 From: "Jimi" <jimi@tubman.fsbusiness.co.uk> Subject: Re: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error > It's not really a huge deal for those who have a codex, Which is what you should be doing anyway. Jimi __________________________________________________ ______________________ __________________________________________________ ______________________ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 13:14:10 -0800 (PST) From: ImhotepTheArchitect <imhotepthearchitect@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: 40k Imperial Guard Wargear error The datafiles were never meant to replace the need for a codex, and are vaguely worded in many areas intentionally for that effect. We do not wish to have our work construed as an attempt to assists people in playing 40k without purschasing the proper codex for their army. Cheers, Alex Roberts <robertal@campbellhall.org> wrote:It's not really a huge deal for those who have a codex, but if the kind fellow who does the warhammer 40k file updates could correct it whenever there's a free opportunity that would be awesome for those who don't check against the book. Thanks! -- Graham H. Tracey (40k3 Maintainer) If we can't fix it, then it ain't broke! 40k3 Datafile Support Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ab-40k3 40k3 Datafiles Bug Tracker: http://bugtrack.lscfn.ca --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] __________________________________________________ ______________________ __________________________________________________ ______________________ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
#1 |
|
|