Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
|
|
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Campaign Cartographer is great software (no, it really is)...but it's "professional" type software. There are a million keyboard shortcuts, context menus, menu bars, buttons (which also have their own context menus), etc. The design isn't the least bit intuitive. If you want something that's easy, look elsewhere. If you're willing to put in the time, CC will make you some excellent maps. Further complicating matters, I got the triple-pack with city and dungeon builders too. It's just A LOT to take in...and that's coming from someone who likes learning new things. Last edited by JackOfAllGames; March 27th, 2014 at 08:49 AM. Reason: Clarity of subject - didn't want people to think I meant Realm Works |
|
#22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
|
|
#23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 4
|
I'm no fan of Campaign Cartographer.
Learn Photoshop or Gimp instead. You have more from it in the long run. CC is pricy and hard to learn, in that time you could learn much more stuff about the Gimp/Photoshop. And it is no secret that nearly all good/great mappers use Photoshop and not CC. |
#24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 865
|
Well, CC is not an art program. However, i wouldnt disagree that you can do more with photoshop, but actually if you're going to go that route, you can probably do more with illustrator.
Still, I dont think CC is as hard to use as people claim. In fact there are many "great mappers" that use both for different purposes. If you want to read more about both, I would suggest some of the forums in cartographersguild.com (which is not associated with any program) Last edited by mirtos; March 27th, 2014 at 07:12 PM. |
#25 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 15
|
I actually use both for my maps. CC has some good purposes and ease of use for things, as does Photoshop. I even know people that take maps from one and pull them into the other because they do different things.
|
#26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,458
|
The problem I've had with CC and every other piece of software that has the ability to drag and drop objects is that the placement is not consistent between zoom levels. If I zoom in close to get an exact placement of something, then zoom out, I'll see it offset.
If I fix it in the wide view, then zoom back in, it's offset the other way. |
#27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 865
|
Hmmm, I havent. And i used CC to generate maps at all sorts of different zoom levels.
What version of CC are you using? |
#28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jonesboro, AR (USA)
Posts: 858
|
I'm a big fan of CC myself - I've used it for years, and though there is a learning curve I didn't find it at all steep for getting started. Of course, the more you want to do, the more there is to learn .
I also use Photoshop, usually for just a few finishing touches. I haven't had problems with objects appearing displaced at different zoom levels either. I'll second the recommendation to check out cartographersguild.com. Very friendly, helpful folks over there, and tons of good advice. |
#29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 345
|
I haven't gotten my verification email yet (just bought the product).
Hit refresh a bunch of times, tried logging into the program to force a resend, couldn't find the option to do so. Any tips? |
#30 |
|
|